This study situates washed sheep-wool fibres as a sustainable reinforcement candidate for epoxy matrices and evaluates their mechanical response under tensile, flexural, compressive, and Charpy impact loading. The objective of this work is to assess whether short, washed sheep-wool fibres can function as a sustainable reinforcement for epoxy matrices, and to identify optimal fibre length–content windows that improve mechanical behaviour for engineering applications. Moulded–machined specimens were produced with fibre lengths of 3, 6, and 10 mm and contents of 1.0–5.0 wt.%, depending on the test; neat epoxy served as the reference. In tension, selected formulations—particularly 10 mm/1.5 wt.%—showed simultaneous increases in ultimate stress and modulus relative to the neat resin, corresponding to gains of about 10% in ultimate tensile stress and 50% in tensile modulus, at the expense of ductility. In flexure, the modulus decreases by roughly 15–35% compared with the matrix, whereas configurations with 3–6 mm at 2.5–5 wt.% raise the fracture stress by about 35–45% and improve post-peak resistance. In compression, reinforcement markedly elevates yield stress, with increases of up to about 160% at 3 mm/2 wt.%, while the ultimate strain decreases moderately. In Charpy impact, all reinforced materials underperform the resin, with absorbed energy reduced by roughly 75–93% depending on fibre length and content, with 3 mm/1 wt.% being the least affected. A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that fibre length primarily governs tensile and compressive behaviour, while fibre content dominates flexural and impact responses. Overall, the findings support wool fibres as a viable reinforcement when length and content are optimized, pointing to their use in non-structural to semi-structural industrial components such as interior panels, housings, casings, protective covers, and other parts where moderate tensile/compressive performance is sufficient and material sustainability is prioritised.

Sheep wool is a low-value agricultural by-product with potential to contribute to more sustainable cementitious materials. This study investigates Segureña sheep wool fibres as reinforcement in cement mortars, comparing washed wool (W) and cement-encapsulated wool (E) at the same oven-dry raw wool dosages (0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 g per batch), and benchmarking against polypropylene (PP) fibres. Flexural and compressive strength were evaluated at 1, 7, and 28 days, whereas apparent density, water absorption, and thermal conductivity were assessed at 28 days. An intermediate dosage (1.0 g per batch) provided the most favourable mechanical response, while the highest dosage (3.0 g per batch) reduced performance, plausibly due to dispersion limitations and void formation. At 28 days, W-1 reached 9.65 ± 0.50 MPa in flexure (very close to PP-1) and 59.70 ± 1.05 MPa in compression, exceeding PP-1 in compression. Wool incorporation also reduced apparent density and yielded an observed reduction in thermal conductivity of up to ~18% at the highest dosage (single specimen per series). Overall, optimally dosed washed wool can deliver competitive mechanical performance while improving thermal behaviour, supporting circular-economy valorisation of waste wool in eco-mortars.

Sheep wool is a keratin-based natural fiber increasingly explored as a low-impact reinforcement and multifunctional modifier in composites, enabling valorization of coarse or waste wool streams. This systematic review consolidates evidence on raw or minimally processed wool-reinforced composites across polymer matrices and mineral binders. Following a registered protocol and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for English-language journal articles (2015–2025), yielding 44 included studies after screening. Evidence mapping shows polymers dominate (33/44; thermosets 19/44), while mineral binders account for 11/44. Wool is mainly used as short fibers (27/44), with woven (9/44) and nonwoven/felt (8/44) architectures appearing in laminates and insulation products. Because heterogeneity limits pooled meta-analysis, outcomes are synthesized using matched-control comparisons where available (27/44) and interpreted with a TRiC appraisal (Transparency, Reproducibility, and Credibility). Mechanical effects are highly conditional: gains in impact/energy absorption and occasional tensile/flexural stress improvements coexist with frequent losses linked to dispersion, wetting/impregnation and void sensitivity. Functional trends are similarly system-dependent, with promising but uneven evidence for acoustic performance, variable thermal conductivity shifts, and formulation-driven fire behavior. Moisture uptake and durability emerge as principal translation bottlenecks, motivating minimum reporting and design practices to improve comparability and application readiness.

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) enables low-cost and flexible production of PLA parts; however, achieving highly water-repellent surfaces without post-processing remains challenging due to the inherent process-induced texture and the sensitivity to formulation and printing conditions. This work evaluates whether incorporating fluoropolymers (PTFE or FEP) as fillers in PLA filaments can enhance repellency while maintaining printability and overall performance. Composite filaments (PTFE 1–40 wt%; FEP 1–50 wt%) were extruded and printed under constant parameters; wettability, roughness, water absorption, geometric stability, and tensile behavior were characterized, and a two-factor ANOVA was applied. On the bottom face, the water contact angle increased from 66.2° (PLA) to > 120° (40 wt% FEP) and 116.5° (40 wt% PTFE), while the sliding angle (50 µL) decreased from 19.7° to 12.9° (40 wt% PTFE) and 13.8° (40 wt% FEP). Roughness decreased (Ra 33 to 6–8 μm; Rz 150 to < 40 μm) and water uptake at 120 h dropped from 7.2% to 1.8% (40 wt% PTFE) and 3.6% (50 wt% FEP). FEP maintained flatness (≤ 0.045 mm), whereas PTFE increased warpage (~ 0.25 mm at 40 wt%). ANOVA confirmed a significant effect of filler content on wettability and strength ( p ≤ 0.002) and of fluoropolymer type on dimensional deviation ( p = 0.026), with adjusted R² ≈ 80–97%. Overall, PTFE maximizes barrier/hydrophobicity at the expense of dimensional accuracy, whereas FEP better preserves geometric stability while still achieving high hydrophobicity.

As natural and anthropogenic hazards intensify, improving the performance of reinforced-concrete (RC) infrastructure within a resilience-oriented assessment framework while limiting environmental burdens has become an important challenge for sustainable construction. In this context, this study proposes an OpenBIM-based digital-twin methodology to compare two equivalent RC structural scenarios: a conventional solution and an alternative incorporating unprocessed waste sheep wool fibres into cementitious materials. Using an IFC-based model of a high-rise building, the workflow enables automated extraction of structural quantities and a consistent building-scale assessment of material use, environmental impacts, and circularity indicators. Laboratory evidence from the literature is translated into element-level performance criteria through a dual-factor selection strategy based on key structural properties and secondary indicators related to cracking and post-cracking behaviour. The results show that the wool-fibre alternative enables the incorporation of a relevant amount of waste wool into the structure while causing only negligible increases in embodied energy and carbon emissions relative to the conventional RC scenario. The selected formulations also maintain or improve the governing mechanical and serviceability-related factors, indicating potential benefits in crack control, toughness, and repairability. Overall, this methodology provides a reproducible pathway for linking laboratory-scale material innovation with building-scale digital assessment, supporting more sustainable and performance-aware decision-making in RC construction.