Amobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu

Dr. Amobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 February 2025 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMashoukur Rahaman
Mashoukur Rahaman
Jane SouthworthJane Southworth
Jane Southworth
AAAmobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu
Amobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu
BTBewuket B. Tefera
Bewuket B. Tefera
AAAli R. Alruzuq
Ali R. Alruzuq
ASAudrey Culver Smith
Audrey Culver Smith

1 December 2025 in Acta Geophysica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAAli R. Alruzuq
Ali R. Alruzuq
JMJoann Mossa
Joann Mossa
AAAmobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu
Amobichukwu Chukwudi Amanambu
YCYin-Hsuen Chen
Yin-Hsuen Chen
MBMark Brenner
Mark Brenner

4 August 2025 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HKHazhir Karimi
Hazhir Karimi
CSChristina Staudhammer
Christina Staudhammer
Matthew TherrellMatthew Therrell
Matthew Therrell
William KleindlWilliam Kleindl
William Kleindl
Leah MungaiLeah Mungai
Leah Mungai
CJC. Nathan Jones
C. Nathan Jones
The spatial variation of forest ecosystem services at regional scales remains poorly understood, and few studies have explicitly analyzed how ecosystem services are distributed across different forest management types. This study assessed the spatial overlap between forest management types and ecosystem service hotspots in the Southeastern United States (SEUS) and the Pacific Northwest (PNW) forests. We used the InVEST suite of tools and GIS to quantify carbon storage and water yield. Carbon storage was estimated, stratified by forest group and age class, and literature-based biomass pool values were applied. Average annual water yield and its temporal changes (2001–2020) were modeled using the annual water yield model, incorporating precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, vegetation type, and soil characteristics. Ecosystem service outputs were classified to identify hotspot zones (top 20%) and to evaluate the synergies and tradeoffs between these services. Hotspots were then overlaid with forest management maps to examine their distribution across management types. We found that only 2% of the SEUS and 11% of the PNW region were simultaneous hotspots for both services. In the SEUS, ecological and preservation forest management types showed higher efficiency in hotspot allocation, while in PNW, production forestry contributed relatively more to hotspot areas. These findings offer valuable insights for decision-makers and forest managers seeking to preserve the multiple benefits that forests provide at regional scales.