Nicola Ducci

Nicola Ducci


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 May 2026 in Audiology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Augusto Pietro CasaniAugusto Pietro Casani
Augusto Pietro Casani
NDNicola Ducci
Nicola Ducci
LCLuigi Califano
Luigi Califano
MGMauro Gufoni
Mauro Gufoni
Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common cause of episodic vertigo, yet its diagnosis remains primarily clinical and is often complicated by the absence of reliable objective biomarkers. Pupillary nystagmus, reflecting spontaneous oscillations of pupil diameter, has been proposed as a potential clinical sign of VM, but its quantitative characterization remains limited. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of pupillary nystagmus in VM and to provide a quantitative assessment using infrared pupillometry. Methods: In this case–control study, 137 patients with vestibular migraine and 102 healthy controls underwent comprehensive neuro-otological evaluation, including vestibular testing and pupillometric assessment. Pupillary activity was recorded using a dedicated infrared pupillometer, and oscillatory dynamics were quantified using the Pupillary Unrest Activity Level (PUAL), which was derived through spectral analysis (Larson–Neice algorithm). Statistical comparisons were performed using non-parametric methods. Results: PUAL values differed significantly between VM patients and controls (Mann–Whitney test p < 0.001), demonstrating a clear separation between groups. A cut-off value of 0.325 was identified as the upper limit of normality, suggesting that elevated PUAL values may indicate vestibular migraine. Conclusions: Pupillary nystagmus represents a clinically accessible sign that can be objectively quantified through infrared pupillometry. The PUAL index provides a measurable parameter reflecting altered vestibulo–autonomic dynamics in VM and may serve as a promising neuro-otological biomarker. The integration of pupillometric analysis with clinical evaluation may improve diagnostic accuracy and support the development of objective diagnostic tools in vestibular migraine.

6 November 2025 in Audiology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Augusto Pietro CasaniAugusto Pietro Casani
Augusto Pietro Casani
MGMauro Gufoni
Mauro Gufoni
NDNicola Ducci
Nicola Ducci
Giacinto Asprella LibonatiGiacinto Asprella Libonati
Giacinto Asprella Libonati
Giuseppe ChiarellaGiuseppe Chiarella
Giuseppe Chiarella
The brainstem plays a pivotal role in the generation and control of eye movements—including saccades, smooth pursuit, the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), vergence, and gaze holding. Beyond its vital physiological functions, it is also essential for the coordination of balance and movement. Consequently, eye movement disorders of brainstem origin are often accompanied by vertigo, imbalance, unsteady gait, and diplopia, particularly during changes in head or body position. A sound understanding of the neural structures involved in oculomotor and vestibular control is therefore crucial for accurately identifying and localizing a wide variety of brainstem syndromes. However, oculomotor abnormalities resulting from brainstem disease represent a major diagnostic challenge for the neurotologist, owing to the wide spectrum of possible etiologies (vascular, traumatic, degenerative, neoplastic), their variable severity and clinical course (acute, fluctuating, or progressive), and the frequent concomitant involvement of other central structures, particularly the cerebellum. This mini review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical features of oculomotor disorders and nystagmus associated with brainstem disease.

25 January 2024 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Augusto Pietro CasaniAugusto Pietro Casani
Augusto Pietro Casani
RARoberto Albera
Roberto Albera
CPCristina Piras
Cristina Piras
AAAndrea Albera
Andrea Albera
Antonio NotoAntonio Noto
Antonio Noto
Vassilios FanosVassilios Fanos
Vassilios Fanos
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) represents the most frequent cause of peripheral vertigo. In most cases, it is successfully treated using the canalith repositioning procedure, but it is often followed by continuous lightheadedness in the absence of vertigo or nystagmus (residual dizziness, RD). Our aim is to describe the clinical effectiveness and the urine metabolomics profile of treating these patients with polyphenol compound supplementation. We enrolled 30 patients reporting RD after BPPV of the posterior semicircular canal (PSC) successfully treated using the Semont maneuver. Supplementation with a polyphenol compound was administered for 60 days, and patients were evaluated after 30 and 60 days of treatment using self-administered questionnaires (Visual Analog Scales for Dizziness and Nausea, Dizziness Handicap Inventory, DHI) and urine metabolomics analysis performed using 1H-NMR spectroscopy and multivariate followed by univariate analysis. Most patients reported excellent or good efficacy in the treatment of RD with a significant decrease in VAS and DHI values. The metabolomics analysis identified six significant metabolites related to the treatment, namely 1-methylnicotinamide, anserine, hippurate, lysine, methyl succinate and urea, indicating the inflammatory activities and antioxidant properties of the polyphenol compound. These preliminary data suggest that supplementation with a polyphenol compound could induce some metabolic changes that can help in recovery from RD. However, future steps will require confirmation with a more significant cohort of patients and an extension of the metabolomics evaluation to other problems concerning the different clinical aspects of BPPV, such as the high rate of relapse.

31 March 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Augusto Pietro CasaniAugusto Pietro Casani
Augusto Pietro Casani
NDNicola Ducci
Nicola Ducci
LCLuigi Califano
Luigi Califano
MGMauro Gufoni
Mauro Gufoni
Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) is a common cause of episodic vertigo, yet its diagnosis remains primarily clinical and is often complicated by the absence of reliable objective biomarkers. Pupillary nystagmus, reflecting spontaneous oscillations of pupil diameter, has been proposed as a potential clinical sign of VM, but its quantitative characterization remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of pupillary nystagmus in VM and to provide a quantitative assessment using infrared pupillometry. Methods: In this case–control study, 69 patients with vestibular migraine and 13 healthy controls underwent comprehensive neuro-otological evaluation, including vestibular testing and pupillometric assessment. Pupillary activity was recorded using a dedicated infrared pupillometer, and oscillatory dynamics were quantified using the Pupillary Unrest Activity Level (PUAL), derived through spectral analysis (Larson–Neice algorithm). Statistical comparisons were performed using non-parametric methods. Results: PUAL values differed significantly between VM patients and controls (Wilcoxon test, p = 2.265 × 10⁻¹¹), demonstrating a clear separation between groups. A cut-off value of 0.393 was identified as the upper limit of normality, suggesting that elevated PUAL values may indicate vestibular migraine. Conclusions: Pupillary nystagmus represents a clinically accessible sign that can be objectively quantified through infrared pupillometry. The PUAL index provides a measurable parameter reflecting altered vestibulo–autonomic dynamics in VM and may serve as a promising neuro-otological biomarker. The integration of pupillometric analysis with clinical evaluation may improve diagnostic accuracy and support the development of objective diagnostic tools in vestibular migraine.

8 January 2026 in Audiology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMauro Gufoni
Mauro Gufoni
NDNicola Ducci
Nicola Ducci
DBDavide Bernacca
Davide Bernacca
LCLuigi Califano
Luigi Califano
Augusto Pietro CasaniAugusto Pietro Casani
Augusto Pietro Casani
Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the position of otoconial debris in lateral ampullar or non-ampullar canalolithiasis, based on two parameters: (1) the direction of the nystagmus appearing when the patient lies down, if present, and (2) the positional nystagmus evoked by the supine roll test. Methods: Theoretical results were compared with a population of 170 patients observed over the past ten years for horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (HC-BPPV). The series included 141 geotropic and 29 apogeotropic cases. Results: Among the geotropic forms, 80 showed no supine nystagmus (Geotropic Nystagmus with no supine nystagmus, GT0) (56.7%), 51 had supine nystagmus directed toward the healthy side (Geotropic Nystagmus with supine nystagmus congruent, direct toward the healthy side, GT+) (36.2%), and 10 toward the affected side (Geotropic Nystagmus with supine nystagmus incongruent direct to the affected side, GT−) (7.1%). In the apogeotropic group, 10 showed no supine nystagmus (Apogeotropic nystagmus with no supine nystagmus, AGT0) (34.6%), 16 had nystagmus toward the affected side (Apogeotropic Nystagmus with supine nystagmus congruent, direct toward the affected side, AGT+) (55.2%), and 1 toward the healthy side (Apogeotropic Nystagmus with supine nystagmus Incongruent, direct toward the healthy side, AGT−) (3.4%). Two cases presented monopositional apogeotropic nystagmus (mAGT), consistent with a “sieve-type canal jam” (6.8%). Overall, 90 out of 170 patients (52.9%) showed no nystagmus in the supine position, with a statistically significant difference between variants (p = 0.0474, Yates correction). Conclusions: The comparison between lying-down nystagmus and positional nystagmus, assessed through the Supine Roll Test as the leading diagnostic maneuver for horizontal canal involvement, may help identify the initial location of debris within the lateral semicircular canal and guide the appropriate liberatory maneuver, while the effectiveness and side of the maneuver allow the distinction between canal-side and utricular-side jams.

9 October 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Augusto Pietro CasaniAugusto Pietro Casani
Augusto Pietro Casani
NDNicola Ducci
Nicola Ducci
Background: Vestibular migraine (VM) and benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) frequently present with overlapping positional symptoms, making their differential diagnosis challenging. This study aimed to characterize positional vestibular manifestations in patients with suspected VM. Methods: In this observational study, 85 adult patients presenting with positional vertigo or dizziness in whom typical BPPV could not be demonstrated were evaluated. All patients underwent detailed clinical and neurotological assessment, videonystagmography, standardized positional testing. Results: Definite VM was diagnosed in 51/85 patients (60.0%) and probable VM in 23/85 (27.1%), accounting together for 87.1% of the selected cohort. Positional nystagmus was documented in 52 patients (61.2%), of whom 38/52 (73.1%) showed at least one atypical characteristic. Pupillary Nystagmus (PNy) was detected in 61/85 patients (71.8. Among 14 patients with an initially BPPV-like positional pattern, five responded to canalith repositioning maneuvers, whereas nine had persistent or recurrent symptoms requiring diagnostic reassessment. At 3 months, 60/74 patients (81.1%) with definite or probable VM reported marked overall clinical improvement, while complete resolution of positional vertigo or dizziness occurred in 49/74 (66.2%). Positional nystagmus resolved in 36/47 patients (76.6%) who had presented with this finding at baseline. Conclusions: VM should be considered in patients with recurrent positional vestibular symptoms when positional findings are atypical, variable, or inconsistent with a single semicircular canal disorder, particularly when repositioning maneuvers are ineffective. PNy may provide an additional supportive finding, although its di-agnostic value requires validation in controlled studies. Treatment response may support the overall clinical interpretation but should not be regarded as an independent diagnostic criterion.