Cailong Chen

Prof. Dr. Cailong Chen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 August 2024 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HZHaodong Zhao
Haodong Zhao
YBYujie Bai
Yujie Bai
YLYujie Liu
Yujie Liu
YXYifei Xing
Yifei Xing
YYYilin Yan
Yilin Yan
ZZZheng Zhang
Zheng Zhang

2 September 2022 in BioMetals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CCCailong Chen
Cailong Chen
MLMenglan Lu
Menglan Lu
ZZZheng Zhang
Zheng Zhang
LQLi-Qiang Qin
Li-Qiang Qin

12 November 2025 in Nutrition & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZLZhong-Yue Liu
Zhong-Yue Liu
FFFei Fang
Fei Fang
YQYu-Wen Qian
Yu-Wen Qian
JGJi-Mei Gu
Ji-Mei Gu
JZJun-Yu Zhao
Jun-Yu Zhao
Guochong ChenGuochong Chen
Guochong Chen
Epidemiological trends indicate a concerning rise in early-onset cases of myocardial infarction (MI). We aimed to assess and compare the ability of plasma proteomics, conventional risk factors, and polygenic risk score (PRS) for the risk prediction of early-onset myocardial infarction (EOMI). Included were 13,097 participants aged 50 or younger, without prevalent cardiovascular diseases. The participants were randomly divided into training and validation sets. EOMI was defined as MI diagnosed before age 55. In the training set, 2,093 plasma proteins were assessed for the associations with incident EOMI using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Important proteins were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to develop protein-based models. The predictive performance of protein-based models, conventional risk factors, and PRS, either alone or as combinations, was assessed in the validation set. Two protein-based models were constructed using 22 key proteins selected by LASSO. Each standard-deviation increment of a weighted protein score was associated with a 2.57-fold higher risk of EOMI. Incorporating this protein score (ΔC-index = 0.125; 95% CI: 0.040, 0.213), a protein panel (ΔC-index = 0.189; 95% CI: 0.065, 0.276), or other conventional risk factors (ΔC-index = 0.158; 95% CI: 0.039, 0.239) each significantly improved the predictive performance over a basic model including age, sex, and race/ethnicity, whereas adding PRS did not. The combination of the protein panel and conventional risk factors demonstrated the best discrimination ability (C-index = 0.875; 95% CI: 0.814, 0.935). Plasma proteomics enhanced the risk prediction for EOMI beyond conventional risk factors and PRS. These findings may have implications for risk stratification and personalized prevention which prevent or delay the onset of myocardial infarction among relatively younger population.