Michael Marks

Dr. Michael Marks

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMichael Marks
Michael Marks
PMPere Millat-Martinez
Pere Millat-Martinez
DODan Ouchi
Dan Ouchi
CRChrissy H Roberts
Chrissy H Roberts
AAAndrea Alemany
Andrea Alemany
OMOriol Mitjà
Oriol Mitjà

1 October 2020 in The Lancet Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJessica J Manson
Jessica J Manson
CCColin Crooks
Colin Crooks
MNMeena Naja
Meena Naja
ALAmanda Ledlie
Amanda Ledlie
BGBethan Goulden
Bethan Goulden
RTRachel S Tattersall
Rachel S Tattersall

1 July 2019 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DEDaniel Engelman
Daniel Engelman
PCPaul T Cantey
Paul T Cantey
MMMichael Marks
Michael Marks
ASAnthony W Solomon
Anthony W Solomon
ACAileen Y Chang
Aileen Y Chang
ASAndrew C Steer
Andrew C Steer
Scabies is a parasitic disease of the skin that disproportionately affects disadvantaged populations. The disease causes considerable morbidity and leads to severe bacterial infection and immune-mediated disease. Scientific advances from the past 5 years suggest that scabies is amenable to population-level control, particularly through mass drug administration. In recognition of these issues, WHO added scabies to the list of neglected tropical diseases in 2017. To develop a global control programme, key operational research questions must now be addressed. Standardised approaches to diagnosis and methods for mapping are required to further understand the burden of disease. The safety of treatments for young children, including with ivermectin and moxidectin, should be investigated. Studies are needed to inform optimum implementation of mass treatment, including the threshold for intervention, target, dosing, and frequency. Frameworks for surveillance, monitoring, and evaluation of control strategies are also necessary.
1

25 September 2020 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRishi K. Gupta
Rishi K. Gupta
MMMichael Marks
Michael Marks
TSThomas H. A. Samuels
Thomas H. A. Samuels
ALAkish Luintel
Akish Luintel
TRTommy Rampling
Tommy Rampling
MNMahdad Noursadeghi
Mahdad Noursadeghi
The number of proposed prognostic models for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is growing rapidly, but it is unknown whether any are suitable for widespread clinical implementation.We independently externally validated the performance of candidate prognostic models, identified through a living systematic review, among consecutive adults admitted to hospital with a final diagnosis of COVID-19. We reconstructed candidate models as per original descriptions and evaluated performance for their original intended outcomes using predictors measured at the time of admission. We assessed discrimination, calibration and net benefit, compared to the default strategies of treating all and no patients, and against the most discriminating predictors in univariable analyses.We tested 22 candidate prognostic models among 411 participants with COVID-19, of whom 180 (43.8%) and 115 (28.0%) met the endpoints of clinical deterioration and mortality, respectively. Highest areas under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves were achieved by the NEWS2 score for prediction of deterioration over 24 h (0.78, 95% CI 0.73–0.83), and a novel model for prediction of deterioration <14 days from admission (0.78, 95% CI 0.74–0.82). The most discriminating univariable predictors were admission oxygen saturation on room air for in-hospital deterioration (AUROC 0.76, 95% CI 0.71–0.81), and age for in-hospital mortality (AUROC 0.76, 95% CI 0.71–0.81). No prognostic model demonstrated consistently higher net benefit than these univariable predictors, across a range of threshold probabilities.Admission oxygen saturation on room air and patient age are strong predictors of deterioration and mortality among hospitalised adults with COVID-19, respectively. None of the prognostic models evaluated here offered incremental value for patient stratification to these univariable predictors.

19 January 2017 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OMOriol Mitjà
Oriol Mitjà
MMMichael Marks
Michael Marks
LBLaia Bertran
Laia Bertran
KKKarsor Kollie
Karsor Kollie
DADaniel Argaw
Daniel Argaw
KAKingsley Asiedu
Kingsley Asiedu

20 May 2019 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJonathan A. Polonsky
Jonathan A. Polonsky
ABAmrish Baidjoe
Amrish Baidjoe
ZKZhian N. Kamvar
Zhian N. Kamvar
ACAnne Cori
Anne Cori
KDKara Durski
Kara Durski
TJThibaut Jombart
Thibaut Jombart
Despite continued efforts to improve health systems worldwide, emerging pathogen epidemics remain a major public health concern. Effective response to such outbreaks relies on timely intervention, ideally informed by all available sources of data. The collection, visualization and analysis of outbreak data are becoming increasingly complex, owing to the diversity in types of data, questions and available methods to address them. Recent advances have led to the rise of outbreak analytics , an emerging data science focused on the technological and methodological aspects of the outbreak data pipeline, from collection to analysis, modelling and reporting to inform outbreak response. In this article, we assess the current state of the field. After laying out the context of outbreak response, we critically review the most common analytics components, their inter-dependencies, data requirements and the type of information they can provide to inform operations in real time. We discuss some challenges and opportunities and conclude on the potential role of outbreak analytics for improving our understanding of, and response to outbreaks of emerging pathogens. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: epidemic forecasting and control‘. This theme issue is linked with the earlier issue ‘Modelling infectious disease outbreaks in humans, animals and plants: approaches and important themes’.