Background: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are used in the management of type II diabetes mellitus or obesity, although its role in patients with type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been debated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM using real-world data. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at three tertiary medical centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study followed up patients (>16 years old) with T1DM treated with insulin followed by GLP-1RA add-on therapy. The efficacy outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin requirements from baseline to each follow-up visit. The main safety outcomes assessed included hypoglycemic events and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Results: The study included 144 patients with a mean age of 33.0 ± 10.1 years. Semaglutide was the most used GLP-1RA (63.9%) followed by liraglutide (34.0%). From baseline to 3-month follow-up, HbA1c (mean difference (MD) = −0.8%; p = 0.0053), weight (MD = −2.4 kg; p = 0.0253), and daily basal insulin dose (MD = −2.1 units; p = 0.0349) were significantly reduced. Likewise, HbA1c (MD = −0.5%; p = 0.0004), weight (MD = −3.6 kg; p < 0.0001), and daily basal insulin (MD = −2.4 units; p = 0.0282) were significantly reduced at the 4–6-month follow-up. The significant reductions in HbA1c, weight, and daily basal insulin levels were consistent for up to 18-month follow-up. Only one patient had a major hypoglycemic event, whereas 8.3% of the patients had GI adverse events. Conclusions: Overall, significant improvements in glycemic control, weight loss, and insulin requirements were observed with the use of GLP-1RA in patients with T1DM, with a limited number of GI adverse events.

Background: Nutritional deficiency anemias—including iron, vitamin B12, and folate deficiencies—are common worldwide and are increasingly recognized as potential contributors to venous thromboembolism (VTE). Mechanistic and epidemiologic data suggest that anemia may promote thrombosis through hypoxia, endothelial activation, reactive thrombocytosis, and hyperhomocysteinemia. However, a focused synthesis of clinical and genetic evidence specifically linking nutritional deficiency anemia to VTE has been lacking. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library from inception to 30 September 2025 to identify studies assessing nutritional deficiency anemia in relation to VTE outcomes. Eligible studies included observational designs, case reports, case series, and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Quality assessment followed the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists, and ROB-MR. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251235479). Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Observational analytical studies consistently showed that anemia was associated with adverse VTE-related outcomes. Lower hemoglobin predicted higher short-term mortality in acute pulmonary embolism (HR 1.16 per 1 g/dL decrease), increased symptomatic VTE among hospitalized patients (RR 1.94), and greater long-term bleeding and mortality risk in VTE cohorts (HRs 1.41–2.89). Iron-deficiency anemia increased the odds of VTE in population-based data (OR 1.43), and case reports described unprovoked DVT in young adults with moderate to severe anemia. The MR study indicated a potential causal association between anemia traits and thrombosis at unusual anatomical sites (OR 1.446). No study demonstrated a significant association with recurrent VTE. Most analytical studies were rated as good–high quality. Conclusion: Across multiple study designs, anemia—particularly iron-deficiency anemia and low baseline hemoglobin—appears to be an underrecognized factor associated with elevated VTE risk and adverse VTE-related outcomes. However, direct evidence for vitamin B12- and folate-deficiency anemia remains limited, and further well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm causality and clarify the contribution of specific nutritional deficiency subtypes, as well as to support integration of anemia assessment into VTE risk models.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still a serious clinical problem because many patients still have a significant chance of having it happen again after their first course of anticoagulation is over. In recent years, reduced-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been investigated as a means to ensure prolonged protection while diminishing the risk of bleeding complications. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence comparing reduced-dose and full-dose DOAC regimens during the extended phase of VTE treatment. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library (January 2010–November 2025) identified randomized trials and one ambispective cohort study evaluating reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg BID), rivaroxaban (10 mg OD), dabigatran (110 mg BID), or edoxaban (30 mg OD). Methodological quality was assessed using RoB-2 for trials and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational data. Because of differences in study designs and outcome definitions, a narrative synthesis was applied. Results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Across trials, reduced-dose DOACs maintained consistently low rates of recurrent VTE: 1.7% in AMPLIFY-EXT versus 8.8% with placebo; 1.2–1.5% in EINSTEIN CHOICE versus 4.4% with aspirin; 2.2% in RENOVE versus 1.8% with full-dose therapy; and 1.3% in HI-PRO versus 10% with placebo. Real-world data from Valeriani et al. showed only a single recurrence (0.7%) over nearly three years. Major bleeding remained uncommon, ranging from 0.1 to 0.5% in randomized trials and 2.1–2.9% in longer-term observational cohorts. Conclusions: In summary, reduced-dose DOACs appear to offer a favorable balance of safety and efficacy, providing durable protection against recurrence with a lower bleeding burden. These findings support their role as a practical extended-treatment strategy in clinical practice.

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) represents one of the most serious complications of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Conflicting studies indicate that statins could play a role in preventing recurrent VTE or improving survival in patients with PE. This review aims to assess the impact of statin use on clinical outcomes in patients with PE. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify studies evaluating the impact of statin therapy in patients with PE. The search covered all records from inception to 21 September 2025. Studies were deemed eligible if they included adult patients with PE, investigated statin and reported clinical outcomes such as mortality, recurrent PE, recurrent VTE, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The methodological quality of the included observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: A total of twelve observational studies were included; sample sizes ranged from fewer than 400 patients to nearly 200,000, with follow-up durations spanning from 30 days to more than 5 years. Statin use was associated with reduced short-term and all-cause mortality in large registry analyses, though smaller studies showed no difference. Most cohorts reported lower VTE recurrence among statin users, with some variation across settings. Overall, evidence suggests a potential benefit of statins in reducing mortality and VTE recurrence in patients with pulmonary embolism. Conclusions: Real-world data suggest that statin therapy may reduce both short-term mortality and VTE recurrence following PE, though findings vary depending on study quality and population characteristics. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Background: Diabetics with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) manifest more adverse clinical outcomes with elevated rates of death. It has been suggested that the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pathway of entrance into the host cell might be assisted by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4), leading to inflammation and cytokine storm, with replication into the airways and unfavorable effects in the lungs. Consequently, the goal of this systematic review is to investigate the most recent data on the effect of DPP-4i (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor) medications on clinical outcomes, mainly mortality among COVID-19 patients. Methods: By conducting a systematic search using PubMed and the Cochrane library, observational studies were identified to examine the association between DPP-4i medications and clinical outcomes including mortality, intensive care unit and hospital admissions. The methodologies of included studies were assessed utilizing the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: A total of nineteen studies were included with sample sizes varying from over 100 patients to 2.8 million and variant follow-up durations from 30 days up to discharge or death. Most of the population across the studies had COVID-19 for the first time, and the majority were hospitalized. Similarly, mortality definition varied among studies with different time points consisting of 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, or all-cause mortality. The majority of the studies identified no effect on mortality by DPP-4i, while a considerable proportion revealed beneficial effects; only four studies showed increased mortality. Conclusions: Real-world data from this review suggested a safe use of DPP-4i among COVID-19 patients; however, randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the beneficial outcomes and safe use.