Background: The pan-immune–inflammation (PIV) score is a hematological index derived from neutrophil, platelet, monocyte and lymphocyte counts. It has been demonstrated that it has high prognostic value in oncological patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between PIV and 28-day mortality in elderly (≥65 years) critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of sepsis. Methods: This single-centre retrospective study included 96 patients aged ≥65 years who were admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of sepsis according to the Sepsis-3 criteria between 15 July 2024 and 15 July 2025. Patients were divided into low- and high-PIV groups based on the median PIV. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were performed. Results: The overall 28-day mortality rate was found to be 55.2% (n = 53). The median PIV was 866.58 (IQR: 497.34–1978.43). The PIV was shown not to be a significant predictor of 28-day mortality (AUC: 0.550; p = 0.400). No difference in survival was observed between the low- and high-PIV groups in the Kaplan–Meier analysis (log-rank p = 0.662). In multivariate Cox regression, high creatinine (HR: 2.683; p < 0.001), high calcium (HR: 2.312; p = 0.004), a low partial thromboplastin time (HR: 0.396; p = 0.005) and a requirement for vasopressors (HR: 2.225; p = 0.025) were identified as independent predictors of mortality. In the Kaplan–Meier analysis for 28-day survival, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.023) and chronic renal disease (p = 0.034) were found to be significantly associated with poorer survival. Conclusions: The PIV is unable to predict 28-day mortality in elderly critically ill patients diagnosed with sepsis. This finding suggests that immunosenescence and inflammaging reduce the predictive power of composite hematological indices. Markers of organ dysfunction, coagulopathy and hemodynamic instability remain more reliable prognostic indicators in geriatric patients with sepsis.

Background and Objectives: Thoracic trauma usually results in high morbidity and mortality. It is the leading cause of death in patients within the first four decades of life. In this study, we aimed to identify risk factors for intensive care mortality and to evaluate factors affecting clinical outcomes and complications in patients with thoracic trauma who were treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study. Patients diagnosed with thoracic trauma and followed up in the ICU between 1 May 2023 and 1 January 2025 were included. Critically ill patients aged 18 years and older whose admission blood values were available and who had undergone radiological imaging were included in the study. Patients were grouped as Survivors or Non-survivors. The primary outcome was to determine risk factors for mortality. The secondary outcome was to evaluate factors affecting clinical outcomes and complications. The tertiary outcome was to determine the predictive value of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) for mortality. Results: A total of 104 patients (male/female ratio: 76/28) were included in the study. Twenty-four patients (23.1%) died, and eighty (76.9%) were discharged. Age in the Non-survivor group was found to be significantly higher (59.33 ± 22.21 vs. 40.50 ± 17.71; p < 0.001), and the proportion of women was also significantly higher in the Non-survivor group (p = 0.0082). Mortality was associated with advanced age, female sex, lower GCS score (p < 0.001), higher APACHE II scores (p < 0.001), and the presence of comorbid conditions (p = 0.003), including head trauma (p = 0.024) and cardiac arrest before ICU admission (p = 0.011). The Non-survivor group more frequently required mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001), vasopressor support (p < 0.001), and continuous renal replacement therapy (p < 0.001), and they developed ventilator-associated pneumonia (p < 0.001) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (p < 0.001) at higher rates. ICU length of stay was also significantly longer in the Non-survivor group (p = 0.045). The APACHE II score demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance, emerging as the strongest clinical predictor of mortality (AUC = 0.751, 95% CI: 0.630–0.872; p < 0.001). Age (OR: 1.06) and serum lactate levels (OR: 1.57) consistently emerged as strong independent predictors of mortality. The presence of head trauma significantly increased the risk of mortality, particularly in the APACHE II-adjusted model (OR: 9.08). The APACHE II–based model yielded high specificity (96.3%) and accuracy (88.5%), with good discrimination (AUC = 0.894) and the highest Nagelkerke R² (0.548). Conclusions: Factors that may shorten the length of ICU stay include infection control, early correction of acidosis, and maintenance of hemodynamic stability, which may reduce mortality. APACHE II was more closely related to overall clinical severity than the other scoring systems. Our data indicate that age-related frailty and acute physiological derangement, as best represented by the APACHE II score, are more significant determinants of survival than anatomic injury severity alone.

Achromobacter xylosoxidans is an emerging opportunistic pathogen increasingly encountered in intensive care units (ICUs). Data on clinical characteristics

Association between Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, C-reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio, Red Cell Distribution Width, and APACHE II Score in Predicting Prognosis and Mortality in Sepsis - Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine

BRASH syndrome is a definition that encompasses complex causes of bradycardia. The use of atrioventricular node blockers, renal failure, hypercalcemia, bradycardia, renal hypoperfusion create a cascade that triggers each other. Additionally, hyperkalemic drugs such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may aggrevate the clinical condition. This is a clinical condition that can lead to shock and mortality if the diagnosis and mechanism are not considered or overlooked. We presented the BRASH clinic in 84-year-old female patient and discussed the approach. Finally, we created a graphical abstract summarizing this syndrome.

Background/Aims: This study aims to compare the reliability of the FOUR (Full Outline of Unresponsiveness) score and GCS (Glasgow Coma Score) when used by specialists from different medical disciplines. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine between December 2023 and June 2024. Eighty-two patients in the Anesthesiology and Reanimation Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were assessed by three specialists—a pulmonologist, a neurologist, and an anesthesiologist—within 24 hours of ICU admission. The variation between evaluators of both scoring systems was analyzed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). If the ICC coefficient was below 0.50, the agreement was interpreted as poor. Results: The study included 82 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the FOUR and GCS scores assigned by the three specialists. The mortality rate among patients with low scores on both FOUR and GCS was higher than the hospital mortality rate. Conclusions: Scales used in the ICU should be simple, reliable and predictive. This study demonstrated that the FOUR score is at minimum equivalent to the GCS in meeting these criteria.