Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetitive episodes of upper airway obstruction caused by a loss of upper airway dilator muscle tone during sleep and an inadequate compensatory response by these muscles in the context of an anatomically compromised airway. The genioglossus (GG) is the main upper airway dilator muscle. Currently, continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line treatment for OSA. Nevertheless, problems related to poor adherence have been described in some groups of patients. In recent years, new OSA treatment strategies have been developed to improve GG function. (A) Hypoglossal nerve electrical stimulation leads to significant improvements in objective (apnea-hypopnea index, or AHI) and subjective measurements of OSA severity, but its invasive nature limits its application. (B) A recently introduced combination of drugs administered orally before bedtime reduces AHI and improves the responsiveness of the GG. (C) Finally, myofunctional therapy also decreases AHI, and it might be considered in combination with other treatments. Our objective is to review these therapies in order to advance current understanding of the prospects for alternative OSA treatments.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children is a prevalent, but still, today, underdiagnosed illness, which consists of repetitive episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep with important repercussions for sleep quality. OSA has relevant consequences in the pediatric population, mainly in the metabolic, cardiovascular (CV), and neurological spheres. However, contrary to adults, advances in diagnostic and therapeutic management have been scarce in the last few years despite the increasing scientific evidence of the deleterious consequences of pediatric OSA. The problem of underdiagnosis and the lack of response to treatment in some groups make an update to the management of OSA in children necessary. Probably, the heterogeneity of OSA is not well represented by the classical clinical presentation and severity parameters (apnea/hypopnea index (AHI)), and new strategies are required. A specific and consensus definition should be established. Additionally, the role of simplified methods in the diagnosis algorithm should be considered. Finally, the search for new biomarkers for risk stratification is needed in this population. In conclusion, new paradigms based on personalized medicine should be implemented in this population.

Background: The importance of understanding the presentation of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in women has been increasingly recognized. Although there is some insight that there are significant differences in presentation between women and men, the consequences of such differences, particularly for treatment have not yet been fully identified. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the phenotype of OSA in women. Materials and Methods: Study of a population-based clinical cohort of 2022 patients with OSA confirmed by polygraphy or polysomnography (apnea–hypopnea index [AHI] >5/hour). Comorbidities, symptoms, physical examination, current medical treatments, and sleep parameters were recorded. Results: A total of 709 women and 1313 men were included in this study. After adjustment for anthropometric characteristics, morphological alterations, and previous treatment, women were found to have lower AHI values (25.3 ± 1.2 vs. 35.0 ± 0.9; p < 0.001), desaturation index (24.4 ± 1.2 vs. 33.2 ± 0.9; p < 0.001), and saturation time <90% (18.8 ± 1.3 vs. 24.1 ± 1.0; p < 0.001) compared with men. Furthermore, women had a lower risk of witnessed apnea (odds ratio adjusted [ORa] for baseline characteristics and sleep parameters), (ORa: 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.71), reduced sensation of restful sleep (ORa: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38–0.66), greater fatigue (ORa: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.86–3.86), headache (ORa: 3.00, 95% CI: 2.26–3.97), memory disorders (ORa: 1.836, 95% CI: 1.40–2.41), insomnia (ORa: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.50–2.93), and excessive daytime sleepiness (ORa: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.03–1.92), with interference in their daily activities (ORa: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.17–2.03). Likewise, after adjustment for anthropometric characteristics and sleep parameters, women also showed higher risk of depression (ORa: 4.31, 95% CI: 3.15–5.89) and anxiety (ORa: 3.18, 95% CI: 2.38–4.26). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that women present a specific OSA phenotype, with a probable implication for clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic management.

Background/Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is marked by repetitive occurrences of upper airway (UA) obstruction during sleep. Morbidities impacting the metabolic, cardiovascular (CV) and neurological systems are correlated with OSA. Only a few studies have described the existence of different characteristics depending on sex and, to date, the girl phenotype in OSA pediatrics is not well known. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the specific phenotype of OSA in pediatric and adolescent females compared to males. Methods: A systematic review was performed. The terms “pediatric sleep apnea” and “sex differences” were used to look for publications using PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria: (1) peer-reviewed journal articles written in English; (2) investigations conducted on individuals diagnosed with OSA; and (3) investigations providing information about sex differences. Exclusion criteria: (1) studies carried out with individuals aged 18 years and older; (2) studies involving a sample size of fewer than 10 patients; and (3) editorials, letters and case reports. Results: Fifteen studies were included and classified in sections related to sex-based differences. Conclusions: Limited information related to sex-based OSA differences in the pediatric population exists. These differences are conditioned by hormonal status, and are minimal in the premenarcheal period. Moreover, adolescent women present a lower prevalence of obesity and craniofacial alterations, lower OSA severity related to higher UA area and earlier tonsil regression. Hyperactivity is more frequent in boys. Some studies pointed to a higher risk of high diastolic blood pressure in girls than in boys.