Background: HPV vaccination reduces the risk of anogenital warts, high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+), and cervical cancer. To enhance immunogenicity, HPV vaccines include adjuvants such as toll-like receptor agonists, which may theoretically trigger autoimmune responses. However, existing data on this risk remain conflicting. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the association between HPV vaccination and autoimmune disease onset in post-licensure controlled studies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024606834). Results: A total of 356 studies were identified, including cross-reference reviews. Fourteen met inclusion criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis, encompassing 8,088,838 patients, of whom 2,041,865 received the HPV vaccine. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found no significant association between HPV vaccination and autoimmune disease development. However, further large-scale observational studies are needed, particularly among male recipients, as current evidence is predominantly based on female populations. Future research should also evaluate risks for specific autoimmune disorders to refine the vaccine’s safety profile.

Background and Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory disease with multifactorial pathogenesis. Increasing evidence suggests that alterations in the gut and reproductive tract microbiota may contribute to disease development, progression, and associated symptoms through immune, hormonal, and metabolic mechanisms. This systematic review aimed to synthesize current human evidence on microbiota composition and function in women with endometriosis. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Observational human studies published in English between January 2015 and September 2025 evaluating gut, vaginal, cervical, endometrial, or peritoneal microbiota in women with endometriosis were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and performed a qualitative synthesis due to methodological heterogeneity. Results: Nineteen studies were included, encompassing gut and reproductive tract samples analyzed primarily by 16S rRNA sequencing. Across cohorts, endometriosis was consistently associated with microbial dysbiosis characterized by enrichment of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes and depletion of Bacteroidetes, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium. Increased abundance of opportunistic taxa, particularly Escherichia coli, Streptococcus, and Klebsiella, was frequently reported. Functionally, dysbiosis was linked to increased β glucuronidase activity, enhanced estrogen enterohepatic recirculation, reduced short-chain fatty acid production, and activation of pro-inflammatory immune pathways. Several studies reported correlations between microbial profiles, disease stage, pelvic pain, and infertility. Conclusions: Current evidence supports a reproducible association between gut microbiota dysbiosis and endometriosis. Altered microbial composition and function may contribute to chronic inflammation, hormonal imbalance, and disease persistence. Longitudinal and multi-omic studies are needed to clarify causality and to evaluate microbiota-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) accounts for 15–20% of all epithelial ovarian tumors. Concerns have arisen about the clinical and prognostic implications of BOT with exophytic growth patterns. We retrospectively reviewed all cases of BOT patients surgically treated from 2015 to 2020. Patients were divided into an endophytic pattern (with intracystic tumor growth and intact ovarian capsule) and an exophytic pattern (with tumor growth outside the ovarian capsule) group. Among the 254 patients recruited, 229 met the inclusion criteria, and of these, 169 (73.8%) belonged to the endophytic group. The endophytic group showed more commonly an early FIGO stage than the exophytic group (100.0% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, tumor cells in peritoneal washing (20.0% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001), elevated Ca125 levels (51.7% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.003), peritoneal implants (0 vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001), and invasive peritoneal implants (0 vs. 5%, p = 0.003) were more frequently observed in the exophytic group. The survival analysis showed 15 (6.6%) total recurrences, 9 (5.3%) in the endophytic and 6 (10.0%) patients in the exophytic group (p = 0.213). At multivariable analysis, age (p = 0.001), FIGO stage (p = 0.002), fertility-sparing surgery (p = 0.001), invasive implants (p = 0.042), and tumor spillage (p = 0.031) appeared significantly associated with recurrence. Endophytic and exophytic patterns in borderline ovarian tumors show superimposable recurrence rates and disease-free survival.

(1) Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) represents a feasible approach in early-stage ovarian cancer, while this question is still unsolved for advanced and recurrent disease. (2) Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we present a series of 21 patients who underwent MIS for primitive or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with bulky nodal metastasis and discuss surgical technique and outcomes in relation to the current literature. (3) Results: Complete cytoreduction at primary debulking surgery was obtained in 86% of cases. No complication occurred in our patients intraoperatively and only 11.1% of our patients experienced grade 2 and 3 postoperative complications. Notably, all the patients with isolated lymph nodal recurrence (ILNR) were successfully treated with a minimally invasive approach with no intra- or postoperative complications. (4) Conclusions: The results of our study are consistent with those reported in the literature, demonstrating that MIS may represent a safe approach in advanced and recurrent EOC with nodal metastasis if performed on selected patients by expert surgeons with an adequate setting and appropriate technique.

Background and Objectives: Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) often requires extensive cytoreductive surgery. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), especially diagnostic laparoscopy, is increasingly used to assess resectability and guide treatment. This review aimed to evaluate the evidence on MIS in AEOC, focusing on its diagnostic and therapeutic roles in primary and interval debulking surgery (PDS and IDS), and its impact on perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Materials and Methods: A structured literature review was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, including studies published between January 2000 and June 2025. Eligible studies involved laparoscopic or minimally invasive cytoreduction in PDS or IDS, reporting surgical feasibility, perioperative results, and oncologic outcomes. Data were synthesized qualitatively due to heterogeneity across studies. Results: Observational studies indicate that diagnostic laparoscopy predicts resectability, reduces futile laparotomies, and improves patient selection for primary surgery. In selected patients, non-randomized cohorts of laparoscopic PDS report R0 resection rates up to 95%, with low morbidity and short hospital stays. In IDS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, MIS has been associated with reduced blood loss, fewer complications, and faster postoperative recovery, while showing progression-free and overall survival comparable to laparotomy in retrospective series. Conversion to open surgery was generally reported in fewer than 10% of cases when stringent selection criteria were applied. Conclusions: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable tool for accurate preoperative evaluation and surgical planning in EOC. MIS, particularly for IDS, appears to offer reduced morbidity and equivalent survival outcomes when performed in experienced centers, whereas its application in PDS remains investigational and should be reserved for highly selected cases. These conclusions are limited by the predominance of retrospective evidence and the heterogeneity in patient selection and surgical expertise.