Background: ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence model, may be used by future applicants in the plastic surgery residency match. Methods: Ten personal statements (5 generated by ChatGPT, 5 written by applicants) were rated by 10 reviewers, blinded to the source of the essay. Results: A total of a 100 evaluations were collected. There was no significant difference in ratings for readability, originality, authenticity, and overall quality (all P > 0.05) when comparing computer-generated and applicant essays. Conclusion: Personal statements prepared by ChatGPT are indistinguishable from essays written by actual applicants. This finding suggests that the current plastic surgery application format be reevaluated to better aid in holistic evaluation of students.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel holographic craniofacial surgical planning application and its implementation throughout the planning and operative stages of facial transplantation by performing a critical analysis of comparative utility, cost, and limitations of MR and 3D printing. Summary of Background Data: Face transplantation is a highly complex form of craniofacial reconstruction requiring significant planning, knowledge of patient-specific spatial relationships, and time-sensitive decision making. Computer-aided 3D modeling has improved efficiency and outcomes of complex craniofacial reconstruction by enabling virtual surgical planning and 3D printed model generation. MR technology can enhance surgical planning, improve visualization, and allow manipulation of virtual craniofacial biomodels within the operative field. Methods: Accounting for the time-sensitive nature of face transplantation, a unique, highly coordinated workflow for image acquisition and processing was designed to facilitate rapid holographic rendering and 3D printing. During recent face transplantation, both holographic and 3D printed models were utilized, and the time and cost of fabrication were compared. Results: Holographic models required less time and cost for fabrication. They provided both comprehensive visualization of 3D spatial relationships and novel means to perform VSP and virtual face transplantation by interacting with and manipulating patient-specific, anatomic holograms. Conclusion: Time efficiency, low-cost biomodel production, provision of unlimited preoperative surgical rehearsal, and potential for intraoperative surgical guidance makes holographic VSP and MR highly promising technology for use in complex craniofacial surgery.

Background: Breast aesthetics impacts patients’ quality of life after breast reconstruction, but patients and surgeons frequently disagree on the final aesthetic evaluation. The need for a comprehensive, validated tool to evaluate breast aesthetics independently from the patient motivated this study. Methods: The 13-item Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale was developed after several internal meetings, and worded to be understood by a nonspecialist. Three items are common for both breasts, with the remaining being side-specific. To test the internal consistency of the scale subitems, postoperative photographs after different breast reconstruction techniques were graded by a six-member panel. To test interrater and intrarater correlation across time, four physicians evaluated the results of abdominally based breast reconstructions following nipple-sparing mastectomies. Results: Graded aesthetic outcomes of 53 patients showed that the Cronbach alpha of the subitems of the scale was 0.926, with no single item that, if excluded, would increase it. Twenty-two patients underwent aesthetic outcomes grading at four different time points. The mean overall appearance was 3.71 ± 0.62. The mean grade for overall nipple appearance was 4.0 ± 0.57. The coefficient alpha of the panel overall aesthetic grade across different time points was 0.957; whereas intragrader reliability for graders 1 through 4 individually showed alpha coefficients of 0.894, 0.9, 0.898, and 0.688, respectively. Similar results were found for the other items of the scale. Conclusions: The proposed aesthetic scale evaluates different aspects of the breast reconstruction aesthetic result with excellent internal consistency among its subitems. Grading by a gender-balanced, diverse four-member panel using postoperative photographs showed higher reliability and reproducibility compared to single graders.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the wound complication rate and oncologic outcome in patients undergoing immediate versus staged soft tissue reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a single sarcoma referral center between 2006 and 2016 which identified a cohort that underwent resection of an extremity or trunk STS with reconstruction surgery (split thickness skin graft or flap coverage). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the reconstruction timing: immediate (same day) versus staged (later date). Demographic characteristics, wound complications, and oncologic outcomes were compared. Results: Of the 491 patients who underwent resection of an extremity or trunk STS, 81 (16%) received reconstructive surgery, with 26 patients undergoing immediate reconstruction and 55 patients undergoing staged reconstruction. Overall wound complication (58% vs 45%, P = 0.347) and infection rates (35% vs 25%, P = 0.602) were similar between immediate and staged groups, respectively. Likewise, local recurrence (8% vs 7%, P = 1.000), metastasis (19% vs 20%, P = 0.755), and all-cause mortality (27% vs 27%, P = 1.000) rates after reconstruction was similar. Patients in the staged group with positive margins after resection were re-excised before definitive reconstruction, whereas those in the immediate group were not. The staged group required fewer surgical intensive care unit stays after resection surgery (22% vs 58%, P = 0.006). The mean ± SD final follow-up was 38 ± 33 months. Conclusions: Wound complication rates and oncologic outcomes remain similar, regardless of timing for reconstruction. Staged reconstructions were associated with fewer surgical intensive care unit stays, while also affording opportunity for reintervention after positive margins with little additional morbidity.