Klaus Glenk

Prof. Klaus Glenk

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021
Verified
Book
Open access
PMPetr Mariel
Petr Mariel
DHDavid Hoyos
David Hoyos
MJMeyerhoff Juergen
Meyerhoff Juergen
MCMikołaj Czajkowski
Mikołaj Czajkowski
TDThijs Dekker
Thijs Dekker
MTMara Thiene
Mara Thiene
This open access book offers up-to-date advice and practical guidance on how to undertake a discrete choice experiment as a tool for environmental valuation. It discusses crucial issues in designing, implementing and analysing choice experiments. Compiled by leading experts in the field, the book promotes discrete choice analysis in environmental valuation through a more solid scientific basis for research practice. Instead of providing strict guidelines, the book helps readers avoid common mistakes often found in applied work. It is based on the collective reflections of the scientific network of researchers using discrete choice modelling in the field of environmental valuation (www.envecho.com).

8 January 2019 in Environmental and Resource Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKlaus Glenk
Klaus Glenk
RJRobert J. Johnston
Robert J. Johnston
JMJürgen Meyerhoff
Jürgen Meyerhoff
JSJulian Sagebiel
Julian Sagebiel

19 February 2018 in Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KGKlaus Glenk
Klaus Glenk
JMJulia Martin-Ortega
Julia Martin-Ortega
Restoration offers opportunities for securing and enhancing critical ecosystem services provided by peatlands, such as carbon storage, water retention and water quality, and support for biodiversity and wildlife. A comprehensive valuation encompassing the relevant public benefits of restoration and how these compare with it is lacking to date, leaving policy makers with little guidance with respect to the economic efficiency of restoring this climate-critical ecosystem. Using Scotland as a case study, this paper quantifies the non-market benefits of changes in peatland ecological condition associated with changes in ecosystem service provision and depending on the location of restoration efforts. Benefits on a per hectare basis are compared to varying capital and recurrent cost in a net present value space, providing a benchmark to be used in decision making on investments into peatland restoration. The findings suggest that peatland restoration is likely to be welfare enhancing. Benefits also exceed cost in appraisals of previous and future public investments into peatland restoration. The results thus strengthen the economic rationale for climate change mitigation through improved peatland management.

1 August 2019 in Resource and Energy Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KGKlaus Glenk
Klaus Glenk
JMJürgen Meyerhoff
Jürgen Meyerhoff
FAFaical Akaichi
Faical Akaichi
JMJulia Martin-Ortega
Julia Martin-Ortega


1 May 2017 in Forest Policy and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJulian Sagebiel
Julian Sagebiel
KGKlaus Glenk
Klaus Glenk
JMJürgen Meyerhoff
Jürgen Meyerhoff