Regular toothbrushing is the primary self-care method to prevent the most common dental diseases and is considered an important public health indicator. This retrospective observational study aimed to examine cross-national time trends in adolescent toothbrushing behaviour and its association with sociodemographic factors between 1994 and 2018. We studied data from 20 countries that conducted seven surveys of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study. Adolescents aged 11, 13 and 15 years responded to questions on their toothbrushing frequency, family affluence and structure. Altogether, reports of 691,559 students were analysed using descriptive statistics and binominal logistic regression. The findings showed an overall positive trend in the prevalence of more-than-once-a-day toothbrushing frequency during the entire study period mainly due to a noticeable increase from 1994 to 2010 (except Denmark and Sweden); this trend continued significantly thereafter in 12 of 20 countries. Across all countries, girls and adolescents from more affluent families were more likely to brush their teeth regularly. These relationships remained unchanged throughout the study period, whereas the age-related difference in toothbrushing prevalence decreased noticeably, and the negative relationship between toothbrushing and living in a non-intact family became evident. While the prevalence of regular toothbrushing among adolescents has increased in recent decades, it is still far behind the recommended level of twice-daily brushing for everyone across all countries. The promotion of toothbrushing needs to start at an early age, with a special focus on boys and adolescents from low-affluence and non-intact families.

The relationship between parental attitudes towards health and child development has been a topic of interest for many years; however, research results in this field are still inconsistent. This study aimed to develop a structural equation model of the Parental Attitudes toward Child Oral Health (PACOH) scale, using this model to analyse the relationship between parental attitudes with demographic variables and the oral health-related behaviour of parents and children. A total of 302 parents (87% mothers) answered questions regarding their own and their children’s, aged 4–7 years, oral health-related actions and completed the 38-item PACOH scale. The structural equation model indicated that parental attitudes captured by the PACOH scale can be fitted to a second-order factorial model, even with the scale shortened to 21 items. The model demonstrated good fit characteristics (CFI = 0.925; IFI = 0.927; GFI = 0.915; RMSEA = 0.049), making it a reliable tool for examining the structure of parental attitudes. This model was employed in the multi-group analysis, revealing the close relationship between positive parents’ attitudes towards their child’s oral health and oral health-promoting behaviour both in parents and children, such as regular tooth brushing (p < 0.001), visiting the dentist (p = 0.027), and parents helping their child brush his/her teeth (p < 0.001). In light of these findings, it was concluded that Parental Attitudes towards Child Oral Health should be considered an essential factor influencing the development of oral health-promoting behaviour in children.

Background/Objectives: Parental attitudes play a crucial role in shaping children’s oral health habits and preventing dental diseases. This study aimed to explore the theoretical pathways through which parental behavior and attitudes toward child oral health can influence the dental caries experience as measured by the dmf-t index in preschool children in Lithuania. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 302 children aged 4–7 years and their parents (262 mothers). Parental attitudes were assessed using the Parental Attitudes Towards Child Oral Health (PACOH) scale. For the children, the following variables were considered: sex, age, dental caries experience (dmf-t index in the primary dentition), oral hygiene index (Silness–Löe Plaque Index), toothbrushing frequency, and parental assistance with toothbrushing. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was applied for the data analysis. Results: The main path through which parental attitudes towards child oral health influenced the dmf-t index was via toothbrushing frequency (β = −0.17) or parental assistance with toothbrushing (β = 0.24). These factors were then linked to the oral hygiene index (β = 0.20 and β = −0.47, respectively), which ultimately influenced dmf-t (β = 0.52). The parents’ attitudes and toothbrushing frequency per se had no significant effect on children’s dmf-t (β = −0.06 and β = −0.04, respectively). The final model met all goodness-of-fit criteria: Chi-square test p = 0.211, Incremental Fit Index IFI = 0.994, Tucker–Lewis Index TLI = 0.982, Comparative Fit Index CFI = 0.994, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation RMSEA = 0.038. Conclusions: Findings from this study demonstrate that parents play a significant role in determining children’s oral health. Regular toothbrushing, parental assistance with toothbrushing, and good oral hygiene are critical factors linking parents’ oral health-related attitudes to a child’s experience of early caries. Identifying the associations between dental caries risk factors helps plan interventions.

Background and objectives: The role of parents and the family in promoting children’s oral health is increasingly acknowledged in the dental literature. This study aimed to investigate twelve-year changes in pre-schoolers’ oral health and parental involvement in children’s dental care using data from two repeated cross-sectional surveys. The objectives were (1) to assess the temporal changes in children’s dental health status and oral health-related behaviours, (2) to examine temporal changes in parental attitudes toward their children’s oral health care, and (3) to analyze the associations between observed changes. Materials and methods: Two identical cross-sectional surveys were conducted in 2010/2011 (n = 294) and 2023 (n = 304). In both surveys, parents answered questions regarding their children’s oral health care and completed the 38-item ‘Parental Attitudes toward Children’s Oral Health’ (PACOH) scale, while the dental health of their 3–7-year-old children was clinically assessed. Changes in the examined characteristics were analyzed using general linear models. Results: Significant positive changes (p < 0.001) were observed when comparing the surveys: the dmf-t (decayed, missing, filled teeth) score for deciduous teeth decreased from 5.56 to 3.31; the Silness–Löe Plaque Index decreased from 1.45 to 1.15; the percentage of children brushing their teeth regularly increased from 33.0% to 55.3%; the percentage of parents assisting their child with tooth brushing increased from 19.2% to 85.1%; and regular visits to a children’s dentist increased from 36.4% to 85.1%. Moreover, the study revealed better parental attitudes toward their children’s oral health care, as reflected by a change in the total score of the PACOH scale from 112 to 122. Conclusions: It was concluded that changes in parental attitudes played a crucial role in driving positive trends in oral health-related behaviours, which likely contributed to the improvement of dental health in children. Therefore, understanding and influencing parental attitudes can be essential for promoting good oral health skills and good oral health in young children.

Background and Objectives: Research into the relationship between occupation and dental fear and anxiety (DFA) is scarce. This exploratory study aimed to compare the level of DFA and its association with its predictors amongst adults from different occupational groups. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study with 422 respondents from four occupational groups (physicians, teachers, industry workers, and artists) was carried out. A questionnaire on previous dental experience using the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS), Dental Fear Survey (DFS), and Self-Esteem Scale was self-administered electronically. The data analysis involved descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results: The DFA levels differed significantly across the occupational groups, with the lowest mean scores among physicians (DAS = 9.29 (SE 0.39); DFS-1 = 14.67 (0.63); DFS-2 = 33.94 (1.69)) and the highest mean scores among artists (DAS = 10.74 (0.38); DFS-1 = 17.19 (0.71); DFS-2 = 41.34 (1.92)). A significant impact of self-esteem on DFA was observed among physicians, teachers, and artists, but not among industry workers. Multi-group analysis with SEM revealed differences in the variable association (Chi-squared = 53.75; df = 21; p < 0.001), thus rejecting the hypothesis of the same mechanism underlying DFA across occupational groups. Conclusions: Individuals from various occupations experience DFA at different levels, and there are different mechanisms underlying their DFA. These findings can provide valuable insights for dental practitioners in developing tailored approaches to reduce the feeling of DFA of their patients.

Background/Objectives: Dentists, due to their close contact with patients, are in a unique position to recognize and report cases of child abuse and neglect. This study aimed to explore dentists’ knowledge and attitudes toward child abuse and neglect encountered in their professional practice. Methods: An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted among 414 members of the Lithuanian Dental Chamber (general dentists, dental specialists, dental hygienists, and dental assistants) and 153 graduating dental students, yielding a total sample of 567 respondents. They reported knowledge and attitudes regarding reasons for child abuse within the family and barriers to referring suspected cases. The underlying structure of responses was examined using exploratory factor analysis, and differences in knowledge and attitudes across professional groups were tested using ANOVA. Results: Most respondents agreed that low family socioeconomic status (87.7%), child’s disability (65.3%), and medical conditions (53.2%) are the main reasons for child abuse. These and other reasons clustered into two factors: family social vulnerability, and child health-related vulnerability; however, professional specialization had only a very small effect on both factors (η² = 0.013 and η² = 0.017, respectively). The majority of respondents (75.6%) agreed that dentists should report cases of child abuse or violence against children in all circumstances. The barriers to reporting child abuse were fear of negative consequences, and professional uncertainty; professional specialization had a significant effect on both of these factors (η² = 0.019, p = 0.027 and η² = 0.037, p < 0.001, respectively). Dental specialists reported the highest levels of fear of negative consequences and professional uncertainty, whereas students reported the fewest difficulties in reporting. Dental specialists and students demonstrated the highest levels of knowledge, while dental hygienists demonstrated the lowest level of knowledge regarding child abuse (mean sum score of knowledge was 11.2 (SE 0.38) vs. 10.0 (SE 0.30), respectively, p = 0.014). Conclusions: Overall, Lithuanian dentists, including students, demonstrate moderate knowledge and attitude in recognizing cases of child abuse and neglect; however, differences across professional groups remain and should be addressed to ensure more effective child protection.