Background Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) are one of the most common and neglected side effects during the treatment of schizophrenia. The risk factors of EPS in Chinese patients with schizophrenia and its relationship with psychiatric symptoms and mood symptoms of schizophrenia remain unknown. Aims The main objective of this study is to explore the risk factors of EPS caused by antipsychotics and the relationship between EPS and psychotic symptoms and mood symptoms of schizophrenia. Method This study included 679 patients with schizophrenia who have met the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition. Patients were divided into the EPS group and the non-EPS group according to the scale rating criteria and whether the anticholinergics have been used. The differences between demographic data and characters of drug intake were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors of EPS were selected between those factors. Correlation analysis was performed on the severity of schizophrenia (Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) score) and EPS scale (Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score) in 679 patients. The differences between the PANSS subscale score and the CDSS score between the EPS group and the non-EPS group were compared. Result Compared with the non-EPS group, the EPS group patients are older, and they have a longer duration since first prescribed antipsychotics. The EPS group patients have higher frequency of atypical antipsychotics polytherapy and typical and atypical antipsychotics polytherapy or combined treatments with mood stabilisers. Logistic regression analysis shows that antipsychotics with high D2 receptor antagonistic effect and illness duration are the risk factors of EPS. The SAS score was significantly correlated with PANSS negative score, PANSS general psychopathological score and PANSS total score. The BARS scale score was significantly correlated with PANSS positive score, PANSS general psychopathological score, PANSS total score and CDSS total score. The AIMS scale score was significantly correlated with PANSS negative score. Compared with the non-EPS group, the EPS group patients have significantly higher PANSS negative score, PANSS general psychopathological score, PANSS total score and CDSS total score. Conclusion Antipsychotic drugs with high D2 receptor antagonism and disease duration are risk factors of EPS in Chinese patients with schizophrenia. The severity of various types of EPS is significantly correlated with the psychiatric and mood symptoms of schizophrenia, and psychiatric symptoms and mood symptoms were significantly more severe in the EPS group. The occurrence of EPS is associated with poor treatment outcome of schizophrenia.

Mental disorders are now recognized as leading causes of morbidity, and they require a great deal of long-term medical and social care.¹ The results of numerous family, twin, and adoption studies conclude that genetic factors, rather than shared environment, play a major role in common mental disorders.¹

Objective: Model-based meta-analysis was used to describe the time-course and dose-effect relationships of antidepressants and also simultaneously investigate the impact of various factors on drug efficacy.Methods: This study is a reanalysis of a published network meta-analysis. Only placebo-controlled trials were included in this study. The change rate in depression rating scale scores from baseline was used as an efficacy indicator because a continuous variable is more likely to reflect subtle differences in efficacy between drugs.Results: A total 230 studies containing 64 346 patients were included in the analysis. The results showed that the number of study sites (single or multi-center) and the type of setting (inpatient or noninpatient) are important factors affecting the efficacy of antidepressants. After deducting the placebo effect, the maximum pure drug efficacy value of inpatients was 18.4% higher than that of noninpatients, and maximum pure drug efficacy value of single-center trials was 10.2% higher than that of multi-central trials. Amitriptyline showed the highest drug efficacy. The remaining 18 antidepressants were comparable or had little difference. Within the approved dose range, no significant dose-response relationship was observed. However, the time-course relationship is obvious for all antidepressants. In terms of safety, with the exception of amitriptyline, the dropout rate due to adverse events of other drugs was not more than 10% higher than that of the placebo group.Conclusion: The number of study sites and the type of setting are significant impact factors for the efficacy of antidepressants. Except for amitriptyline, the other 18 antidepressants have little difference in efficacy and safety.