Peter Balcarek

Dr. Peter Balcarek

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 October 2016 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPeter Balcarek
Peter Balcarek
SRStephan Rehn
Stephan Rehn
NHNick R. Howells
Nick R. Howells
JEJonathan D. Eldridge
Jonathan D. Eldridge
KKKeisuke Kita
Keisuke Kita
TFTim Friede
Tim Friede

1 February 2021 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDaphne I. Ling
Daphne I. Ling
JBJacqueline M. Brady
Jacqueline M. Brady
EAElizabeth Arendt
Elizabeth Arendt
MTMarc Tompkins
Marc Tompkins
JAJulie Agel
Julie Agel
BSBeth E. Shubin Stein
Beth E. Shubin Stein
Background: Nonoperative treatment after first-time patellar dislocation is the standard of care. There is evidence that certain patients may be at high risk for recurrent instability. The aim of this study was to develop a multivariable model to guide management of patients based on their individual risk of recurrent dislocation. Methods: A multivariable model was developed using 291 patients from 4 institutions to identify which patients were at higher risk for recurrent patellar dislocation within 2 years. This model was informed by a univariable logistic regression model developed to test factors based on the patient’s history, physical examination, and imaging. The discriminatory ability of the model to classify who will or will not have a recurrent dislocation was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Age, a history of a contralateral patellar dislocation, skeletal immaturity, lateral patellar tilt, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, Insall-Salvati ratio, and trochlear dysplasia were the most important factors for recurrent patellar dislocation. Sex, mechanism of injury, Caton-Deschamps ratio, sulcus angle, inclination angle, and facet ratio were not factors for recurrent dislocation. The overall AUC for the multivariable model was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64.7% to 76.6%). Conclusions: Optimizing the management of lateral patellar dislocation will improve short-term disability from the dislocation and reduce the long-term risk of patellofemoral arthritis from repeated chondral injury. This multivariable model can identify patients who are at high risk for recurrent dislocation and would be good candidates for early operative treatment. Further validation of this model in a prospective cohort of patients will inform whether it can be used to determine the optimal treatment plan for patients presenting with an initial patellar dislocation. Until validation of the model is done with new patients, it should not be used in clinical practice. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

21 July 2015 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPeter Balcarek
Peter Balcarek
TWTim Alexander Walde
Tim Alexander Walde
Background: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is an established operative procedure for patients with recurrent episodes of lateral patellar instability. However, recent articles have reported remarkable complication rates, with nonanatomic femoral tunnel positioning in up to 64% of patients. Purpose: To evaluate the sensitivity of femoral tunnel placement using lateral fluoroscopic guidance to minor degrees of deviation from the true-lateral view using established radiographic landmarks. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Six human cadaveric femora were used for this study. A 6-mm radiopaque eyelet was used to mark the native femoral insertion of the MPFL according to previously described radiographic landmarks. Radiographic landmarks were also applied with the femur positioned in 2.5° and 5° of internal and external rotation, respectively, and with the femur in 2.5° and 5° of hip abduction and adduction, respectively. The distance between the center of the 6-mm eyelet to the center of the native femoral MPFL insertion, as established in the true-lateral view, was measured and determined as the degree of shift in each position. Results: Hip adduction, abduction, and internal and external rotations of 2.5° resulted in a shift from the native femoral MPFL insertion point to a more distal (adduction), proximal (abduction), anterior (internal rotation), and posterior location (external rotation) of 2.7 ± 0.7, 2.0 ± 0.7, 2.7 ± 1.1, and 3.0 ± 1.3 mm, respectively (all P < .05). Malpositioning increased to a distance of 5.0 ± 0.7 mm distally, 3.6 ± 1.0 mm proximally, 5.2 ± 0.8 mm anteriorly, and 6.2 ± 0.6 mm posteriorly to the native insertion point when the attachment was marked with 5° of divergence from the true-lateral view (all P < .05). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate the high sensitivity of femoral tunnel placement using lateral fluoroscopic guidance to minor degrees of deviation from the true-lateral view. Clinical Relevance: The study highlights the importance of an exact lateral view when fluoroscopic guidance is used for femoral tunnel positioning in the daily practice of MPFL reconstruction, and a possible explanation for the high incidence of nonanatomic tunnel placement is suggested.

1 March 2019 in Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PBPeter Balcarek
Peter Balcarek
TRTobias Radebold
Tobias Radebold
XSXenia Schulz
Xenia Schulz
DVDennis Vogel
Dennis Vogel
The clinical impact of increased torsion on patellar instability and patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) has been suggested by several studies. The hypotheses of this study were that (1) torsional malalignment (TM) is characterized by a positive correlation between different malalignment parameters that represent an overall picture of the malalignment syndrome and (2) an increase in overall torsion is the underlying difference between patellar instability and isolated patellofemoral pain. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Between April 2015 and July 2017, a total of 428 patients were treated for lateral patellar dislocation (LPD), and 333 patients were treated for PFPS. Sixty-two patients (14.5%) with patellar instability (LPD group) and 29 patients (8.7%) with patellofemoral pain (PFPS group) had additional TM and were included in this study. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging for torsional alignment and patellar tracking, including femoral antetorsion, tibial torsion, knee rotation, tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance, Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia, lateral trochlear inclination (LTI) angle, and patellar height. The LPD and PFPS groups differed significantly in terms of trochlear dysplasia (P < .001), LTI angle (P < .001), and TT-TG distance (P = .0167) but did not differ in terms of femoral antetorsion (20.02° ± 8.80° vs 20.03° ± 7.91°, respectively; P = .8545), tibial torsion (39.53° ± 9.23° vs 41.24° ± 7.28°, respectively; P = .3616), or knee rotation (10.42° ± 5.16° vs 8.48° ± 7.81°, respectively; P = .0163). Only measures of TT-TG distance and TT-PCL distance and measures of TT-TG distance and knee rotation were positively correlated. Trochlear dysplasia (type B-D) was identified as the only significant predictor of patellar instability. TM in patients with either PFPS or LPD does not appear to be characterized by a fixed constellation of different malalignment parameters. Between groups, the parameters differed significantly only in terms of trochlear dysplasia and the TT-TG distance, and trochlear dysplasia (type B-D) (but not torsion) was identified as a predictor of lateral patellar instability.

6 October 2018 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FZFelix Zimmermann
Felix Zimmermann
MLMichael C. Liebensteiner
Michael C. Liebensteiner
PBPeter Balcarek
Peter Balcarek

10 February 2022 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNatalie Mengis
Natalie Mengis
FZFelix Zimmermann
Felix Zimmermann
LSLarissa Schemel
Larissa Schemel
JRJules N. Rippke
Jules N. Rippke
DMDanko D. Milinkovic
Danko D. Milinkovic
PBPeter Balcarek
Peter Balcarek
Background: There are few reports on the return to sports after complex patellar-stabilizing surgery. Purposes: To evaluate patients’ ability to return to sports and to investigate the extent to which the preoperative level of sports participation influences sports activity after deepening trochleoplasty (TP) and concomitant patellar-stabilizing procedures. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Between April 2015 and April 2019, 144 patellar-stabilizing procedures, including deepening TP and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction or medial reefing with and without concomitant realignment procedures, were carried out in 142 patients. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and the Tegner activity score were used to assess patients’ quality of life and sports activity level. In addition, a numerical analog scale was used to evaluate patellofemoral pain intensity during rest and activity and subjective knee joint function. Results: Outcomes were available for 111 patients (112 knees) (male/female, 77/34; mean age, 23.4 ± 7.8 years), yielding a 77.7% follow-up rate at a mean of 39.2 ± 9.9 months (range, 24-48 months). Two-thirds of the patients returned to their preoperative level of activity or higher, but their Tegner scores did not change significantly (4.5 ± 2.4 vs 4.7 ± 1.6; P = .365). Low-level athletes (preoperative Tegner score 0-4) participated at a higher level of sports activity (2.7 ± 1.4 to 4.1 ± 1.2; P < .0001), whereas higher-level athletes (preoperative Tegner score 5-10) participated at a lower level (6.8 ± 1.3 to 5.5 ± 1.7; P < .0001). The likelihood of returning to the preoperative activity level (Tegner score) was significantly higher in the low-level activity group than in the high-level activity group ( P = .0001; 95% CI, 4.055-27.05; odds ratio, 10.47). All of the patient-reported outcome measures improved postoperatively, independent of the patients’ age, sex, and body mass index. Conclusion: Patients undergoing deepening TP and medial soft tissue stabilization with or without concomitant realignment surgery for complex patellar instability can expect good clinical results and a high rate of return to sports participation, with two-thirds of patients returning to their preoperative Tegner-level of activity or higher. However, higher-level athletes should be informed that their likelihood of returning to sports at the preoperative level or full participation at a competitive level is reduced.