Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) derived from the periodontal pathogenPorphyromonas gingivalishas been reported to differ structurally and functionally from enterobacterial LPS. These studies demonstrate that in contrast to protein-free enterobacterial LPS, a similarly purified preparation ofP. gingivalisLPS exhibited potent Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), rather than TLR4, agonist activity to elicit gene expression and cytokine secretion in murine macrophages and transfectants. More importantly, TLR2 stimulation by thisP. gingivalisLPS preparation resulted in differential expression of a panel of genes that are normally induced in murine macrophages byEscherichia coliLPS. These data suggest that (i)P. gingivalisLPS does not signal through TLR4 and (ii) signaling through TLR2 and through TLR4 differs quantitatively and qualitatively. Our data support the hypothesis that the shared signaling pathways elicited by TLR2 and by TLR4 agonists must diverge in order to account for the distinct patterns of inflammatory gene expression.

Significance: Excess Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) signaling has been implicated in numerous inflammatory diseases, yet there is no TLR2 inhibitor licensed for human use. Using computer-aided drug design (CADD), we identified a compound, C₁₆H₁₅NO₄(C29), and a derivative,ortho-vanillin, that inhibit TLR2 signaling in vitro and in vivo. Our findings also revealed unexpected differences between TLR2/1 and TLR2/6 signaling in mice vs. humans. Importantly, our data provide proof of principle that the CADD-targeted BB loop pocket residues are critical for TLR2 signaling and may be targeted therapeutically.

Proteinase-activated receptor 2 (PAR₂), a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor, is activated at inflammatory sites by proteolytic cleavage of its extracellular N terminus by trypsin-like enzymes, exposing a tethered, receptor-activating ligand. Synthetic agonist peptides (AP) that share the tethered ligand sequence also activate PAR₂, often measured by Ca²⁺ release. PAR₂ contributes to inflammation through activation of NF-κB-regulated genes; however, the mechanism by which this occurs is unknown. Overexpression of human PAR₂ in HEK293T cells resulted in concentration-dependent, PAR₂ AP-inducible NF-κB reporter activation that was protein synthesis-independent, yet blocked by inhibitors that uncouple G_i proteins or sequester intracellular Ca²⁺. Because previous studies described synergistic PAR₂- and TLR4-mediated cytokine production, we hypothesized that PAR₂ and TLR4 might interact at the level of signaling. In the absence of TLR4, PAR₂-induced NF-κB activity was inhibited by dominant negative (DN)-TRIF or DN-TRAM constructs, but not by DN-MyD88, findings confirmed using cell-permeable, adapter-specific BB loop blocking peptides. Co-expression of TLR4/MD-2/CD14 with PAR₂ in HEK293T cells led to a synergistic increase in AP-induced NF-κB signaling that was MyD88-dependent and required a functional TLR4, despite the fact that AP exhibited no TLR4 agonist activity. Co-immunoprecipitation of PAR₂ and TLR4 revealed a physical association that was AP-dependent. The response to AP or lipopolysaccharide was significantly diminished in TLR4^–/– and PAR ^–/–₂ macrophages, respectively, and SW620 colonic epithelial cells exhibited synergistic responses to co-stimulation with AP and lipopolysaccharide. Our data suggest a unique interaction between two distinct innate immune response receptors and support a novel paradigm of receptor cooperativity in inflammatory responses.

Engagement of Toll-like receptor (TLR) proteins activates multiple signal transduction pathways. These studies show that engagement of TLR2 and TLR4 leads to rapid phosphorylation of the transcription factor STAT1 at serine 727 (Ser-727 STAT1) in murine macrophages. Only TLR4 engagement induced STAT1 phosphorylation at tyrosine 701, although this response was delayed compared with Ser-727 STAT1 phosphorylation. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase using LY294002 blocked TLR4-induced STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation, but this inhibitor had no effect on STAT1 serine phosphorylation. TLR-induced phosphorylation of Ser-727 STAT1 could be blocked by the selective p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor SB203580. However, activation of p38 was not sufficient to induce Ser-727 STAT1 phosphorylation in macrophages. TLR2-induced activation of Ser-727 STAT1 phosphorylation required the adapter protein MyD88, whereas TLR4-induced activation of Ser-727 STAT1 phosphorylation was not solely dependent on MyD88. Lastly, TLR4-induced activation of Ser-727 STAT1 phosphorylation could be blocked by rottlerin, a specific inhibitor of protein kinase C-δ. In contrast, rottlerin had no effect on STAT1 phosphorylation induced via TLR2. Together, these data demonstrate that activation STAT1 tyrosine and serine phosphorylation are distinct consequences of TLR engagement in murine macrophages. Furthermore, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, protein kinase C-δ, and a novel TLR2-specific signaling pathway appear to be necessary to induce Ser-727 STAT1 phosphorylation.

TLRs sense pathogens and transmit intracellular signals via the use of specific adapter proteins. We designed a set of “blocking peptides” (BPs) comprised of the 14 aa that correspond to the sequences of the BB loops of the four known Toll-IL-1 resistance (TIR) domain-containing adapter proteins (i.e., MyD88, TIR domain-containing adapter inducing IFN-β (TRIF), TRIF-related adapter molecule (TRAM), and TIR-domain containing adapter protein (TIRAP)) linked to the cell-penetrating segment of the antennapedia homeodomain. LPS (TLR4)-mediated gene expression, as well as MAPK and transcription factor activation associated with both MyD88-dependent and -independent signaling pathways, were disrupted by all four BPs (TRAM ≈ MyD88 > TRIF > TIRAP), but not by a control peptide. In contrast, none of the BPs inhibited TLR2-mediated activation of MAPKs. Only the MyD88 BP significantly blocked Pam3Cys-induced IL-1β mRNA; however, the inhibitory effect was much less than observed for LPS. Our data suggest that the interactions required for a fully functional TLR4 signaling “platform” are disrupted by these BPs, and that the adapter BB loops may serve distinct roles in TLR4 and TLR2 signalosome assembly.