The effect of anti-algics on tumor progression and the overall survival of patients is controversial and remains unclear. Herein, we disclose the in vitro effects of the local anesthetics lidocaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine on breast (MCF7), prostate (PC3, LNCaP), and bladder (TCCSUP, HT1376) cancer cell lines, both as monotherapy and in combination with standard-of-care therapeutics. Assays for cell proliferation, viability, death profile, and migration were performed. Additionally, we explored the clinical outcomes of opioid use through a cross-sectional study involving 200 metastatic prostate cancer patients. The main clinical data collected included the type of opioid therapy administered, dosage, treatment duration, disease progression, and overall survival. Results obtained demonstrate that treatment with local anesthetics has a promising selective anti-tumor effect on these types of cancer, with higher effects when associated with docetaxel. This points out the use of local anesthetics as an added value in the treatment of prostate carcinoma patients. Alternatively, chronic opioid use was correlated with reduced overall survival (p < 0.05) and progression-free survival (p < 0.05) at each treatment line in the observational study. While these results provide valuable insights, larger prospective studies are imperative to comprehensively evaluate the clinical impact of opioid analgesics in prostate cancer patients.

Objective: To assess the association of C reactive protein/Albumin ratio (CAR) with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Materials and methods: A transversal study was conducted, including all patients diagnosed with mCRPC within a Central Hospital Urological Oncology consultation between December 2019 and December 2021 (n = 178) and that were submitted to systemic therapy. CRP and albumin results were collected at the beginning of the systemic treatment for mCRPC in 103 patients and, in 75 patients already under treatment at the start of the study, on that occasion (December 2019). All patients were then followed. CAR was correlated with PFS and OS. OS and PFS were measured from the day the CRP and Alb were collected until the event of interest or the final date of follow-up. The sample was divided in two groups according to an optimal cutoff point found in a ROC curve. Results: The sample showed a median age of 75.76 ± 9.17 years old. Using a cut-off point of 0.22, patients with a CAR ≤ 0.22 (63.2%) showed, compared to CAR > 0.22, longer PFS (15.92 vs. 9.46 months, r = -0.13, p < 0.05) and OS (p = < 0.05, 25,72 vs. 15.79 months, r = -0,24, p < 0.05). Better OS in patients with CAR ≤ 0.22 vs > 0.22 was detected on both the group evaluated at the beginning of systemic treatment (26.96 vs 17.63 months, p < 0.05) and the group of patients already under treatment (23.90 vs 11.54 months, p < 0.05). Dividing the sample according to the first line treatment chosen, we found OS of 26.25 vs 5.9 months (p < 0.05), 27.71 vs 22.57 months (p < 0.05) and 27.36 vs 23.75 months (p = 0.12), for docetaxel, abiraterone and enzalutamide, respectively. Conclusions: According to this study, higher values of CAR are associated with lower PFS and OS in mCRPC patients. We found a cut-off value of 0.22 providing the best discrimination for prognosis. CAR is a good prognosis biomarker, irrespective of the moment of evaluation and chosen treatment option.

A 55-year-old woman with dyspnea was diagnosed with a 9.5cm left renal clear cell carcinoma and extensive metastatic disease. Initial treatment with Sunitinib was effective but discontinued due to severe dermatitis. Nivolumab therapy led to complete metastasis resolution and consequently nephrectomy was performed at 12 months. Postoperatively, she developed Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like disease, necessitating Nivolumab suspension and vision improvement with corticosteroids. After 24 disease-free months, a new contralateral renal lesion and pulmonary metastases were identified, prompting cabozantinib treatment. This resulted in clinical improvement and a partial response at the first follow-up.

Introduction: Stage I seminoma has a very good prognosis, yet approximately 15% have subclinical metastatic disease and will relapse after orchidectomy alone. Several management approaches have been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of real-world patients with stage I seminoma, analysing prognostic factors influencing treatment choice and oncological outcomes. Methods: Retrospective, single institution study, with 55 patients diagnosed with clinical stage I seminoma between 2007 and 2020. Selected patients were analysed regarding three management approaches - surveillance, adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant carboplatin AUC7. Overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes were analysed. Predictors of treatment choice were determined, and predictors of recurrence were analysed in patients on active surveillance. Results: The median follow-up time was 91 months (13-165). Overall survival at 10 years was 98.2%. Stage I seminoma patients had a 1-, 3- and 10-year progression free survival of 98%, 94% and 89%, respectively. Three-year progression free survival was 92.0% for those on active surveillance (IC95%, 91.5-92.5%), 95.2% for carboplatin (IC95%, 94.8-95.6%) and 100% for those on adjuvant radiotherapy (p > 0.05). All relapses on active surveillance protocols occurred during the first 24 months. Overall, 43% of patients who underwent adjuvant treatment reported adverse effects of therapy, with higher incidence on radiotherapy group (63%). Conclusions: Stage I seminoma have excellent prognosis, high cure rates, and low treatment-associated morbidity. Active surveillance is a safe modality when applied to selected patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin show similar results, with fewer adverse effects on chemotherapy arm.

Background and objectives: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is an independent and strong marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The Princeton Consensus aimed to evaluate and manage cardiovascular risk in men with ED and no known cardiovascular disease, focusing on identifying those requiring additional cardiologic work-up. It has recently been updated to the American population demographics, but European recommendations are needed. Methods: It was developed a cross-sectional investigation including erectile dysfunction patients. Data were collected from hospital registries. Two risk stratification models were employed and compared: Princeton Consensus Criteria (PC) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CVD Risk Criteria. The objective was to stress the importance of the changes in IV Princeton Consensus recommendations in stratifying CVD risk in men with erectile dysfunction using a model validated in European men. Results: A total of 137 patients with ED, with a mean age of 57.1 years old, were included. According to the PC criteria, 39.7% of the patients were “Low Risk”. When using ESC criteria, the proportion of “Low Risk” patients were significantly lower (12%, p < 0.05). Among “Low Risk” patients according to the PC, 52.5% and 20% were classified as High and Very high risk according to ESC criteria, respectively. One myocardial infarction was reported. The patient was classified as “Low Risk” according to the PC, but the ESC criteria categorized him as “high risk”. Conclusions: PC is less sensitive than ESC recommendations detecting CVD. It raises concerns that Urologists could be overlooking patients with undiagnosed CVD, consequently missing out on opportunities for prevention of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and premature deaths.