Nicole Gottdenker

Dr. Nicole Gottdenker

Department of Veterinary Pathology, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 May 2014 in Ecohealth
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NGNicole Gottdenker
Nicole Gottdenker
DSDaniel Streicker
Daniel Streicker
CFChristina Faust
Christina Faust
CCC. R. Carroll
C. R. Carroll

21 February 2018 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CFChristina Faust
Christina Faust
HMHamish I McCallum
Hamish I McCallum
LBLaura S P Bloomfield
Laura S P Bloomfield
NGNicole Gottdenker
Nicole Gottdenker
TGThomas Gillespie
Thomas Gillespie
RPRaina K Plowright
Raina K Plowright

1 June 2011 in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JRJorge Eduardo Rabinovich
Jorge Eduardo Rabinovich
UKUriel Dan Kitron
Uriel Dan Kitron
YOYamila Obed
Yamila Obed
MYMiho Yoshioka
Miho Yoshioka
NGNicole Gottdenker
Nicole Gottdenker
LCLuis Fernando Chaves
Luis Fernando Chaves
Host use by vectors is important in understanding the transmission of zoonotic diseases, which can affect humans, wildlife and domestic animals. Here, a synthesis of host exploitation patterns by kissing-bugs, vectors of Chagas disease, is presented. For this synthesis, an extensive literature review restricted to feeding sources analysed by precipitin tests was conducted. Modern tools from community ecology and multivariate statistics were used to determine patterns of segregation in host use. Rather than innate preferences for host species, host use by kissing-bugs is influenced by the habitats they colonise. One of the major limitations of studies on kissing-bug foraging has been the exclusive focus on the dominant vector species. We propose that expanding foraging studies to consider the community of vectors will substantially increase the understanding of Chagas disease transmission ecology. Our results indicate that host accessibility is a major factor that shapes the blood-foraging patterns of kissing-bugs. Therefore, from an applied perspective, measures that are directed at disrupting the contact between humans and kissing-bugs, such as housing improvement, are among the most desirable strategies for Chagas disease control.

15 November 2012 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NGNicole Gottdenker
Nicole Gottdenker
LCLuis Fernando Chaves
Luis Fernando Chaves
JCJosé E. Calzada
José E. Calzada
ASAzael Saldaña
Azael Saldaña
CCC. Ronald Carroll
C. Ronald Carroll
Anthropogenic land use may influence transmission of multi-host vector-borne pathogens by changing diversity, relative abundance, and community composition of reservoir hosts. These reservoir hosts may have varying competence for vector-borne pathogens depending on species-specific characteristics, such as life history strategy. The objective of this study is to evaluate how anthropogenic land use change influences blood meal species composition and the effects of changing blood meal species composition on the parasite infection rate of the Chagas disease vector Rhodnius pallescens in Panama. R. pallescens vectors (N = 643) were collected in different habitat types across a gradient of anthropogenic disturbance. Blood meal species in DNA extracted from these vectors was identified in 243 (40.3%) vectors by amplification and sequencing of a vertebrate-specific fragment of the 12SrRNA gene, and T. cruzi vector infection was determined by pcr. Vector infection rate was significantly greater in deforested habitats as compared to contiguous forests. Forty-two different species of blood meal were identified in R. pallescens, and species composition of blood meals varied across habitat types. Mammals (88.3%) dominated R. pallescens blood meals. Xenarthrans (sloths and tamanduas) were the most frequently identified species in blood meals across all habitat types. A regression tree analysis indicated that blood meal species diversity, host life history strategy (measured as rmax, the maximum intrinsic rate of population increase), and habitat type (forest fragments and peridomiciliary sites) were important determinants of vector infection with T. cruzi. The mean intrinsic rate of increase and the skewness and variability of rmax were positively associated with higher vector infection rate at a site. In this study, anthropogenic landscape disturbance increased vector infection with T. cruzi, potentially by changing host community structure to favor hosts that are short-lived with high reproductive rates. Study results apply to potential environmental management strategies for Chagas disease. Understanding how host species influence vector-borne pathogen transmission in anthropogenically disturbed landscapes is important to predicting and preventing disease transmission. This study evaluates how host diversity, anthropogenic land use change, and host life history influence vector- borne multihost pathogen transmission in Panama, where the triatomine bug Rhodnius pallescens is the principal vector of Trypanosoma cruzi, agent of Chagas disease. We hypothesize that blood meal species composition and vector infection differ as a function of habitat disturbance, and that the host species intrinsic rate of increase is positively associated with T. cruzi vector infection. We collected R. pallescens across a gradient of anthropogenic disturbance. Blood meal species composition and T. cruzi vector infection were determined by molecular methods. Vector infection rates were higher in deforested habitats and forest fragments as compared to contiguous forests. Vectors fed primarily on mammals, likely accounting for a relatively high vector infection prevalence, and that host blood meal species composition varied across habitat types. Regression tree analysis demonstrates that higher T. cruzi vector infection indices we associated with sites that had blood meal species with higher, more variable, and more skewed rmax (intrinsic rates of increase) values, lower blood meal species diversity, and disturbed habitats, namely fragmented forests and peridomiciliary sites.

1 November 2015 in Acta Tropica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFernando Abad-Franch
Fernando Abad-Franch
MLMarli M. Lima
Marli M. Lima
OSOtília Sarquis
Otília Sarquis
RGRodrigo Gurgel-Gonçalves
Rodrigo Gurgel-Gonçalves
MSMaría Sánchez-Martín
María Sánchez-Martín
NGNicole Gottdenker
Nicole Gottdenker

24 April 2017 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CFChristina Faust
Christina Faust
ADAndrew P. Dobson
Andrew P. Dobson
NGNicole Gottdenker
Nicole Gottdenker
LBLaura S.P. Bloomfield
Laura S.P. Bloomfield
HMHamish I. McCallum
Hamish I. McCallum
RPRaina Plowright
Raina Plowright
As biodiversity declines with anthropogenic land-use change, it is increasingly important to understand how changing biodiversity affects infectious disease risk. The dilution effect hypothesis, which points to decreases in biodiversity as critical to an increase in infection risk, has received considerable attention due to the allure of a win–win scenario for conservation and human well-being. Yet some empirical data suggest that the dilution effect is not a generalizable phenomenon. We explore the response of pathogen transmission dynamics to changes in biodiversity that are driven by habitat loss using an allometrically scaled multi-host model. With this model, we show that declining habitat, and thus declining biodiversity, can lead to either increasing or decreasing infectious-disease risk, measured as endemic prevalence. Whether larger habitats, and thus greater biodiversity, lead to a decrease (dilution effect) or increase (amplification effect) in infection prevalence depends upon the pathogen transmission mode and how host competence scales with body size. Dilution effects were detected for most frequency-transmitted pathogens and amplification effects were detected for density-dependent pathogens. Amplification effects were also observed over a particular range of habitat loss in frequency-dependent pathogens when we assumed that host competence was greatest in large-bodied species. By contrast, only amplification effects were observed for density-dependent pathogens; host competency only affected the magnitude of the effect. These models can be used to guide future empirical studies of biodiversity–disease relationships across gradients of habitat loss. The type of transmission, the relationship between host competence and community assembly, the identity of hosts contributing to transmission, and how transmission scales with area are essential factors to consider when elucidating the mechanisms driving disease risk in shrinking habitat. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Conservation, biodiversity and infectious disease: scientific evidence and policy implications'.