The epidemiological burden of liver steatosis associated with metabolic diseases is continuously growing worldwide and in all age classes. This condition generates possible progression of liver damage (i.e., inflammation, fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma) but also independently increases the risk of cardio-metabolic diseases and cancer. In recent years, the terminological evolution from “nonalcoholic fatty liver disease” (NAFLD) to “metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease” (MAFLD) and, finally, “metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease” (MASLD) has been paralleled by increased knowledge of mechanisms linking local (i.e., hepatic) and systemic pathogenic pathways. As a consequence, the need for an appropriate classification of individual phenotypes has been oriented to the investigation of innovative therapeutic tools. Besides the well-known role for lifestyle change, a number of pharmacological approaches have been explored, ranging from antidiabetic drugs to agonists acting on the gut–liver axis and at a systemic level (mainly farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists, PPAR agonists, thyroid hormone receptor agonists), anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory agents. The intrinsically complex pathophysiological history of MASLD makes the selection of a single effective treatment a major challenge, so far. In this evolving scenario, the cooperation between different stakeholders (including subjects at risk, health professionals, and pharmaceutical industries) could significantly improve the management of disease and the implementation of primary and secondary prevention measures. The high healthcare burden associated with MASLD makes the search for new, effective, and safe drugs a major pressing need, together with an accurate characterization of individual phenotypes. Recent and promising advances indicate that we may soon enter the era of precise and personalized therapy for MASLD/MASH.

The integrity of esophageal epithelial cells in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or GERD-like symptoms is the first mechanism of protection to decrease the sensitivity to gastric reflux and heartburn symptoms. We investigated the protective effects of Poliprotect^® (PPRO), a CE-marked medical device, on esophageal epithelial integrity using in vitro and ex vivo models. In vitro, the protective effects of PPRO were tested on Caco-2 cells. PPRO demonstrated safety and protection against oxidative damage induced by hydrogen peroxide. It also preserved epithelial integrity by maintaining transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) against damage from calcium removal or bile acid exposure (taurodeoxycholic acid, TDCA). Ex vivo, esophageal biopsies from patients subjected to endoscopy were mounted in Ussing chambers and exposed to damaging agents (HCl or HCl + TDCA). Untreated biopsies (control) showed significant loss of epithelial resistance (up to −33%). In contrast, low concentrations of PPRO (50–100 µg/mL) provided strong protection against these damages (p < 0.001), even after 60 min of washing. Histological analysis confirmed the barrier-enhancing effect of PPRO. Overall, PPRO effectively protected the esophageal epithelium from damage in both models, suggesting its potential role in alleviating GERD or GERD-like symptoms by strengthening mucosal barriers and reducing epithelial sensitivity to reflux.

Background/Objectives: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a widely prevalent chronic disorder of brain–gut interaction which represents a clinical challenge due to its complex underlying causes and the lack of a standardized treatment approach. This cross-sectional research collected real-world data (RWD) on the effectiveness, safety, and usage pattern of a natural substance-based medical device, Colilen IBS, indicated for the treatment of IBS. Methods: Surveys were conducted both in Italy and Germany with 6101 participants, including 4425 patients, 1014 pharmacists, and 662 physicians using a structured GxP web platform that allows voluntary participants to share their experiences with the device. The validated platform was designed to comply with post-market surveillance requirements of EU Regulation 2017/745. Statistical analyses included descriptive evaluations of responses to gauge overall effectiveness and safety of the device. Results: The effectiveness reported with the medical device was judged extreme or great by 79.2% of patients, with 89.2% of whom observed symptom improvement within one month. Both safety and tolerability were rated extreme or great by 90.7% of patients. Healthcare professionals reported a similar rate on the overall effectiveness, with 94.9% of pharmacists and 95.9% of physicians indicating it extreme or great. Similarly, the safety profile was corroborated by nearly all pharmacists (97.0%) and physicians (98.2%) reporting extreme or great satisfaction with both safety and tolerability of the medical device. Conclusions: This research provides RWD supporting the effectiveness and safety of the product for treating IBS. The strong coherence among patients, pharmacists, and physicians in positively rating the device’s performance suggests that this medical device represents a therapeutic option that effectively addresses patient needs while minimizing safety concerns. Continuous RWD collection is essential, as it offers insights into real-world practice and ensures ongoing confirmation of the product’s safety and effectiveness. Ultimately, this will advance IBS patient care by integrating real-world evidence into clinical management.