Liesel M. FitzGerald

Dr. Liesel M. FitzGerald

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7005, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 March 2013 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TIThe COGS–Cancer Research UK GWAS–ELLIPSE (part of GAME-ON) Initiative
The COGS–Cancer Research UK GWAS–ELLIPSE (part of GAME-ON) Initiative
RERosalind Eeles
Rosalind Eeles
TBThe Australian Prostate Cancer Bioresource
The Australian Prostate Cancer Bioresource
TOThe UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators/British Association of Urological Surgeons' Section of Oncology
The UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators/British Association of Urological Surgeons' Section of Oncology
TCThe UK ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) Study Collaborators
The UK ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) Study Collaborators
DEDouglas F Easton
Douglas F Easton

20 September 2009 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TOThe UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators/British Association of Urological Surgeons' Section of Oncology
The UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators/British Association of Urological Surgeons' Section of Oncology
RERosalind Eeles
Rosalind Eeles
TCThe UK ProtecT Study Collaborators
The UK ProtecT Study Collaborators
TCThe PRACTICAL Consortium
The PRACTICAL Consortium
ZKZsofia Kote-Jarai
Zsofia Kote-Jarai
DEDouglas F Easton
Douglas F Easton

10 July 2011 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TOThe UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators/British Association of Urological Surgeons' Section of Oncology
The UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study Collaborators/British Association of Urological Surgeons' Section of Oncology
ZKZsofia Kote-Jarai
Zsofia Kote-Jarai
TCThe PRACTICAL Consortium
The PRACTICAL Consortium
AOAli Amin Al Olama
Ali Amin Al Olama
GGGraham G Giles
Graham G Giles
RERosalind Eeles
Rosalind Eeles

20 December 2022 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ceres Fernández-RozadillaCeres Fernández-Rozadilla
Ceres Fernández-Rozadilla
MTMaria Timofeeva
Maria Timofeeva
ZCZhishan Chen
Zhishan Chen
PLPhilip Law
Philip Law
MTMinta Thomas
Minta Thomas
UPUlrike Peters
Ulrike Peters

1 April 2020 in Gastroenterology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAlexi N. Archambault
Alexi N. Archambault
YSYu-Ru Su
Yu-Ru Su
JJJihyoun Jeon
Jihyoun Jeon
MTMinta Thomas
Minta Thomas
YLYi Lin
Yi Lin
RHRichard B. Hayes
Richard B. Hayes

14 December 2009 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYong Zhu
Yong Zhu
RSRichard G. Stevens
Richard G. Stevens
AHAaron E. Hoffman
Aaron E. Hoffman
LFLiesel M. FitzGerald
Liesel M. FitzGerald
EKErika M. Kwon
Erika M. Kwon
JSJanet L. Stanford
Janet L. Stanford
Circadian genes are responsible for maintaining the ancient adaptation of a 24-hour circadian rhythm and influence a variety of cancer-related biological pathways, including the regulation of sex hormone levels. However, few studies have been undertaken to investigate the role of circadian genes in the development of prostate cancer, the most common cancer type among men (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer). The current genetic association study tested the circadian gene hypothesis in relation to prostate cancer by genotyping a total of 41 tagging and amino acid–altering single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 10 circadian-related genes in a population-based case-control study of Caucasian men (n = 1,308 cases and 1,266 controls). Our results showed that at least one SNP in nine core circadian genes (rs885747 and rs2289591 in PER1; rs7602358 in PER2; rs1012477 in PER3; rs1534891 in CSNK1E; rs12315175 in CRY1; rs2292912 in CRY2; rs7950226 in ARNTL; rs11133373 in CLOCK; and rs1369481, rs895521, and rs17024926 in NPAS2) was significantly associated with susceptibility to prostate cancer (either overall risk or risk of aggressive disease), and the risk estimate for four SNPs in three genes (rs885747 and rs2289591 in PER1, rs1012477 in PER3, and rs11133373 in CLOCK) varied by disease aggressiveness. Further analyses of haplotypes were consistent with these genotyping results. Findings from this candidate gene association study support the hypothesis of a link between genetic variants in circadian genes and prostate cancer risk, warranting further confirmation and mechanistic investigation of circadian biomarkers in prostate tumorigenesis. [Cancer Res 2009;69(24):9315–22]