Cesare Perotti

Prof. Cesare Perotti

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

6 March 2011 in International Journal of Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GCGiuseppe Cassinis
Giuseppe Cassinis
CPCesare Perotti
Cesare Perotti
Ausonio RonchiAusonio Ronchi
Ausonio Ronchi

1 June 2016 in Tectonophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPCesare Perotti
Cesare Perotti
LCLuca Chiariotti
Luca Chiariotti
IBIlenia Bresciani
Ilenia Bresciani
LCLuciano Cattaneo
Luciano Cattaneo
GTGiovanni Toscani
Giovanni Toscani


20 May 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNiccolò Menegoni
Niccolò Menegoni
DGDaniele Giordan
Daniele Giordan
CPCesare Perotti
Cesare Perotti
A stability investigation based on Digital Outcrop Models (DOMs) acquired in emergency conditions by photogrammetric surveys based on Remote Piloted Aerial System (RPAS) was conducted on an unstable rock slope near Gallivaggio (Western Alps, Italy). The predicted mechanism of failure and volume of the unstable portion of the slope were successively verified on the DOMs acquired after the rockfall that effectively collapsed the May 29th, 2018. The comparison of the pre- and post-landslide 3D models shows that the estimated mode of failure was substantially correct. At the same time, the predicted volume of rock involved in the landslide was overestimated by around 10%. To verify if this error was due to the limited accuracy of the models georeferenced in emergency considering only the Global Navigation Satellite System/Inertial Measurement Unit (GNSS/IMU)-information of RPAS, several Ground Control Points (GCPs) were acquired after the failure. The analyses indicate that the instrumental error in the volume calculation due to the direct-georeferencing method is only of the 1.7%. In contrast, the significant part is due to the geological uncertainty in the reconstruction of the real irregular geometry of the invisible part of the failure surface. The results, however, confirm the satisfying relative accuracy of the direct-georeferenced DOMs, compatible with most geological and geoengineering purposes.