Clifford Kim

Mr. Clifford Kim

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington D.C., USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 July 2022 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VSVaughn Shirey
Vaughn Shirey
ELElise Larsen
Elise Larsen
ADAndra Doherty
Andra Doherty
CKClifford Kim
Clifford Kim
FAFaisal T. Al-Sulaiman
Faisal T. Al-Sulaiman
LRLeslie Ries
Leslie Ries
Here, we present the largest, global dataset of Lepidopteran traits, focusing initially on butterflies (ca. 12,500 species records). These traits are derived from field guides, taxonomic treatments, and other literature resources. We present traits on wing size, phenology,voltinism, diapause/overwintering stage, hostplant associations, and habitat affinities (canopy, edge, moisture, and disturbance). This dataset will facilitate comparative research on butterfly ecology and evolution and our goal is to inspire future research collaboration and the continued development of this dataset.

5 June 2024 in Georgetown Medical Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKClifford Kim
Clifford Kim
JAJoanna Marie H. Aguilar
Joanna Marie H. Aguilar
LHLaura Hidalgo
Laura Hidalgo
EKEmily Katz
Emily Katz
As a type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), in vitro fertilization (IVF) has been available for more than 4 decades, with the first successful birth using conventional IVF (C-IVF) occurring in 1978. C-IVF has become increasingly available and accessible over the years and is currently a widely used alternative treatment option for prospective parents experiencing infertility. In addition, science and technological advancements have given rise to other IVF techniques that allow families to choose the ART that best fits their personal and unique needs. Among the other IVF techniques, natural cycle IVF, mild stimulation IVF, and in vitro maturation are notable for being less disruptive to the female body and are referred to as minimally disruptive ARTs (MDARTs). However, deciding which MDART to choose is a complex and daunting task that precedes an already emotionally, financially, and physically taxing process. This review explores these modern ART strategies, including protocols, advantages, and limitations, as well as provides the MDART decision matrix that translates these considerations into a practical decision-making guide for patients seeking IVF.

8 December 2025 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKClifford Kim
Clifford Kim
NSNina Shelton
Nina Shelton
MSMadhav Samudrala
Madhav Samudrala
.S.Kush Savsani
.Kush Savsani
Sivanesan DakshanamurthySivanesan Dakshanamurthy
Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy
Personalized cancer vaccines are a key strategy for training the immune system to recognize and respond to tumor-specific antigens. Our earlier software release, AutoEpiCollect 1.0, was designed to accelerate the vaccine design process, but the identification of tumor-specific genetic variants remains a manual process and is highly burdensome. In this study, we introduce AutoEpiCollect 2.0, an improved version with integrated genetic analysis capabilities that automate the identification and prioritization of tumorigenic variants from individual tumor samples. AutoEpiCollect 2.0 connects with RNA sequencing and cross-references the resulting RNAseq data for efficient determination of cancer-specific and prognostic gene variants. Using AutoEpiCollect 2.0, we conducted two case studies to design personalized peptide vaccines for two distinct cancer types: cervical squamous cell carcinoma and breast carcinoma. Case 1 analyzed five cervical tumor samples from different stages, ranging from CIN1 to cervical cancer stage IIB. CIN3 was selected for detailed analysis due to its pre-invasive status and clinical relevance, as it is the earliest stage where patients typically present symptoms. Case 2 examined five breast tumor samples, including HER2-negative, ER-positive, PR-positive, and triple-negative subtypes. In three of these breast samples, the same epitope was identified and was synthesized by identical gene variants. This finding suggests the presence of shared antigenic targets across subtypes. We identified the top MHC class I and class II epitopes for both cancer types. In cervical carcinoma, the most immunogenic epitopes were found in proteins expressed by HSPG2 and MUC5AC. In breast carcinoma, epitopes with the highest potential were derived from proteins expressed by BRCA2 and AHNAK2. These epitopes were further validated through pMHC-TCR modeling analysis. Despite differences in cancer type and tumor subtype, both case studies successfully identified high-potential epitopes suitable for personalized vaccine design. The integration of AutoEpiCollect 2.0 streamlined the variant analysis workflow and reduced the time required to identify key tumor antigens. This study demonstrates the value of automated data integration in genomic analysis for cancer vaccine development. Furthermore, by applying RNAseq in a standardized workflow, the approach enables both patient-specific and population-level vaccine design, based on statistically frequent gene variants observed across tumor datasets. AutoEpiCollect 2.0 is freely available as a website based tool for user to design vaccine.