Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are drugs that are included in the guidelines of hematological and solid cancer treatments, give highly effective results and increase T cell functionality. However, these drugs can cause immune-related adverse events resembling autoimmune diseases. Case report: A 50-year-old male patient was admitted to an external center with complaints of chest pain and dyspnea. Thoracic CT revealed a 97 × 58 mm mass in the left lung, and a diagnosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) was made by biopsy. The PET/CT performed for staging was also evaluated as extensive stage small cell lung cancer. It was decided to give a combination of atezolizumab and carboplatin-etoposide to the patient. Management and outcome: The patient completed 3 cycles without any problem. Discordance was detected in the hemogram of the patient who came to the control for the assessment of response and had a regression in the imaging. Hemoglobin 9.6 g/dl (N: 14–17.5) hematocrit 14.8% (N: 41–51) were detected in the hemogram. Agglutinins were seen in the peripheral smear performed. Cold agglutinin (+4 positive) and indirect coombs (+3 positive) were found positive. Atezolizumab was stopped and methylprednisolone was started. After 10 days of treatment, discordance improved and methylprednisolone was discontinued by decreasing to half dose every 5 days. Discussion: With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the variety of side effects has increased and case reports have increased. After detection of cold agglutinin, IgG, cryoglobulin, mycoplasma pneumonia, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV were found negative in the differential diagnosis, Our case appears to be immune checkpoint inhibitor-related Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD). It should not be forgotten that immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are widely used, may cause CAD, and hemoglobin-hematocrit discordance should be paid attention to in routine controls.

CD44, a stem cell-associated adhesion molecule, and CD47, an anti-phagocytic checkpoint, have been implicated in breast cancer chemoresistance, but their relationship to neoadjuvant response is poorly defined. We assessed both markers by immunohistochemistry in pre-treatment core biopsies from 43 women treated with neoadjuvant therapy at a single center. Total pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0/is ypN0), designated the primary endpoint during peer review, occurred in 12 patients (27.9%), and breast pCR (ypT0/is) in 14 (32.6%). Total pCR rates were 18.2% in CD44-positive and 38.1% in CD44-negative tumors (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.09–1.46; Fisher exact p = 0.185). CD44 positivity was concentrated in rarely responding hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative tumors, and stratification by subtype moved the odds ratio toward the null (0.62; exact 95% CI, 0.07–5.25). For CD47, the odds ratio per one-point increase in immunoreactivity score was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.54–1.19; p = 0.264), but immunoreactivity was low (only two tumors reached the prespecified high-expression threshold) and possibly technically compromised, so these findings are inconclusive. No statistically detectable association was observed between either marker and total or breast pCR; treatment could not be adjusted for, and only very large effects were detectable. These exploratory data do not provide sufficient evidence to support CD44 or CD47 as response markers.

Background/Objectives: Paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors, and data describing them from a medical oncology perspective are limited. We characterized clinicopathological features, tumor localization, and treatment outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 43 patients with PGL at a single medical oncology department. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), defined as time to first recurrence or death from any cause; overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and prognostic associations were secondary. Results: Median age was 44 years, 60.5% were female, and tumors were sympathetic (extra-adrenal) in 55.8% and parasympathetic (head and neck) in 39.5%. After a median follow-up of 116.8 months, 40 patients (93.0%) underwent resection, among whom 14 RFS events occurred (13 recurrences, 1 unrelated death). Median RFS and OS were not reached (60-month RFS, 67.1%; 120-month OS, 83.3%). Among nine patients receiving first-line systemic therapy (eight response-evaluable), ORR was 12.5% and DCR 37.5%. In exploratory univariable analysis, a Ki-67 index ≥ 3% correlated with recurrence (time-averaged hazard ratio, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.55–13.19; p = 0.006), alongside an R1 resection margin (not significant after Bonferroni correction). Conclusions: These findings may support further evaluation of Ki-67 within risk-adapted surveillance but do not replace germline testing.

Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for approximately 85% of cases. Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a core component of first-line treatment for advanced-stage NSCLC lacking driver mutations. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is currently used as the standard biomarker, yet its predictive value remains limited, and in most immunotherapy trials, treatment efficacy has been observed independently of PD-L1 expression status. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), an epigenetic regulator, promotes immune escape by suppressing antigen presentation and impairing CD8+ T-cell function, thereby generating an immune-cold tumor microenvironment, positioning it as a promising candidate biomarker. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 102 NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy at a single center between 2018 and 2024. EZH2 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. A cohort-derived 25% threshold was used for the primary exploratory analysis, and the analyses were repeated using a 50% threshold as a sensitivity analysis. Patients were classified as EZH2-high (45.1%) and EZH2-low (54.9%) at the 25% threshold. Results: At the 25% threshold, objective response rate (ORR) was 53.6% in the EZH2-low group and 45.7% in the EZH2-high group (Fisher’s exact p = 0.551), while disease control rate (DCR) was 64.3% and 60.9%, respectively (p = 0.837). Median overall survival (OS) was 37 versus 27 months (log-rank p = 0.323), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 versus 12 months (p = 0.387). No significant correlation was found between EZH2 and PD-L1 expression (r = 0.167, p = 0.138). In treatment-line-adjusted Cox models, EZH2 expression was not associated with OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.953, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.533–1.704; p = 0.870) or PFS (HR 0.996, 95% CI 0.573–1.733; p = 0.989), whereas squamous histology was an independent predictor of survival. Results remained non-significant at the 50% threshold. Early progression was uncommon and did not differ significantly by EZH2 status overall or within PD-L1 strata. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, EZH2 expression was not independently associated with response, early progression, OS, or PFS, and showed no correlation with PD-L1. These exploratory findings do not support the clinical use of EZH2 as a biomarker at this stage; prospective, multicenter studies using predefined thresholds and standardized immunohistochemical methods are needed to clarify its potential role as a marker complementary to PD-L1.

Colonoscopy is a widely used tool for the diagnosis and treatment of colon disease [1]. It is the gold standart to visualize the large bowel [2]. Acute phosphate nephropathy (APhN) is a clinical entity which causes acute and subsequent chronic renal failure after exposure to oral sodium phosphate (OSP) bowel purgatives. APhN is seen as a result of oral sodium phosphate use in patients undergoing bowel cleansing before colonoscopy [3]. Generally, patients who will undergo colonoscopy are given 45 ml of OSP twice, starting 12-24 hours before the procedure. After intestinal absorption, elevated urea and creatinine, transient hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hypokalemia and high anion gap metabolic acidosis may also be observed [4]. Advanced age, ACEi/ARB use, acute or chronic kidney disese or the presence of a kidney transplant, retention of OSP resulting from poor bowel motility or colitis, female gender, volume depletion, hypertension, diabetes, and diuretic, lithium, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use are considered as risk factors [5]. This case report describes a patient who developed nephropathy and required urgent observation and treatment after phosphate administration before colonoscopy.