Background: Despite important advancements in control and mechatronics of myoelectric prostheses, the communication between the user and his/her bionic limb is still unidirectional, as these systems do not provide somatosensory feedback. Electrotactile stimulation is an attractive technology to close the control loop since it allows flexible modulation of multiple parameters and compact interface design via multi-pad electrodes. However, the stimulation interferes with the recording of myoelectric signals and this can be detrimental to control. Methods: We present a novel compact solution for simultaneous recording and stimulation through dynamic blanking of stimulation artefacts. To test the system, a feedback coding scheme communicating wrist rotation and hand aperture was developed specifically to stress the myoelectric control while still providing meaningful information to the subjects. Ten subjects participated in an experiment, where the quality of closed-loop myoelectric control was assessed by controlling a cursor in a two degrees of freedom target-reaching task. The benchmark performance with visual feedback was compared to that achieved by combining visual feedback and electrotactile stimulation as well as by using electrotactile feedback only. Results: There was no significant difference in performance between visual and combined feedback condition with regards to successfully reached targets, time to reach a target, path efficiency and the number of overshoots. Therefore, the quality of myoelectric control was preserved in spite of the stimulation. As expected, the tactile condition was significantly poorer in completion rate (100/4% and 78/25% for combined and tactile condition, respectively) and time to reach a target (9/2 s and 13/4 s for combined and tactile condition, respectively). However, the performance in the tactile condition was still good, with no significant difference in path efficiency (38/8%) and the number of overshoots (0.5/0.4 overshoots), indicating that the stimulation was meaningful for the subjects and useful for closed-loop control. Conclusions: Overall, the results demonstrated that the developed system can provide robust closed-loop control using electrotactile stimulation. The system supports different encoding schemes and allows placing the recording and stimulation electrodes next to each other. This is an important step towards an integrated solution where the developed unit will be embedded into a prosthetic socket.

Electrotactile stimulation can be an attractive technology to restore tactile feedback in different application scenarios (e.g., virtual and augmented reality, tele-manipulation). This technology allows designing compact solutions with no mechanical elements that can integrate a high-density matrix of stimulation points. The present study introduced four novel multi-pad finger-electrode designs with different arrangements (two matrix and two circular) and shapes of active pads (producing sensation) and reference pads (ideally, no sensation produced below the pad). The electrodes were used to investigate the subjects' ability to spatially discriminate active pads within phalanges individually (6-9 pads) as well as across the full finger (18-19 pads). The tests were conducted in 12 subjects and the results showed that all designs led to high success rates when applied to the fingertip (70-81%). When tested on the full finger, the matrix and circular designs were characterized with similar performance (54-57%), and when the phalanges were analyzed individually, the spatial discrimination was best at the fingertip. Additionally, new approaches for faster amplitude calibration were proposed and tested, demonstrating that calibration duration can be reduced by approximately 40% compared to the standard approach of calibrating single pads individually. Finally, discrimination tests of dynamic tactile patterns were conducted using circular and matrix designs on the fingertip and full finger, respectively. The tests showed that the different patterns generated by the two arrangements could be clearly discriminated, especially in the case of full-finger matrix-style patterns. The present study, therefore, provides several important insights that are relevant when delivering tactile feedback to the finger using an electrotactile interface.

Multi-pad electrotactile stimulation can be used to provide tactile feedback in different applications. The electrotactile interface needs to be calibrated before each use, which entails adjusting the intensity to obtain clear sensations while allowing the subjects to differentiate between active pads. The present study investigated how the stimulation intensity affects the localization of sensations using a multi-pad electrode placed on a fingertip and proximal phalange. First, the sensation, localization, smearing and discomfort thresholds were determined in 11 subjects. Then, the same subjects performed a spatial discrimination test across a range of stimulation intensities. The results have shown that all thresholds were significantly different, while there was no difference in the threshold values between the pads and phalanges. Despite the subjective feeling of spreading of sensations, the success rates in spatial discrimination were not significantly different across the tested stimulation intensities. However, the performance was better for distal compared to proximal phalange. Presented results indicate that spatial discrimination is robust to changes in the stimulation intensity. Considering the lack of significant difference in the thresholds between the pads, these results imply that more coarse adjustment of stimulation amplitude (faster calibration) might be enough for practical applications of a multi-pad electrotactile interface.

Restoring tactile feedback in virtual reality can improve user experience and facilitate the feeling of embodiment. Electrotactile stimulation can be an attractive technology in this context as it is compact and allows for high-resolution spatially distributed stimulation. In the present study, a 32-channel tactile glove worn on the fingertips was used to provide tactile sensations during a virtual version of a rubber hand illusion experiment. To assess the benefits of multichannel stimulation, we modulated the spatial extent of feedback and its fidelity. Thirty-six participants performed the experiment in two conditions, in which stimulation was delivered to a single finger or all fingers, and three tactile stimulation types within each condition: no tactile feedback, simple single-point stimulation, and complex sliding stimulation mimicking the movements of the brush. Following each trial, the participants answered a multi-item embodiment questionnaire and reported the proprioceptive drift. The results confirmed that modulating the spatial extent of stimulation, from a single finger to all fingers, was indeed a successful strategy. When stimulating all fingers, tactile stimulation significantly improved all subjective measures compared to receiving no tactile stimulation. However, unexpectedly, the second strategy, that of modulating the fidelity of feedback, was not successful since there was no difference between the simple and complex tactile feedback in any of the measures. The results, therefore, imply that the effects of tactile feedback are better expressed in a more dynamic scenario (i.e., making/breaking contact and delivering stimulation to different body locations), while it still needs to be investigated if further improvements of the complex feedback can make it more effective compared to the simple approach.

This paper presents the development and validation of a novel stretchable dry hybrid electrode for electrotactile stimulation and EMG recording, designed for integration into prosthetic socket liners. Three electrode prototypes were compared: (1) dry stretchable electrode; (2) electrode with elevated pads via plastic layering beneath; (3) electrode with 3D-printed conductive plastic atop the pads. Six able-bodies subjects were recruited to assess the active stimulation range and subjective comfort and preference. Electrodes 1 and 3 showed comparable sensation and discomfort thresholds ($1.1-4.1 ~\text{mA}$), while electrode 2 exhibited a reduced dynamic range and higher pad failure rate. Four out of six participants preferred electrode 1. A prolonged 6hour test with electrode 1 confirmed stable stimulation thresholds over time in a single subject. The initial results indicate the feasibility of novel dry textile-integrated electrodes for providing feedback in closed-loop applications.