Feng Zhou

Dr. Feng Zhou

School of Mechanical Engineering and Electronic Information, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2018 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Feng ZhouFeng Zhou
Feng Zhou
ZCZhongchang Chen
Zhongchang Chen
HLHai Liu
Hai Liu
JCJie Cui
Jie Cui
BSBillie Floyd Spencer
Billie Floyd Spencer
GFGuangyou Fang
Guangyou Fang
Precise characterization of reinforcing bars (rebars) in a concrete structure is of significant importance for construction quality control and post-disaster safety evaluation. This paper integrates ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) methods for simultaneous estimation of rebar diameter and cover thickness. A prototype of GPR-EMI dual sensor is developed, and a calibration experiment is conducted to collect a standard EMI dataset corresponding to various rebar diameters and cover thicknesses. The handheld testing cart can synchronously collect both GPR and EMI data when moving on the concrete surface, from which a data processing algorithm is proposed to simultaneously estimate the rebar diameter and cover thickness. Firstly, by extracting the apex of the hyperbolic reflection from the rebar in the preprocessed GPR profile, the rebar position is determined and further used to extract the effective EMI curve. Then, the rebar diameter and cover thickness are simultaneously estimated from the minimum mean square error between the measured and calibrated EMI data under the constraint of the GPR-estimated cover thickness. A laboratory experiment is performed using four casted concrete specimens with 11 embedded steel rebars. The results show that the diameters of 10 rebars are correctly estimated out of the 11 rebars, and the maximum estimation error for the cover thickness is 6.7%. A field trial is carried out in a newly-constructed building, and the diameters of four tested rebars are all accurately estimated while the estimation errors of the cover thickness are less than 5%. It is concluded that the developed GPR-EMI dual sensor and the proposed algorithm can estimate the rebar diameter and cover thickness accurately by a single scan.

26 November 2021 in Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXiaofeng Li
Xiaofeng Li
HLHai Liu
Hai Liu
Feng ZhouFeng Zhou
Feng Zhou
ZCZhongchang Chen
Zhongchang Chen
IGIraklis Giannakis
Iraklis Giannakis
ESEvert Slob
Evert Slob
This paper proposes a nondestructive evaluation method based on deep learning using combined ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EMI) data for autonomic and accurate estimation of the cover thickness and diameter of reinforcement bars. A real-time object detection algorithm—You Only Look Once–version 3 (YOLO v3)—is adopted to automatically identify the reinforcement bar reflected signals from radargrams, with which the range of the cover thickness is roughly predicted. Subsequently, EMI data, accompanied with the cover thickness range, are imported to a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN), pretrained by calibrated EMI and GPR data, to simultaneously estimate the cover thickness and reinforcement bar diameter. Testing with the on-site GPR data shows that YOLO v3 is superior to Single Shot Multibox Detector method in GPR hyperbolic signal identification. Testing of 1D CNN with the EMI and GPR data collected in an in-house sand pit experiment shows that the estimation accuracy of the cover thickness and reinforcement bar diameter is, respectively, 96.8% and 90.3% with a permissible error of 1 mm. Further, an experiment with concrete specimens demonstrates that among the 22 estimated values (including the reinforcement bar diameter and cover thickness), there are 17 values accurately estimated, while the inaccurately estimated values have an error up to 2 mm. The experimental results show that the proposed method can autonomically evaluate the reinforcement bar diameter and cover thickness with a high accuracy.

1 August 2021 in Petroleum Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
QFQing-Fu Feng
Qing-Fu Feng
YXYu-Xiang Xiao
Yu-Xiang Xiao
XHXiu-Lin Hou
Xiu-Lin Hou
HCHong-Kui Chen
Hong-Kui Chen
ZWZe-Cheng Wang
Ze-Cheng Wang
HJHua Jiang
Hua Jiang

1 March 2018 in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Feng ZhouFeng Zhou
Feng Zhou
MMMattia Miorali
Mattia Miorali
ESEvert Slob
Evert Slob
XHXiangyun Hu
Xiangyun Hu
The recently developed smart well technology allows for sectionalized production control by means of downhole inflow control valves and monitoring devices. We consider borehole radars as permanently installed downhole sensors to monitor fluid evolution in reservoirs, and it provides the possibility to support a proactive control for smart well production. To investigate the potential of borehole radar on monitoring reservoirs, we establish a 3D numerical model by coupling electromagnetic propagation and multiphase flow modeling in a bottom-water drive reservoir environment. Simulation results indicate that time-lapse downhole radar measurements can capture the evolution of water and oil distributions in the proximity (order of meters) of a production well, and reservoir imaging with an array of downhole radars successfully reconstructs the profile of a flowing water front. With the information of reservoir dynamics, a proactive control procedure with smart well production is conducted. This method observably delays the water breakthrough and extends the water-free recovery period. To assess the potential benefits that borehole radar brings to hydrocarbon recovery, three production strategies are simulated in a thin oil rim reservoir scenario, i.e., a conventional well production, a reactive production, and a combined production supported by borehole radar monitoring. Relative to the reactive strategy, the combined strategy further reduces cumulative water production by 66.89%, 1.75%, and 0.45% whereas it increases cumulative oil production by 4.76%, 0.57%, and 0.31%, in the production periods of 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years, respectively. The quantitative comparisons reflect that the combined production strategy has the capability of accelerating oil production and suppressing water production, especially in the early stage of production. We suggest that borehole radar is a promising reservoir monitoring technology, and it has the potential to improve oil recovery efficiency.

5 June 2020 in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Feng ZhouFeng Zhou
Feng Zhou
IGIraklis Giannakis
Iraklis Giannakis
AGAntonios Giannopoulos
Antonios Giannopoulos
KHKlaus Holliger
Klaus Holliger
ESEvert Slob
Evert Slob
In oil drilling, mud filtrate penetrates into porous formations and alters the compositions and properties of the pore fluids. This disturbs the logging signals and brings errors to reservoir evaluation. Drilling and logging engineers therefore deem mud invasion as undesired and attempt to eliminate its adverse effects. However, the mud-contaminated formation carries valuable information, notably with regard to its hydraulic properties. Typically, the invasion depth critically depends on the formation porosity and permeability. Therefore, if adequately characterized, mud invasion effects could be used for reservoir evaluation. To pursue this objective, we have applied borehole radar to measure mud invasion depth considering its high radial spatial resolution compared with conventional logging tools, which then allows us to estimate the reservoir permeability based on the acquired invasion depth. We investigate the feasibility of this strategy numerically through coupled electromagnetic and fluid modeling in an oil-bearing layer drilled using freshwater-based mud. Time-lapse logging is simulated to extract the signals reflected from the invasion front, and a dual-offset downhole antenna mode enables time-to-depth conversion to determine the invasion depth. Based on drilling, coring, and logging data, a quantitative interpretation chart is established, mapping the porosity, permeability, and initial water saturation into the invasion depth. The estimated permeability is in a good agreement with the actual formation permeability. Our results therefore suggest that borehole radar has significant potential to estimate permeability through mud invasion effects.