Mediastinal paraganglioms are rare, highly vascularized tumors arising from chromaffin tissue located in the para-aortic ganglia. Tumors tend to invade bordering structures and may also form metastasis. Up to 50% of patients are asymptomatic and diagnosis is incidental. Presenting symptoms are related to catecholamine hypersecretion or to a mass effect. Complete surgical resection remains the standard of care due to malignant potential of the tumor and poor response to chemotherapy or radiation. Strategic location of the tumor in proximity to great vessels, trachea, and recurrent laryngeal nerve poses challenge for the surgeon. We report a case of a 59-year old asymptomatic female who was incidentally diagnosed with a middle mediastinal mass on a positron-emission tomography (PET-CT) scan performed as part of breast cancer surveillance. Complete resection of the tumor was achieved using cardiopulmonary bypass. The patient recovered uneventfully and in a ten-month follow up there is no evidence of recurrence.

Background & Objectives: Primary chest wall sarcomas are rare and therapeutically challenging tumors. Herein we report the outcomes of a surgery-based multimodality therapy for these pathologies over an 11-year period. In addition, we present a case that illustrates the surgical challenges that extensive chest wall resection may pose.Methods: Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons general thoracic surgery database, we have prospectively collected data in our institute on all patients undergoing chest wall resection and reconstruction for primary chest wall sarcomas between June 2008–October 2019.Results: We performed 28 surgical procedures on 25 patients aged 5 to 91 years (median age 33). Eleven tumors were bone- and cartilage-derived and 14 tumors originated from soft tissue elements. Seven patients (7/25, 28%) received neo-adjuvant therapy and 14 patients (14/25, 56%) received adjuvant therapy. The median number of ribs that were resected was 2.5 (range 0 to 6). In 18/28 (64%) of surgeries, additional skeletal or visceral organs were removed, including: diaphragm [1], scapula [2], sternum [2], lung [2], vertebra [1], clavicle [1] and colon [1]. Chest wall reconstruction was deemed necessary in 16/28 (57%) of cases, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Gore-Tex patches was used in 13/28 (46%) of cases and biological flaps where used in 4/28 (14%) of cases. R0, R1 and R2 resection margins were achieved in 19/28 (68%), 9/28 (32%) and 0/28 (0%) of cases, respectively. The median follow up time was 33 months (range 2 to 138). During the study period, disease recurred in 8/25 (32%) of patients. Of these, 3 were re-operated on and are free of disease. At date of last follow up, 5/25 (20%) of patients have died due to their disease and in contrast, 20/25 (80%) were alive with no evidence of disease.Conclusions: Surgery-based multimodality therapy is an effective treatment approach for primary chest wall sarcomas. Resection of additional skeletal or visceral organs and reconstruction with synthetic and/or biological flaps is often required in order to obtain R0 resection margins. Ultimately, long-term survival in this clinical scenario is an achievable goal.

Background: The role of sub lobar resection (SLR; either segmentectomy or wedge resection) vs lobectomy (LBCT) for invasive clinical stage T1N0 non‐small‐cell‐lung‐cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully established yet.Aim: We aimed to characterize the preoperative parameters leading to selecting SLR and compare the overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) of these two surgical approaches.Methods: Clinical data on 162 patients (LBCT‐107; SLR‐55) were prospectively entered in our departmental database. Preoperative parameters associated with the performance of SLR were identified using univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to compute OS and DFS. Comparison between LBCT and SLR groups and 32 propensity‐matched groups was performed using Log‐rank test.Results: Median follow‐up time for the LBCT and SLR groups was 4.76 (Inter‐quartile range [IQR] 2.96 to 8.23) and 3.38 (IQR 2.9 to 6.19) years respectively. OS and DFS rates were similar between the two groups in the entire cohort (OS‐LBCT vs SLR P = .853, DSF‐LBCT vs SLR P = .653) and after propensity matching (OS‐LBCT vs SLR P = .563 DSF‐LBCT vs SLR P = .632). Specifically, Two‐ and five‐year OS rates for LBCT and SLR were 90.6.% vs 92.7%, 71.8% vs 75.9% respectively. Independent predictors of selecting for SLR included older age (P < .001), reduced FEV1% (P = .026), smaller tumor size (P = .025), smaller invasive component (P = .021) and higher American Society of Anesthesiology scores (P = .014).Conclusions: In 162 consecutive and 32 matched cases, SLR and lobar resection had similar overall and disease‐free survival rates. SLR may be considered as a reasonable oncological procedure in carefully selected T1N0 NSCLC patients that present with multiple comorbidities and relatively small tumors.

Objectives: Lung neuroendocrine tumors (LNETs) are rare, comprising 1–2% of lung cancers. This study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after lobar resection versus sublobar resection for LNETs and to identify factors associated with prognosis and resection extent. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with clinical stage I (T ≤ 4 cm, N0M0) typical or atypical carcinoid who underwent curative resection at Hadassah Medical Center and Kaplan medical Center between 2010 and 2024. Results: Seventy patients (mean age 56.8 ± 16 years; 63% female) were included. Lobar resection was performed in 40 (57%) and sublobar resection in 30 (43%; 15 segmentectomies, 15 wedge resections). Pathology revealed 50 typical carcinoid (71.43%) and 20 atypical carcinoid (28.57%). Final pathological stage was I in 57 patients (81.42%), II in 9 (12.86%), and III in 4 (5.71%), reflecting surgical upstaging in 13 patients (18.57%), all due to nodal involvement. Atypical carcinoid was associated with worse RFS, nodal upstaging, and adjuvant therapy (all p < 0.01). Patients undergoing sublobar resection were older, had higher comorbidity scores, more frequently presented with peripheral tumors, and underwent less frequent lymph node assessment (all p < 0.01). At a median follow-up of 3.8 years for OS and 2.0 years for RFS, survival rates were 95.7% for both. Neither OS, RFS, nor postoperative normalization of plasma pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRPp) levels differed significantly between lobar resection and sublobar resection (p = 0.94, p = 0.42, and p = 0.205, respectively). Conclusions: Sublobar resection may represent an acceptable surgical option for selected patients with clinical stage I LNETs, particularly for peripheral tumors ≤ 2 cm in older or comorbid patients. The high rate of nodal upstaging underscores the need for lymph node assessment, irrespective of resection extent.