BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Aggressive resection for primary tumors of the spine are associated with a high rate of adverse events (AEs), but the impact of AEs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains unknown and is critical to the shared decision-making. Our primary objective was to assess the impact of surgical AEs on PROs using an international registry. Assessing the impact on clinical outcomes and identifying risk factors for AEs were our secondary objectives. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for a primary spinal tumor were selected through the Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network. Our primary outcome was the impact of AEs on PROs at 3 and 12 months after surgery (measured with Spinal Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire, Short-Form 36, and EuroQol 5 Dimension). We also assessed the impact on clinical outcomes (local control, surgical margins, readmission, reoperation, and mortality). We stratified our results according to severity of AEs, histology, and type of resection. RESULTS: 374 patients met inclusion criteria (219 males/155 females). The mean age of the cohort was 48.7 years. The most frequent histology was chordoma (37.3%) followed by chondrosarcoma (8.8%). Sixty-seven patients (17.9%) experienced at least 1 intraoperative AE and 117 patients (31.3%) had at least 1 postoperative AE within 3 months. Overall, 159 patients (42.5%) experienced AEs. The readmission rate was significantly higher in patients who experienced AEs (Any AE: 10.1% vs no AE: 1.9% within 3 months; P = <0.001). PROs were not significantly affected by AEs in most questionnaires. Local control, risk of reoperation, mortality, and achieving preplanned margins were similar between AE groups. CONCLUSION: The rate of surgical AEs is considerable in this population. Surgical AEs seem to be associated with a higher number of readmissions, but do not seem to result in significant differences in PROs or in a higher risk of reoperation, mortality, and failure to achieve preplanned margins.

Extradural malignant primary spinal tumors are rare and outcome data, especially for younger patients, is limited. In a worldwide (11 centers) study (Predictors of Mortality and Morbidity in the Surgical Management of Primary Tumors of the Spine study; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01643174) by the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor, patients surgically treated for primary tumors of the spine between 1992 and 2012, were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective database of their medical history. Medical history, tumor characteristics, diagnostics, treatments, cross-sectional survival, and local recurrences were analyzed. Sixty-eight cases (32 f; 36 m), at an average age of 18.6 ± 4.7 years at the time of diagnosis, were identified (median follow-up 2.9 years). The most common entities were Ewing’s sarcoma (42.6%). Of the patients, 28% had undergone previous spine tumor surgery in another center (84% with intralesional margins). Resection was considered “Enneking appropriate” (EA) in 47.8% of the cases. Of the patients, 77.9% underwent chemotherapy and 50% radiotherapy. A local recurrence occurred in 36.4%. Over a third of patients died within a 10-year follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier-analysis demonstrated statistically significant overall survival (p = 0.007) and local recurrence rates (p = 0.042) for tumors treated with EA surgery versus Enneking inappropriate surgery. Aggressive resection of extradural primary malignant spinal tumors combined with adjuvant therapy reveals low local recurrence rates and better outcomes overall in younger patients.

Study Design: Narrative Review. Objective: The management of spinal tumors requires a multi-disciplinary approach including surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. Surgical approaches typically require posterior segmental instrumentation to maintain long-term spinal stability. Carbon fiber reinforced pedicle screws (CFRP) are increasingly used in the oncologic setting due to reductions in both imaging artifacts and radiotherapy perturbations compared to titanium implants. We performed a review of the literature and highlight advantages and future areas of study for CFRP. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and identified 10 articles including 573 patients. Across all studies we reviewed patient demographics, tumor types treated, hardware-related features, complication rates, recurrence, survival, and follow-up. Results: Across 10 studies, a total of 1371 screws placed. Surgical and non-surgical complications were reported in 18.3% of patients. Disease progression at the surgical site was detected in 7.3% of patients. There was no significant difference in clinical or hardware complications between CFRP or titanium implants. The most frequent complication attributable to implanted CFRP hardware included screw breakage in 2.4% and loosening in 1.7% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: CFRP provide a unique tool in the setting of spinal oncology. With a safety profile comparable to titanium, we review the documented advantages of CFRP posterior implants compared to titanium, while also addressing their current limitations. Additionally, we highlight several areas of future research to identify the optimal patients who will achieve the greatest benefit of CFRP.

Introduction: En-bloc spondylectomy in the lumbar spine is a challenging procedure mainly due to a complex prevertebral anatomy. The aim of our study is to describe the anatomy of the diaphragmatic crura and surrounding vascular and neural structures which may be iatrogenically injured during the surgical resection. Materials and methods: Ten embalmed specimens were meticulously dissected. Widths of the diaphragmatic crura, abdominal aorta, cisterna chyli, thoracic duct, sympathetic trunks, and inferior vena cava as well as their distances from the midline were measured at nine levels (L1 to L4 vertebra and adjacent intervertebral discs). Results: The right crus was attached to the L2–L4 vertebral bodies and L2/3 intervertebral disc, while the left crus inserted onto L1–L3 vertebrae. The thoracic duct arose commonly at the level of L2 vertebra and overlaid the right crus at the L3 vertebra and L2/3-disc levels. The cisterna chyli was present in 70% of specimens and overlapped with the left crus at the same levels. Both sympathetic trunks emerged underneath the crura at the L1/2 discs or L1 vertebra level. The aorta overlapped with the crura at all levels. Conclusion: The L3 level appears to be the riskiest for spondylectomy due to the overlap of both diaphragmatic crura with the thoracic duct and cisterna chyli, respectively. Spondylectomy at the L2 level also brings the risk of lymphatic structures injury while injury to the left sympathetic trunk may be the main issue at the L1 level.

Purpose: Sacral tumours, both benign and malignant, often necessitate surgical removal (sacrectomy) to achieve optimal outcomes. However, this procedure disrupts the pelvic ring’s stability, potentially leading to pain and limited mobility. Methods: This article explores innovative approaches to reconstruct the sacrum and restore function in primary and secondary sacral tumours. Results: Beyond traditional bone graft-based spino-pelvic fixation, the paper delves into minimally invasive alternatives like robotic-assisted surgery which may be used especially as a palliative procedure in destructive lumbosacral junction metastases. This technique offers enhanced precision for implant placement and often a reduced surgical exposure, potentially improving patient recovery. Additionally, the article discusses the application of 3D-printed custom implants, precisely matched the patient’s anatomy to provide immediate structural support. It also explores the use of vascularised long bone flaps for pelvic reconstruction to achieve both stability and ambulation after sacrectomy. Additionally, it is necessary to mention the crucial role of soft tissue reconstruction using local flaps or free flaps from other body regions. Conclusion: By presenting these advancements in sacral reconstruction techniques, this article empowers surgeons to select an individualised approach for their patient. This personalised approach can optimise post-operative outcomes, allowing patients to regain function and improve their quality of life.

Study Design: Systematic Review. Objectives: Formalized terminology for pain experienced by spine cancer patients is lacking. The common descriptors of spine cancer pain as mechanical or non-mechanical is not exhaustive. Misdiagnosed spinal pain may lead to ineffective treatment recommendations for cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of pain terminology that may be relevant to spinal oncology patients. We provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of the existing evidence, not limited to the spine surgery literature, and subsequently consolidate these data into a practical, clinically relevant nomenclature for spine oncologists. Results: Our literature search identified 3515 unique citations. Through title and abstract screening, 3407 citations were excluded, resulting in 54 full-text citations for review. Pain in cancer patients is typically described as nociceptive pain (somatic vs visceral), neurologic pain and treatment related pain. Conclusions: We consolidate the terminology used in the literature and consolidated into clinically relevant nomenclature of biologic tumor pain, mechanical pain, radicular pain, neuropathic pain, and treatment related pain. This review helps standardize terminology for cancer-related pain which may help clinicians identify pain generators.