Tuberculosis (TB) is the deadliest infectious disease, and yet accurate diagnostics for the disease are unavailable for many subpopulations. In this study, we investigate the possibility of using human breath for the diagnosis of active TB among TB suspect patients, considering also several risk factors for TB for smokers and those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The analysis of exhaled breath, as an alternative to sputum-dependent tests, has the potential to provide a simple, fast, non-invasive, and readily available diagnostic service that could positively change TB detection. A total of 50 individuals from a clinic in South Africa were included in this pilot study. Human breath has been investigated in the setting of active TB using the thermal desorption-comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–time of flight mass spectrometry methodology and chemometric techniques. From the entire spectrum of volatile metabolites in breath, three machine learning algorithms (support vector machines, partial least squares discriminant analysis, and random forest) to select discriminatory volatile molecules that could potentially be useful for active TB diagnosis were employed. Random forest showed the best overall performance, with sensitivities of 0.82 and 1.00 and specificities of 0.92 and 0.60 in the training and test data respectively. Unsupervised analysis of the compounds implicated by these algorithms suggests that they provide important information to cluster active TB from other patients. These results suggest that developing a non-invasive diagnostic for active TB using patient breath is a potentially rich avenue of research, including among patients with HIV comorbidities.

Sampling of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has shown promise for detection of a range of diseases but results have proved hard to replicate due to a lack of standardization. In this work we introduce the ‘Peppermint Initiative’. The initiative seeks to disseminate a standardized experiment that allows comparison of breath sampling and data analysis methods. Further, it seeks to share a set of benchmark values for the measurement of VOCs in breath. Pilot data are presented to illustrate the standardized approach to the interpretation of results obtained from the Peppermint experiment. This pilot study was conducted to determine the washout profile of peppermint compounds in breath, identify appropriate sampling time points, and formalise the data analysis. Five and ten participants were recruited to undertake a standardized intervention by ingesting a peppermint oil capsule that engenders a predictable and controlled change in the VOC profile in exhaled breath. After collecting a pre-ingestion breath sample, five further samples are taken at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h after ingestion. Samples were analysed using ion mobility spectrometry coupled to multi-capillary column and thermal desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry. A regression analysis of the washout data was used to determine sampling times for the final peppermint protocol, and the time for the compound measurement to return to baseline levels was selected as a benchmark value. A measure of the quality of the data generated from a given technique is proposed by comparing data fidelity. This study protocol has been used for all subsequent measurements by the Peppermint Consortium (16 partners from seven countries). So far 1200 breath samples from 200 participants using a range of sampling and analytical techniques have been collected. The data from the consortium will be disseminated in subsequent technical notes focussing on results from individual platforms.

In this review, we report on the latest (2020‐Early 2021) instrumental advances and applications of comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC), including its hyphenation with novel upstream or downstream processes (sample preparation approaches or detection technologies). We also discuss software and analysis workflow developments necessary to elaborate the dense chemical information obtained. Thirty years after its inception, the use of GC×GC, as the main analytical tool or as a complementary platform, is undoubtedly shifting toward more applied challenges in a vast breadth of applications. Therefore, we consider the major fields (energy, fuel, foodstuff, plant, biological, and environmental) in which GC×GC has been successfully used, discussing some of the recent innovative research works.