F. Ruben. H.A. Nurmohamed

F. Ruben. H.A. Nurmohamed


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 December 2025 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FNF. Ruben. H.A. Nurmohamed
F. Ruben. H.A. Nurmohamed
KAKevin Allen
Kevin Allen
MMMackenzie Malo
Mackenzie Malo
CFConnor Stanley Frank
Connor Stanley Frank
JDJ. Fred F. Hooning van Duyvenbode
J. Fred F. Hooning van Duyvenbode
BWBart C.H. van der Wal
Bart C.H. van der Wal
Background: the primary challenge with implant infections is the formation of biofilm, which harbors dormant bacteria that reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics and amplify antibiotic resistance, exacerbating the global antimicrobial resistance crisis. A potential novel treatment strategy is radioimmunotherapy, which uses antibodies linked to radioisotopes to deliver targeted radiation to the bacteria and biofilm. We describe the first in vivo use of targeted radiation therapy, employing Actinium-225 (α-radiation) and Lutetium-177 (β-radiation) labeled antibodies to treat a Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-associated intramedullary implant infection. Untargeted radiation in the form of unbound radionuclide treatment was also evaluated. Methods: to assess therapeutic efficacy, bacterial counts were performed on implant and surrounding bone after seven days of follow-up. Biodistribution was evaluated using SPECT/CT and ex vivo gamma counting. Results: radioimmunotherapy using an antibody against wall teichoic acid which was labeled with Actinium-225 and Lutetium-177 achieved bacterial reductions between 45% and 93% on the implant and surrounding bone. Surprisingly, a similar antimicrobial effect was observed with unbound Actinium-225 treatment reducing the bacterial load by 80% on the implant and 98% in the surrounding bone. Indications of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with Lutetium-177 labeled antibodies were observed through hepatic and renal function evaluations. Conclusions: These results should be interpreted in the context of the study’s constraints, particularly the limited animal sample size. Nonetheless, the results suggest that in vivo applied radiation may help reduce a biofilm-associated infection at the implant site as well as in the surrounding bone. These findings encourage further investigation into the use of targeted and non-targeted radiation, potentially combined with antibiotics, to develop effective strategies for eradicating biofilm-associated implant infections.

7 August 2025 in Research Square
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
FNF. Ruben. H.A. Nurmohamed
F. Ruben. H.A. Nurmohamed
KAKevin J.H. Allen
Kevin J.H. Allen
MMMackenzie E. Malo
Mackenzie E. Malo
CFConnor Frank
Connor Frank
JDJ. Fred. F. Hooning van Duijvenbode
J. Fred. F. Hooning van Duijvenbode
BWBart C.H. van der Wal
Bart C.H. van der Wal
The primary challenge with implant infections is the formation of biofilm, which harbors dormant bacteria that reduce the effectiveness of antibiotics and amplify antibiotic resistance, exacerbating the global antimicrobial resistance crisis. A potential novel treatment strategy is radioimmunotherapy, which uses antibodies linked to radioisotopes to deliver targeted radiation to the bacteria and biofilm. We describe the first in vivo use of targeted radiation therapy, employing Actinium-225 (α-radiation) and Lutetium-177 (β-radiation) labeled antibodies to treat a Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-associated intramedullary implant infection. Untargeted radiation in the form of unbound radionuclide treatment was also evaluated. To assess therapeutic efficacy, bacterial counts were performed on implant and surrounding bone after seven days of follow-up. Biodistribution was evaluated using SPECT/CT and ex vivo gamma counting. Radioimmunotherapy using an antibody against wall teichoic acid with Actinium-225 and Lutetium-177 treatment achieved bacterial reductions between 45% and 93% on the implant and surrounding bone. Surprisingly, a similar antimicrobial effect was observed with unbound Actinium-225 treatment reducing the bacterial load by 80% on the implant and 98% in the surrounding bone. Indications of maximum tolerance with Lutetium-177 labeled antibodies were observed through hepatic and renal function evaluations. These results suggest that in vivo radiation therapy may help reduce a biofilm-associated infection at the implant site as well as in the surrounding bone. These findings encourage further investigation into the use of targeted and non-targeted radiation, potentially combined with antibiotics, to develop effective strategies for eradicating biofilm-associated implant infections.