Jan-Jaap Mellema

Mr. Jan-Jaap Mellema

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 February 2026 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JMJan-Jaap Mellema
Jan-Jaap Mellema
CSChantal F. Stockem
Chantal F. Stockem
CHCameron Herberts
Cameron Herberts
SCSamantha K. Cheung
Samantha K. Cheung
DVDaniel J. Vis
Daniel J. Vis
MHMichiel S. van der Heijden
Michiel S. van der Heijden

24 July 2024 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMaksim A. Chelushkin
Maksim A. Chelushkin
JDJeroen van Dorp
Jeroen van Dorp
Sandra van WilpeSandra van Wilpe
Sandra van Wilpe
ISIris M. Seignette
Iris M. Seignette
JMJan-Jaap Mellema
Jan-Jaap Mellema
MHMichiel S. van der Heijden
Michiel S. van der Heijden
Purpose: Platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors are key components of systemic treatment for muscle-invasive and advanced urothelial cancer. The ideal integration of these two treatment modalities remains unclear as clinical trials have led to inconsistent results. Modulation of the tumor-immune microenvironment by chemotherapy is poorly characterized. We aimed to investigate this modulation, focusing on potential clinical implications for immune checkpoint inhibitor response. Experimental Design: We assessed immune cell densities, spatial relations, and tumor/stromal components from 116 patients with urothelial bladder cancer (paired data for 95 patients) before and after platinum-based chemotherapy. Results: Several published biomarkers for immunotherapy response changed upon chemotherapy treatment. The intratumoral CD8+ T-cell percentage increased after treatment and was associated with increased TNFα-via-NF-κB signaling. The percentage of PDL1+ immune cells was higher after chemotherapy. An increase in chemo-induced changes that potentially inhibit an antitumor immune response was also observed, including increased fibroblast-based TGFβ signaling and distances from immune cells to the nearest cancer cell. The latter two parameters correlated significantly in posttreatment samples, suggesting that TGFβ signaling in fibroblasts may play a role in spatially separating immune cells from cancer cells. We examined specific chemotherapy regimens and found that treatment with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was associated with an increase in the macrophage cell percentage. Gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy was associated with upregulation of fibroblast TGFβ signaling. Conclusions: The opposing effects of platinum-based chemotherapy on the immune cell composition and stromal context of the tumor-immune microenvironment may explain the inconsistent results of clinical trials investigating chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in bladder cancer.

22 December 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKatelijne C.C. De Bie
Katelijne C.C. De Bie
JMJan-Jaap Mellema
Jan-Jaap Mellema
DMDennie Meijer
Dennie Meijer
FTFrederik R. Teunissen
Frederik R. Teunissen
PLPim J. van Leeuwen
Pim J. van Leeuwen
AVAndré Vis
André Vis
Background/Objectives: In men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after a radical prostatectomy (RP), salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is commonly recommended when imaging shows no metastases. The optimal management for patients with negative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT findings at BCR remains uncertain. This study evaluated outcomes of patients with BCR and negative PSMA PET/CT to identify who may be safely observed and who may benefit from early SRT. Methods: This retrospective multicentre cohort study included 89 patients with BCR and negative PSMA PET/CT findings after a RP (2015–2022) who were managed with observation. The exclusion criteria were PSA levels ≥ 0.8 ng/mL at baseline, prior SRT, or prior or ongoing hormonal therapy. Minimum follow-up was 3 years. Biochemical progression (PSA rise > 0.2 ng/mL above baseline or initiation of additional treatment) and radiological progression (local or metastatic disease on follow-up PSMA PET/CT) were assessed. Patients were stratified by EAU BCR-risk classification. Multivariable Cox regression included age, biochemical persistence (BCP) after a RP, pathological tumour stage (pT), pathological ISUP grade group (pISUP), node status (pN), margin status (R), and PSA doubling time (PSAdt). Results: The median age was 66 years (IQR 60–69) and the median PSA measurement at BCR was 0.2 ng/mL (IQR 0.2–0.3). A total of 27/89 (30%) patients were EAU BCR low-risk and 62/89 (70%) were high-risk. At three years, biochemical progression occurred in 14/27 (52%) low-risk vs. 51/62 (83%) high-risk patients, with time to progression being 21 vs. 12 months (p = 0.01). A pISUP grade group ≥ 4 (HR 2.04 [95%-CI 1.11–3.74]; p = 0.022) and a PSAdt < 20 months (HR 5.72 [95%-CI 2.41–13,56]; p < 0.01) independently predicted biochemical progression. Radiological progression occurred in 43/68 (66%) rescanned patients, with 32/43 (74%) showing disease outside the prostatic fossa. Conclusions: Nearly half of patients with BCR and negative PSMA PET/CT findings who were classified as EAU BCR low-risk remained progression-free at three years. These results support a risk-adapted approach, indicating that SRT may be deferred in selected low-risk patients.

13 September 2024
Verified
Other
Open access
MCMaksim A. Chelushkin
Maksim A. Chelushkin
JDJeroen van Dorp
Jeroen van Dorp
Sandra van WilpeSandra van Wilpe
Sandra van Wilpe
ISIris M. Seignette
Iris M. Seignette
JMJan-Jaap Mellema
Jan-Jaap Mellema
MHMichiel S. van der Heijden
Michiel S. van der Heijden
Processed mIF and IHC data and RNA-seq-based signature scores


13 September 2024
Verified
Other
Open access
MCMaksim A. Chelushkin
Maksim A. Chelushkin
JDJeroen van Dorp
Jeroen van Dorp
Sandra van WilpeSandra van Wilpe
Sandra van Wilpe
ISIris M. Seignette
Iris M. Seignette
JMJan-Jaap Mellema
Jan-Jaap Mellema
MHMichiel S. van der Heijden
Michiel S. van der Heijden
Supplementary Table S1. Representativeness of Study Participants