The absorption of oral drugs is frequently plagued by significant variability with potentially serious therapeutic consequences. The source of variability can be traced back to interindividual variability in physiology, differences in special populations (age- and disease-dependent), drug and formulation properties, or food-drug interactions. Clinical evidence for the impact of some of these factors on drug pharmacokinetic variability is mounting: e.g. gastric pH and emptying time, small intestinal fluid properties, differences in pediatrics and the elderly, and surgical changes in gastrointestinal anatomy. However, the link of colonic factors variability (transit time, fluid composition, microbiome), sex differences (male vs. female) and gut-related diseases (chronic constipation, anorexia and cachexia) to drug absorption variability has not been firmly established yet. At the same time, a way to decrease oral drug pharmacokinetic variability is provided by the pharmaceutical industry: clinical evidence suggests that formulation approaches employed during drug development can decrease the variability in oral exposure. This review outlines the main drivers of oral drug exposure variability and potential approaches to overcome them, while highlighting existing knowledge gaps and guiding future studies in this area.

The simultaneous intake of food and drugs can have a strong impact on drug release, absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or elimination and consequently, on the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy. As such, food-drug interactions are one of the main challenges in oral drug administration. Whereas pharmacokinetic (PK) food-drug interactions can have a variety of causes, pharmacodynamic (PD) food-drug interactions occur due to specific pharmacological interactions between a drug and particular drinks or food. In recent years, extensive efforts were made to elucidate the mechanisms that drive pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions. Their occurrence depends mainly on the properties of the drug substance, the formulation and a multitude of physiological factors. Every intake of food or drink changes the physiological conditions in the human gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, a precise understanding of how different foods and drinks affect the processes of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or elimination as well as formulation performance is important in order to be able to predict and avoid such interactions. Furthermore, it must be considered that beverages such as milk, grapefruit juice and alcohol can also lead to specific food-drug interactions. In this regard, the growing use of food supplements and functional food requires urgent attention in oral pharmacotherapy. Recently, a new consortium in Understanding Gastrointestinal Absorption-related Processes (UNGAP) was established through COST, a funding organisation of the European Union supporting translational research across Europe. In this review of the UNGAP Working group "Food-Drug Interface", the different mechanisms that can lead to pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions are discussed and summarised from different expert perspectives.

Ive FD patients (207 women, age 42 ± 0.8 yr), questionnaires were used to assess the dyspepsia symptom pattern and the Rome II criteria for IBS. The overall symptom severity was calculated adding the severity score (0–3, 0 = absent, 3 = severe) of eight dyspepsia symptoms. All patients underwent Helicobacter pylori testing, gastric barostat to determine sensitivity to distention and accommodation to a meal, and gastric emptying breath test. RESULTS Fifty-four percent of the patients had FD alone, whereas 46% had FD + IBS. FD + IBS patients were more likely to be female (75%vs 60%, p < 0.01) and to have a greater weight loss (5.4 ± 0.6 vs 3.5 ± 0.4 kg, p < 0.05). Coexisting IBS did not increase the risk of having any of the dyspeptic symptoms but the overall symptom severity was significantly higher in FD + IBS (12.4 ± 0.4 vs 9.8 ± 0.3, p < 0.01). FD + IBS patients had a lower threshold for first perception (2.9 ± 0.3 vs 3.8 ± 0.3 mmHg, p < 0.05) and for discomfort (7.9 ± 0.4 vs 9.5 ± 0.5 mmHg, p < 0.05) and a greater prevalence of hypersensitivity to gastric distention (44%vs 28%, p < 0.05). Gastric emptying, accommodation to a meal, and prevalence of H. pylori infection did not differ in the two groups. CONCLUSION About half of the FD patients fulfill the Rome II criteria for IBS. FD + IBS is more prevalent in female patients and is associated with a higher weight loss, with greater overall symptom severity, and with hypersensitivity to distention....

Background & Aims: Studies in health have shown that tension-sensitive mechanoreceptors mediate sensitivity to gastric distention. A role for these mechanoreceptors in perception or symptoms in hypersensitive functional dyspepsia (FD) has not been established. Tension-sensitive mechanoreceptors are activated during phasic contractions and inactivated during gastric relaxation. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether hypersensitive FD patients perceive spontaneous changes in fundic wall tension and whether fundus-relaxing drugs decrease sensitivity to gastric distention and meal-related symptoms. Methods: Fifty patients were selected after a barostat study established gastric hypersensitivity. In 12 patients, an intragastric balloon was inflated with a fixed volume just below perception thresholds and patients were asked to indicate changes in perception on a keypad, and the relationship between perception and contractions was analyzed. In 20 patients, we studied the influence of the fundus-relaxing drug sumatriptan on sensitivity to gastric distention. In, respectively, 10 and 8 patients, we studied the influence of the fundus-relaxing drugs sumatriptan and clonidine on meal-related symptoms. Results: The majority of patients had a statistically significant association between perception and phasic isovolumetric contractions. Pretreatment with sumatriptan increased both pressures and volumes needed to induce first perception and discomfort. Pretreatment with sumatriptan and clonidine both significantly decreased meal-induced symptoms. Conclusions: Patients with hypersensitivity to gastric distention perceive isovolumetric phasic contractions of the proximal stomach. Fundus-relaxing drugs decrease sensitivity to gastric distention and decrease meal-induced symptoms in these patients. The findings are compatible with involvement of tension mechanoreceptors in symptom generation in hypersensitive FD.