Background: Native knee joint infections, while uncommon, present a serious condition predominantly instigated by bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus. Without timely intervention, they can result in joint destruction or sepsis, with risk factors encompassing preexisting medical conditions and iatrogenic procedures. The diagnostic process includes a comprehensive patient history, clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, imaging studies, and microbiological investigations. Treatment typically involves joint aspiration and arthroscopy. This study aims to examine and establish correlations between diagnostic criteria and treatment modalities, enhancing the speed and specificity of future therapeutic strategies. Materials and methods: The present study is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a 1200-bed university clinic between 2007 and 2017, with an in-depth examination of patient details, symptoms, treatments, and outcomes. A scoring system was developed to classify the severity of knee joint impairment, categorizing patients on the basis of hospital stay duration, surgeries, and postoperative factors such as recurring symptoms, pain, and range of motion. Results: This study of 116 patients with knee joint infections revealed that clinical symptoms such as pain, swelling, and effusion are common but not definitive for diagnosis. Laboratory analysis revealed no significant differences in CRP or leukocyte counts between cultures positive or negative for pathogens. Hospital stay and disease severity are influenced by factors such as age, sex, presence of polyarthritis, neutrophil count, and type of pathogen, with higher weight and cortisone treatment associated with poorer outcomes. Conclusions: This study highlights the diagnostic challenges in native knee joint infections, revealing the need for comprehensive approaches given the nonspecificity of clinical symptoms and laboratory findings. This underscores the importance of advancing research through standardized methodologies and prospective studies to increase the accuracy of diagnosis and the effectiveness of treatment in this field.

Background: Acetabular fractures continue to pose a major challenge in clinical practice, not least because of the growing geriatric population. While the influence of the force vectors on fracture formation is well established, the impact of anatomical factors on fracture morphology remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate patient-specific hip joint geometry, identify structural risk factors and correlate these with the resulting fracture patterns. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis included 226 patients (Mdn age = 58 yrs.) with acetabular fracture categorized by Judet/Letournel and the AO/OTA classification. Computed tomography (CT) datasets of the injured and contralateral sides were analyzed using multiplanar reconstruction. Parameters included modified center-edge (CE) angle (Wiberg), rotation angles (Ullmann and Anda), acetabular sector angle (Anda), true caput-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle, femoral head diameter and volume, as well as femoral neck length, circumference, and diameter. In addition, intrarater reliability within a subcohort was assessed for the metric measurements and inter-rater analysis for the classification of the entire sample. Results: The primary analysis showed direct effects of femoral head diameter, femoral neck length and femoral head size on the fracture type according to AO/OTA (type A/B/C), whereby this effect was particularly seen between type A and type C fractures (p = 0.001). Ordinal regression identified femoral head diameter as the only significant predictor (p = 0.02), with a 25% increased likelihood of complex fractures per unit of change. Low-energy trauma doubled the risk of severe fractures. Specific findings include a higher acetabular anteversion in anterior column fractures. Age correlated positively with the cause of injury and fracture type. The inter-rater reliability for fracture classification was excellent, as was the intrarater reliability of the measurements. Conclusions: This study suggests that anatomical factors, particularly proximal femoral geometry, have an impact on acetabular fracture morphology—in addition to factors such as trauma type and patient demographics.

Background: Germany’s high density of under-equipped hospitals and anticipated surge in orthopedic and trauma surgery-related diseases by 2030, combined with personnel shortages, are expected to increase patient transfers between hospitals, an issue that urgently needs standardized protocols. Despite some existing cooperative agreements, such as between joint-replacement centers or within the Trauma Network DGU^®, these measures do not adequately address the full range of patient-transfer cases, including those due to a lack of specialization or staff shortages, resulting in delayed treatment and potential health risks. This study aims to dissect the intricacies of interhospital transfers in orthopedics and trauma surgery across Germany, focusing on understanding the underlying reasons for transfers, comparing the operational structures of small and large hospitals, and laying the groundwork for future standardized protocols to enhance patient care. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the form of an online survey via SoSci Survey, which was directed at orthopedic surgeons and trauma surgeons working in hospitals in Germany. The 22-question survey gathered information on participants’ clinic roles, departmental details, transfer processes, frequent diagnoses, perceptions of transfer quality, and improvement areas. The survey was sent to orthopedic and trauma surgeons in Germany by the specialist society. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to ensure a comprehensive insight into interhospital transfer practices. Results: The study involved 152 participants from various hospital ranks and located in different hospital sizes and types across rural and urban areas. A significant difference was observed between the care structures of basic/regular care and central/maximum care hospitals, especially regarding the available facilities and specialties. These findings suggest improvements such as better patient documentation, increased digital communication, optimized patient distribution, and standardization of transfer requests, among others. Conclusions: This study highlights the urgent need for improved protocols and resource allocation to eliminate inequalities in transfers between hospitals in orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany.

Purpose: Kirschner wires (K-wires) are widely used for fracture fixation in paediatric trauma surgery. Although infectious complications are uncommon, they remain clinically relevant. Subcutaneous burial of K-wires has been proposed to reduce the risk of infection, but robust data from large paediatric cohorts remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate infectious and non-infectious complications following routine use of buried K-wires in children. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, paediatric patients (≤ 18 years) who underwent fracture fixation with routinely buried K-wires at a Level I trauma centre between January 2005 and November 2025 were included. Only patients with complete follow-up, including radiographic assessment and wire removal at the study institution, were analysed. The primary outcome was postoperative infection related to K-wire fixation. Secondary outcomes included non-infectious wound complications, reoperations, and fracture healing. Results: A total of 634 patients with a mean age of 10.2 ± 4.2 years were included; 96.8% sustained upper-extremity fractures. One superficial infection occurred (0.16%; 95% CI 0.00–0.88%), with no cases of deep infection or osteomyelitis. Secondary skin perforation without infection was observed in 8.36%, and minor wound-healing disturbances in 0.32%. No infection-related reoperations were required, and all fractures healed radiographically. Conclusions: Routine subcutaneous burial of K-wires in paediatric fracture fixation was associated with an exceptionally low rate of infectious complications and no cases of osteomyelitis in this large retrospective cohort. However, secondary skin perforation occurred in 8.36% of patients, and planned wire removal under anaesthesia represents an additional procedural burden. Given the predominance of upper-extremity fractures and the absence of an exposed-wire control group, these findings should be interpreted within the studied population and do not establish superiority over exposed K-wires.

Objective: Traumatic dislocation and fracture–dislocation of the hip are rare and severe injuries often associated with high-energy trauma. Early recognition and rapid, stable reduction are essential for successful treatment; otherwise, this type of injury is associated with poor functional outcomes and high rates of complications such as avascular necrosis. This retrospective study aims to describe and analyze long-term outcomes and survival rates after a hip dislocation. Methods: Between 2008 and 2021, all patients with traumatic hip dislocation who were treated in a Level I Trauma Center were retrospectively assessed and analyzed. During the follow-up examination, two experienced surgeons carried out a clinical follow-up examination and evaluated the available X-ray images. Anterior and posterior fracture–dislocations and femoral head fractures were classified according to Stewart and Milford’s and Pipkin’s classification system, respectively. All patients were followed up using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Lequesne score. Results: Forty-four (38 male and 6 female) patients with a mean age of 46.02 (±19.48) years were included. The average follow-up period was 45.69 (±45.69) months. Traffic accidents were the main cause of traumatic dislocation in this series, accounting for 75% of all cases. Associated injuries were noted in 28 cases. Twenty-three and 21 patients were treated with closed and open reduction, respectively. Isolated hip dislocations without bony involvement according to Stewart and Milford type 1 occurred in five cases. Type 3 injuries were most common, followed by type 4 injuries. This study found that the type of reduction and the trauma mechanism are not significant factors in long-term prognosis (p = 0.463). Thirteen patients had subjective excellent or good results in the HHS and Lequesne score. Late post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the hip developed in 10 patients (22.7%). Patients received a hip replacement at 20.7 months (1–102) months. Thus, after 2 years, implantation of a hip prosthesis due to post-traumatic coxarthrosis was necessary in 22.7% of all cases. The type of hip dislocation classified according to Stewart and Milford had no significant influence on the implantation of a hip prosthesis. Conclusions: Excellent or good results in HHS were obtained in patients with early, stable, and accurate reduction by closed or open methods. After 2 years, 22.7% of the patients needed a total hip replacement.

Objective: The current gold standard for detection of implant-related infections is the intraoperative collection of tissue samples. However, false-negative results frequently occur, particularly in infections caused by biofilm-forming bacteria. As a complementary method, sonication has therefore been established for detecting implant-associated infections, especially in periprosthetic joint infections. In trauma surgery, this technique is still rarely used. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic significance of sonication after osteosynthesis. Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent plate osteosynthesis removal between 1 January 2019, and 1 May 2021, with both sonication and intraoperative tissue sampling performed. Patients with inlying arthroplasties or nail-less osteosynthesis systems were excluded. Pre- and postoperative infection parameters (leukocytes, CRP) were recorded, and preoperative clinical findings were used to classify suspected infection. Results: A total of 57 patients (30 men, 27 women; mean age 57.6 years, range 12–91) were included. The mean treatment duration was 20.1 days (range 1–152). Sonication was positive in 33 patients, tissue samples in 28, with 31 cases (54%) showing concordant results. In cases with preoperative suspicion of infection, sonication was positive in 21 of 26 cases (80.7%) and tissue samples in 18 of 26 (69.2%), whereas without suspicion, positivity rates were 38% and 31%, respectively. Sonication and tissue results matched in 14 of 26 cases; in the remainder, results were different or incomplete. Preoperative CRP elevation and the presence of an infection membrane influenced sensitivity: sonication generally detected more bacteria (59–81%) than tissue samples (49–73%), though discrepancies remained. Conclusions: Sonication represents a valuable complementary method for detecting implant-related infections. Due to its high sensitivity but limited specificity, it should not be used as a standalone diagnostic method.