Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru

Mr. Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2021 in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Gilbert KoskeyGilbert Koskey
Gilbert Koskey
SMSimon Wambui Mburu
Simon Wambui Mburu
RARichard Awino
Richard Awino
ENEzekiel Mugendi Njeru
Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru
JMJohn M. Maingi
John M. Maingi
Smallholder agroecosystems play a key role in the world's food security providing more than 50% of the food produced globally. These unique agroecosystems face a myriad of challenges and remain largely unsupported, yet they are thought to be a critical resource for feeding the projected increasing human population in the coming years. The new challenge to increase food production through agricultural intensification in shrinking per capita arable lands, dwindling world economies, and unpredictable climate change, has led to over-dependence on agrochemical inputs that are often costly and hazardous to both human and animal health and the environment. To ensure healthy crop production approaches, the search for alternative ecofriendly strategies that best fit to the smallholder systems have been proposed. The most common and widely accepted solution that has gained a lot of interest among researchers and smallholder farmers is the use of biological agents; mainly plant growth promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) that provide essential agroecosystem services within a holistic vision of enhancing farm productivity and environmental protection. PGPMs play critical roles in agroecological cycles fundamental for soil nutrient amelioration, crop nutrient improvement, plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, biocontrol of pests and diseases, and water uptake. This review explores different research strategies involving the use of beneficial microorganisms, within the unique context of smallholder agroecosystems, to promote sustainable maintenance of plant and soil health and enhance agroecosystem resilience against unpredictable climatic perturbations.

31 March 2017 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Gilbert KoskeyGilbert Koskey
Gilbert Koskey
SMSIMON MBURU
SIMON MBURU
ENEzekiel Mugendi Njeru
Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru
JKJacinta M. Kimiti
Jacinta M. Kimiti
OOOmwoyo Ombori
Omwoyo Ombori
JMJohn M. Maingi
John M. Maingi
Climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Kenya is greatly undermined by low soil fertility, especially in agriculturally prolific areas. The use of effective native rhizobia inoculants to promote nitrogen fixation could be beneficial in climbing bean production. In this study, we carried out greenhouse and field experiments to evaluate symbiotic efficiency, compare the effect of native rhizobia and commercial inoculant on nodulation, growth and yield parameters of mid-altitude climbing bean (MAC 13 and MAC 64) varieties. The greenhouse experiment included nine native rhizobia isolates, a consortium of native isolates, commercial inoculant Biofix, a mixture of native isolates + Biofix, nitrogen treated control and a non-inoculated control. In the field experiments, the treatments included the best effective native rhizobia isolate ELM3, a consortium of native isolates, a commercial inoculant Biofix, a mixture of native isolates + Biofix, and a non-inoculated control. Remarkably, four native rhizobia isolates ELM3, ELM4, ELM5 and ELM8 showed higher symbiotic efficiencies compared to the Biofix. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in symbiotic efficiency between the two climbing bean varieties. Field results demonstrated a significant improvement in nodule dry weight and seed yields of MAC 13 and MAC 64 climbing bean varieties upon rhizobia inoculation when compared to the non-inoculated controls. Inoculation with ELM3 isolate resulted to the highest seed yield of 4,397.75 kg ha-1, indicating 89 % increase over non-inoculated control (2,334.81 kg ha-1) and 30 % increase over Biofix (3,698.79 kg ha-1). Farm site significantly influenced nodule dry weight and seed yields. This study, therefore, revealed the potential of native rhizobia isolates to enhance delivery of agroecosystem services including nitrogen fixation and bean production. Further characterization and mapping of the native isolates will be imperative in development of effective and affordable commercial inoculants.

29 November 2013 in Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ENEzekiel Mugendi Njeru
Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru
LALuciano Avio
Luciano Avio
Cristiana SbranaCristiana Sbrana
Cristiana Sbrana
ATAlessandra Turrini
Alessandra Turrini
GBGionata Bocci
Gionata Bocci
MGMANUELA GIOVANNETTI
MANUELA GIOVANNETTI

18 September 2014 in Biology and Fertility of Soils
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ENEzekiel Mugendi Njeru
Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru
LALuciano Avio
Luciano Avio
GBGionata Bocci
Gionata Bocci
Cristiana SbranaCristiana Sbrana
Cristiana Sbrana
ATAlessandra Turrini
Alessandra Turrini
Fritz OehlFritz Oehl
Fritz Oehl

8 February 2021 in Malaria Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DODiana Omoke
Diana Omoke
MKMathew Kipsum
Mathew Kipsum
SOSamson Otieno
Samson Otieno
EEEdward Esalimba
Edward Esalimba
MSMili Sheth
Mili Sheth
NDNsa Dada
Nsa Dada
Background: Insecticide resistance poses a growing challenge to malaria vector control in Kenya and around the world. Following evidence of associations between the mosquito microbiota and insecticide resistance, the microbiota of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) from Tulukuyi village, Bungoma, Kenya, with differing permethrin resistance profiles were comparatively characterized. Methods: Using the CDC bottle bioassay, 133 2–3 day-old, virgin, non-blood fed female F1 progeny of field-caught An. gambiae s.s. were exposed to five times (107.5 µg/ml) the discriminating dose of permethrin. Post bioassay, 50 resistant and 50 susceptible mosquitoes were subsequently screened for kdr East and West mutations, and individually processed for microbial analysis using high throughput sequencing targeting the universal bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene. Results: 47 % of the samples tested (n = 133) were resistant, and of the 100 selected for further processing, 99 % were positive for kdr East and 1 % for kdr West. Overall, 84 bacterial taxa were detected across all mosquito samples, with 36 of these shared between resistant and susceptible mosquitoes. A total of 20 bacterial taxa were unique to the resistant mosquitoes and 28 were unique to the susceptible mosquitoes. There were significant differences in bacterial composition between resistant and susceptible individuals (PERMANOVA, pseudo-F = 2.33, P = 0.001), with presence of Sphingobacterium, Lysinibacillus and Streptococcus (all known pyrethroid-degrading taxa), and the radiotolerant Rubrobacter, being significantly associated with resistant mosquitoes. On the other hand, the presence of Myxococcus, was significantly associated with susceptible mosquitoes. Conclusions: This is the first report of distinct microbiota in An. gambiae s.s. associated with intense pyrethroid resistance. The findings highlight differentially abundant bacterial taxa between resistant and susceptible mosquitoes, and further suggest a microbe-mediated mechanism of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. These results also indicate fixation of the kdr East mutation in this mosquito population, precluding further analysis of its associations with the mosquito microbiota, but presenting the hypothesis that any microbe-mediated mechanism of insecticide resistance would be likely of a metabolic nature. Overall, this study lays initial groundwork for understanding microbe-mediated mechanisms of insecticide resistance in African mosquito vectors of malaria, and potentially identifying novel microbial markers of insecticide resistance that could supplement existing vector surveillance tools.

16 March 2016 in Biology and Fertility of Soils
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ATAlessandra Turrini
Alessandra Turrini
Cristiana SbranaCristiana Sbrana
Cristiana Sbrana
LALuciano Avio
Luciano Avio
ENEzekiel Mugendi Njeru
Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru
GBGionata Bocci
Gionata Bocci
MGManuela Giovannetti
Manuela Giovannetti