Financial accounting manipulation (FAM) remains a persistent concern in emerging Asian markets, yet existing studies typically assess firm resilience, market valuation, and institutional governance separately. This study addresses this gap by examining how the Resilience Factor (RF), Market Valuation (VAL), and Country Governance Index (CGI), along with their interaction effects, shape FAM. Using a panel dataset of 4303 non-financial firms across 17 Asian countries from 2012 to 2023 (51,636 observations), the analysis employs an Instrumental Variable–Two-Stage Least-Squares (IV-2SLS) approach to address endogeneity related to simultaneity and omitted variable bias. The results show that financially resilient firms are more prone to manipulation, market valuation reduces manipulation incentives, and stronger country governance constrains manipulation. Moreover, valuation moderates the governance–manipulation relationship, suggesting complementary monitoring roles between markets and institutions. Robustness checks across regions, industries, and the COVID-19 period confirm the findings. The study contributes to agency and institutional theory by highlighting how firm-level and country-level mechanisms jointly influence manipulation, offering policy implications for regulators and investors in Asian capital markets.