Douglas Bennion

Dr. Douglas Bennion

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2013 in Clinical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRobert William Regenhardt
Robert William Regenhardt
DBDouglas Bennion
Douglas Bennion
CSColin Sumners
Colin Sumners
The goal of the present review is to examine the evidence for beneficial actions of manipulation of the RAS (renin–angiotensin system) in stroke, with particular focus on Ang-(1–7) [angiotensin-(1–7)] and its receptor Mas. The RAS appears to be highly involved in the multifactorial pathophysiology of stroke. Blocking the effects of AngII (angiotensin II) at AT1R (AngII type 1 receptor), through the use of commonly prescribed ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors or AT1R blockers, has been shown to have therapeutic effects in both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke. In contrast with the deleterious actions of over activation of AT1R by AngII, stimulation of AT2Rs (AngII type 2 receptors) in the brain has been demonstrated to elicit beneficial effects in stroke. Likewise, the ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas axis of the RAS has been shown to have therapeutic effects in stroke when activated, countering the effects of the ACE/AngII/AT1R axis. Studies have demonstrated that activating this axis in the brain elicits beneficial cerebral effects in rat models of ischaemic stroke, and we have also demonstrated the cerebroprotective potential of this axis in haemorrhagic stroke using stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats and collagenase-induced striatal haemorrhage. The mechanism of cerebroprotection elicited by ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas activation includes anti-inflammatory effects within the brain parenchyma. The major hurdle to overcome in translating these results to humans is devising strategies to activate the ACE2/Ang-(1–7)/Mas cerebroprotective axis using post-stroke treatments that can be administered non-invasively.

1 September 2011 in Neuropharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBDouglas Bennion
Douglas Bennion
TJTyron Jensen
Tyron Jensen
CWCurtis Walther
Curtis Walther
JHJohn Hamblin
John Hamblin
AWAndrew Wallmann
Andrew Wallmann
JEJeffrey G. Edwards
Jeffrey G. Edwards

31 May 2018 in Experimental Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DBDouglas Bennion
Douglas Bennion
CJChad H. Jones
Chad H. Jones
LDLauren L. Donnangelo
Lauren L. Donnangelo
JGJustin T. Graham
Justin T. Graham
JIJacob D. Isenberg
Jacob D. Isenberg
CSColin Sumners
Colin Sumners

15 October 2020 in Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WGWade Gutierrez
Wade Gutierrez
DBDouglas Bennion
Douglas Bennion
JWJarrett E. Walsh
Jarrett E. Walsh
SOScott R. Owen
Scott R. Owen
Objective: Techniques for reconstruction of skull base defects have advanced greatly since the introduction of the vascular pedicled nasoseptal flap in 2006. The objective of this review is to assess the current state of the field by examining both intranasal and extranasal techniques of vascular pedicled skull base defect repair, their indications and success rates, and novel techniques that are currently under investigation.Methods: A review of the literature describing the use of vascular pedicled flaps in skull base defect reconstruction was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar.Results: The nasoseptal flap remains the most widely used vascular pedicled flap for endoscopic repair of skull base defects. Its ease of harvest, wide arch of rotation, and high success rates make it a popular choice among surgeons. Several variations including a “rescue” nasopseptal flap have been developed. Other less commonly used pedicled intranasal flaps include the middle turbinate flap and the posterior pedicled inferior turbinate flap. Additionally, several novel vascular pedicled flaps have been developed and tested in small cohorts of patients. Extranasal flaps such as the pericranial flap and the temporoparietal fascia flap are used less frequently than intranasal flaps. However, they remain valuable options for reconstruction in certain situations.Conclusion: Advancements continue to be made in the field of skull base defect reconstruction using vascular pedicled flaps. Though the nasoseptal flap remains the most widely utilized option, additional intranasal techniques continue to be developed and tested to optimize surgical outcomes and patient care.Level of Evidence: NA

3 July 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDouglas Bennion
Douglas Bennion
JIJacob D Isenberg
Jacob D Isenberg
AHAllison T Harmel
Allison T Harmel
KDKelly DeMars
Kelly DeMars
ADAlex N Dang
Alex N Dang
CSColin Sumners
Colin Sumners
Activation of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) by administration of Compound 21 (C21), a selective AT2R agonist, induces neuroprotection in models of ischemic stroke in young adult animals. The mechanisms of this neuroprotective action are varied, and may include direct and indirect effects of AT2R activation. Our objectives were to assess the long-term protective effects of post-stroke C21 treatments in a clinically-relevant model of stroke in aged rats and to characterize the cellular localization of AT2Rs in the mouse brain of transgenic reporter mice following stroke. Intraperitoneal injections of C21 (0.03mg/kg) after ischemic stroke induced by transient monofilament middle cerebral artery occlusion resulted in protective effects that were sustained for up to at least 3-weeks post-stroke. These included improved neurological function across multiple assessments and a significant reduction in infarct volume as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. We also found AT2R expression to be on neurons, not astrocytes or microglia, in normal female and male mouse brains. Stroke did not induce altered cellular localization of AT2R when assessed at 7 and 14 days post-stroke. These findings demonstrate that the neuroprotection previously characterized only during earlier time points using stroke models in young animals is sustained long-term in aged rats, implying even greater clinical relevance for the study of AT2R agonists for the acute treatment of ischemic stroke in human disease. Further, it appears that this sustained neuroprotection is likely due to a mix of both direct and indirect effects stemming from selective activation of AT2Rs on neurons or other cells besides astrocytes and microglia.

23 June 2026 in Audiology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDouglas Bennion
Douglas Bennion
AWAlicia Ann Williams
Alicia Ann Williams
CPClaire Elizabeth Perrin
Claire Elizabeth Perrin
JLJoshua Lee
Joshua Lee
PEPeter Eckard
Peter Eckard
MSMarc S. Schwartz
Marc S. Schwartz
Background/Objectives: For patients with profound deafness resulting from auditory nerve pathology, as in Neurofibromatosis type 2, auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) can restore meaningful acoustic input. The literature reporting real-world results for ABI users is limited, especially regarding patients with bilateral implants. Here, we provide an updated report on the audiologic outcomes among all ABI patients treated at a tertiary institution, including high-performing bilateral ABI users. Methods: In this updated and expanded retrospective case series, audiologic outcomes were reviewed in sixteen consecutive patients who underwent ABI placement by a single neurosurgeon-neurotologist team at our center since 2018. Implantation in four of these patients was on their second side after having undergone first side implantation prior to receiving care at our hospital. Main outcome measures were sound awareness (sound-field threshold testing) and speech understanding (pattern perception, spondee, open-set speech testing). Results: Sound awareness was achieved in 100% of patients (16/16) using an average of 12 electrodes (range 7–20). Persistent non-auditory sensations were reported by 12.5% (2/16). Postoperative speech differentiation (with or without lip-reading) was experienced in 87.5% (14/16). Two second-sided ABI recipients experienced exceptional outcomes as high-performing outliers: one achieved 57% audio only and 86% audio + visual hearing in noise test (HINT) sentence scores; the second bilateral user scored 92% with auditory-only input. Conclusions: ABI represents a viable option for patients who are at risk of developing bilateral profound deafness resulting from auditory nerve disruption. Second sided device implantation is safe and has the potential to significantly improve auditory outcomes.