Rolf Hut

Dr. Rolf Hut

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geoscience, chair of Water Resources Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 June 2013 in Hydrological Sciences Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMarkus Hrachowitz
Markus Hrachowitz
HSH.H.G. Savenije
H.H.G. Savenije
Günter BlöschlGünter Blöschl
Günter Blöschl
JMJeffrey McDonnell
Jeffrey McDonnell
MSM. Sivapalan
M. Sivapalan
CCC. Cudennec
C. Cudennec
The Prediction in Ungauged Basins (PUB) initiative of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS), launched in 2003 and concluded by the PUB Symposium 2012 held in Delft (23–25 October 2012), set out to shift the scientific culture of hydrology towards improved scientific understanding of hydrological processes, as well as associated uncertainties and the development of models with increasing realism and predictive power. This paper reviews the work that has been done under the six science themes of the PUB Decade and outlines the challenges ahead for the hydrological sciences community. Editor D. Koutsoyiannis Citation Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H.H.G., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J.J., Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J.W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M.P., Ehret, U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J.E., Gelfan, A., Gupta, H.V., Hughes, D.A., Hut, R.W., Montanari, A., Pande, S., Tetzlaff, D., Troch, P.A., Uhlenbrook, S., Wagener, T., Winsemius, H.C., Woods, R.A., Zehe, E., and Cudennec, C., 2013. A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (6), 1198–1255.

8 November 2014 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMarc Bierkens
Marc Bierkens
VBVictoria A. Bell
Victoria A. Bell
PBPeter Burek
Peter Burek
NCNathaniel Chaney
Nathaniel Chaney
LCLaura E. Condon
Laura E. Condon
EWEric F. Wood
Eric F. Wood

18 January 2018 in Hydrological Sciences Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FTFlavia Tauro
Flavia Tauro
JSJohn Selker
John Selker
NGNick Van De Giesen
Nick Van De Giesen
TATommaso Abrate
Tommaso Abrate
RURemko Uijlenhoet
Remko Uijlenhoet
SGSalvatore Grimaldi
Salvatore Grimaldi
To promote the advancement of novel observation techniques that may lead to new sources of information to help better understand the hydrological cycle, the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) established the Measurements and Observations in the XXI century (MOXXI) Working Group in July 2013. The group comprises a growing community of tech-enthusiastic hydrologists that design and develop their own sensing systems, adopt a multi-disciplinary perspective in tackling complex observations, often use low-cost equipment intended for other applications to build innovative sensors, or perform opportunistic measurements. This paper states the objectives of the group and reviews major advances carried out by MOXXI members toward the advancement of hydrological sciences. Challenges and opportunities are outlined to provide strategic guidance for advancement of measurement, and thus discovery.

10 June 2014 in WIREs Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NGNick Van De Giesen
Nick Van De Giesen
RHRolf Hut
Rolf Hut
JSJohn Selker
John Selker
In this opinion article, we present the Trans‐African Hydro‐Meteorological Observatory (TAHMO). The goal of TAHMO is to develop a dense network of hydro‐meteorological measurement stations throughout sub‐Saharan Africa. On average, there will be one station per 1000 km2. The stations will be cost‐effective through the use of new sensor and communication technologies. The station design is robust and aims at minimizing maintenance. Special attention will be paid to data quality assessment and control. Through public–private partnerships, the system will be made financially self‐sustaining. Education will play an important role as many stations will be placed at schools, where they will play a role in the curriculum. WIREs Water 2014, 1:341–348. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1034This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Hydrological Processes Science of Water > Water and Environmental Change Human Water > Water Governance

9 February 2022 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHCaitlyn A. Hall
Caitlyn A. Hall
SSSheila M. Saia
Sheila M. Saia
APAndrea Popp
Andrea Popp
NDNilay Dogulu
Nilay Dogulu
SSStanislaus J. Schymanski
Stanislaus J. Schymanski
RHRolf Hut
Rolf Hut
Open, accessible, reusable, and reproducible hydrologic research can have a significant positive impact on the scientific community and broader society. While more individuals and organizations within the hydrology community are embracing open science practices, technical (e.g., limited coding experience), resource (e.g., open access fees), and social (e.g., fear of weaknesses being exposed or ideas being scooped) challenges remain. Furthermore, there are a growing number of constantly evolving open science tools, resources, and initiatives that can be overwhelming. These challenges and the ever-evolving nature of the open science landscape may seem insurmountable for hydrologists interested in pursuing open science. Therefore, we propose the general “Open Hydrology Principles” to guide individual and community progress toward open science for research and education and the “Open Hydrology Practical Guide” to improve the accessibility of currently available tools and approaches. We aim to inform and empower hydrologists as they transition to open, accessible, reusable, and reproducible research. We discuss the benefits as well as common open science challenges and how hydrologists can overcome them. The Open Hydrology Principles and Open Hydrology Practical Guide reflect our knowledge of the current state of open hydrology; we recognize that recommendations and suggestions will evolve and expand with emerging open science infrastructures, workflows, and research experiences. Therefore, we encourage hydrologists all over the globe to join in and help advance open science by contributing to the living version of this document and by sharing open hydrology resources in the community-supported repository (https://open-hydrology.github.io, last access: 1 February 2022).

29 August 2022 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JAJerom P. M. Aerts
Jerom P. M. Aerts
RHRolf Hut
Rolf Hut
NGNick Van De Giesen
Nick Van De Giesen
NDNiels Drost
Niels Drost
WVWillem J. van Verseveld
Willem J. van Verseveld
PHPieter Hazenberg
Pieter Hazenberg
Distributed hydrological modelling moves into the realm of hyper-resolution modelling. This results in a plethora of scaling-related challenges that remain unsolved. To the user, in light of model result interpretation, finer-resolution output might imply an increase in understanding of the complex interplay of heterogeneity within the hydrological system. Here we investigate spatial scaling in the form of varying spatial resolution by evaluating the streamflow estimates of the distributed wflow_sbm hydrological model based on 454 basins from the large-sample CAMELS data set. Model instances are derived at three spatial resolutions, namely 3 km, 1 km, and 200 m. The results show that a finer spatial resolution does not necessarily lead to better streamflow estimates at the basin outlet. Statistical testing of the objective function distributions (Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) score) of the three model instances resulted in only a statistical difference between the 3 km and 200 m streamflow estimates. However, an assessment of sampling uncertainty shows high uncertainties surrounding the KGE score throughout the domain. This makes the conclusion based on the statistical testing inconclusive. The results do indicate strong locality in the differences between model instances expressed by differences in KGE scores of on average 0.22 with values larger than 0.5. The results of this study open up research paths that can investigate the changes in flux and state partitioning due to spatial scaling. This will help to further understand the challenges that need to be resolved for hyper-resolution hydrological modelling.