Alexander Ferrein

Dr. Alexander Ferrein


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 August 2015 in Journal of Field Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMax Leingartner
Max Leingartner
JMJohannes Maurer
Johannes Maurer
Alexander FerreinAlexander Ferrein
Alexander Ferrein
GSGerald Steinbauer
Gerald Steinbauer

4 October 2012 in Intelligent Service Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Stefan SchifferStefan Schiffer
Stefan Schiffer
Alexander FerreinAlexander Ferrein
Alexander Ferrein
GLGerhard Lakemeyer
Gerhard Lakemeyer

21 September 2022 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJoschua Schulte-Tigges
Joschua Schulte-Tigges
MFMarco Förster
Marco Förster
GNGjorgji Nikolovski
Gjorgji Nikolovski
Michael RekeMichael Reke
Michael Reke
Alexander FerreinAlexander Ferrein
Alexander Ferrein
TWThomas Walter
Thomas Walter
In this paper, we report on our benchmark results of the LiDAR sensors Livox Horizon, Robosense M1, Blickfeld Cube, Blickfeld Cube Range, Velodyne Velarray H800, and Innoviz Pro. The idea was to test the sensors in different typical scenarios that were defined with real-world use cases in mind, in order to find a sensor that meet the requirements of self-driving vehicles. For this, we defined static and dynamic benchmark scenarios. In the static scenarios, both LiDAR and the detection target do not move during the measurement. In dynamic scenarios, the LiDAR sensor was mounted on the vehicle which was driving toward the detection target. We tested all mentioned LiDAR sensors in both scenarios, show the results regarding the detection accuracy of the targets, and discuss their usefulness for deployment in self-driving cars.

17 August 2016 in KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alexander FerreinAlexander Ferrein
Alexander Ferrein
GSGerald Steinbauer
Gerald Steinbauer
This summer, RoboCup competitions were held for the 20th time in Leipzig, Germany. It was the second time that RoboCup took place in Germany, 10 years after the 2006 RoboCup in Bremen. In this article, we give an overview on the latest developments of RoboCup and what happened in the different leagues over the last decade. With its 20th edition, RoboCup clearly is a success story and a role model for robotics competitions. From our personal view point, we acknowledge this by giving a retrospection about what makes RoboCup such a success.

1 January 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
TNTim Niemueller
Tim Niemueller
SRSebastian Reuter
Sebastian Reuter
Alexander FerreinAlexander Ferrein
Alexander Ferrein

1 January 2006
Verified
Book Chapter
Open access
PDF file
Alexander FerreinAlexander Ferrein
Alexander Ferrein
LHLutz Hermanns
Lutz Hermanns
GLGerhard Lakemeyer
Gerhard Lakemeyer
In robotic soccer a good ball position estimate is essential for successful play. Given the uncertainties in the perception of each individual robot, merging the local perceptions of the robots into a global ball estimate often results in a more reliable estimate and helps to increase team performance. Robots can use the global ball position even if they themselves do not see the ball or they can use it to adjust their own perception faults. In this paper we report on our results of comparing state-of-the-art sensor fusion techniques like Kalman filters or the Monte Carlo approach in RoboCup’s Middle-size league. We compare our results to previously published work from other Middle-size league teams and show how the quality of perceiving the ball position is increased.