(1) Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients suffering from chronic neck pain, specifically on pain and disability. The research delves into an area of growing significance within the realm of healthcare, aiming to understand the impact of digital interventions on the rehabilitation process for individuals with prolonged neck pain. (2) Methods: The comprehensive review encompasses a wide array of studies evaluating the collective outcomes of numerous trials focused on telerehabilitation strategies. In this systematic review, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched to identify studies on telerehabilitation’s impact on pain. (3) Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Using the Downs and Black quality assessment, three studies were classified as good and five as fair. The authors identify specific modalities within telerehabilitation, such as remote exercise programs and virtual consultations, that contribute significantly to positive patient outcomes. Meta-analysis indicated a significant overall effect of telerehabilitation on pain reduction (MD = −1.27; 95% CI = −2.06; −0.47; p = 0.002). These findings support telerehabilitation’s efficacy in pain management. (4) Conclusions: The synthesis of evidence presented in this systematic review and meta-analysis underscores the potential of telerehabilitation as an effective and accessible means of managing chronic neck pain, offering valuable insights for both healthcare practitioners and policymakers in advancing patient-centered care.

Objective: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the results of an in-hospital Self-Management program in addition to physiotherapy in severe patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) compared to a physiotherapy program. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 66 acute exacerbation COPD patients were included and were randomly divided into three groups. The Control group received standard medical treatment. The Physical therapy group received Control Group intervention plus a Physical Therapy intervention, consisting of neuromuscular stimulation therapy on the quadriceps muscle accompanied by lower limb exercises. The Self-management group received Physical Therapy group intervention plus a Self-Management program, which included educational information complemented with a problem-based session, breathing exercises and relaxation exercises. The main outcomes measured were the health-related quality of life and functionality. Results: All treated groups show improvements in all outcomes, being significant in the case of all total scores of health-related quality of life and functionality(p < 0.05) between Physical Therapy group and Self-Management group. At 3 months, health-related quality of life shows reductions in all subscores in Control Group and Physical Therapy groups, while Self-Management group shows minimal maintenance of the values. Conclusion: An individualized Self-Management program added to a physiotherapy program administered once a day improves health-related quality of life and functionality compared to a Physical Therapy and to a Control Group in hospitalized severe COPD patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of pain (i.e., pain intensity, pain interference, clinical presentation) in Long-COVID-19 patients and compare the location of pain between successfully recovered COVID-19 patients and healthy matched controls. A cross-sectional case-control study was carried out. Long-COVID-19 patients, age- and sex-matched patients with a history of COVID-19 who had successfully recovered, and healthy controls were included. Outcomes included were pain characteristics (Brief Pain Inventory and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire) and clinical presentation (Widespread Pain Index and Euroqol-5 Dimensions 5 Levels Visual Analogue Scale). Sixty-nine patients with Long-COVID-19 syndrome, sixty-six successfully recovered COVID-19 patients, and sixty-seven healthy controls were evaluated. Patients with Long-COVID-19 syndrome showed greater pain intensity and interference. In addition, they showed worse quality of life and greater widespread pain, with the most frequent locations of pain being the neck, legs, and head. In conclusion, patients with Long-COVID-19 syndrome show a high prevalence of pain, characterized by widespread pain of moderate intensity and interference, with the most frequent locations being the neck, legs, and head, significantly affecting the quality of life of these patients.

Background: Dyspnoea is often found months and years later in the "long-covid" syndrome, impairing quality of life and further perpetuating anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders. Physiotherapy was recommended as a treatment in long-covid, but there is still insufficient evidence on its effectiveness. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search on MEDLINE, PEDro, WOS, Scopus, VHL and the Cochrane Library until July 2023 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023427464). We selected comparative trials including adults with persistent breathlessness following COVID-19, regardless of the initial severity, for whom physiotherapy was implemented as a treatment for dyspnoea. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and assessed the study quality using the PEDro Scale. Results: 19 studies that included 1292 adults fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 15 were randomised controlled trials and 4 non-randomised controlled trials. As for the rehabilitation modalities, 6 studies used respiratory muscle training, 6 studies used low to moderate intensity rehabilitation, 6 used high intensity rehabilitation and one used passive rehabilitation. The methods used between and within each group differed greatly, leading to an expected high heterogeneity of results. Nethertheless the random-effects model found a significant difference favouring physiotherapy (SMD-0.63, 95 CI [-1.03;-0.24], p < 0.001, I 2 = 88 %). Subgroup analysis showed a significant effect in the high intensity rehabilitation group alone, with null heterogeneity. Conclusion: In people suffering from dyspnoea following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, physiotherapy and especially pulmonary rehabilitation may help alleviate respiratory symptoms. Future studies will need to provide more consistent rehabilitation methods and better descriptions of them so as to reveal clear effects and avoid the confusion caused by using too many rehabilitation modalities.