Purpose: To analyze the structural variation of the aortic arch and the supra-aortic arteries and establish an average spatial configuration that would be a pattern for a “universal double fenestration” design for physician-modified endovascular grafts (PMEGs) used in total thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Materials and Methods: Aortic arch morphology was retrospectively analyzed by reviewing the preoperative thoracic computed tomography angiography scans in 33 consecutive patients (mean age 68 years; 27 men) treated between January 2017 and March 2019 using double-fenestrated PMEGs for zone 0 TEVAR. Image analysis was completed according to a standardized technique on a vascular workstation with center lumen line reconstruction for all measurements. Variations in branching pattern of the aortic arch were classified into 8 types. Results: The arch trunk configuration was type I in 26 patients (79%), type II in 5 (15%), type III in 1, and type IV in 1. Mean aortic diameters at the level of mid ascending aorta, innominate artery (IA), left common carotid artery (LCCA), and left subclavian artery (LSA) were 35.7±3.7, 34.2±4.5, 33.3±6.7, and 33.7±4.7 mm, respectively. Mean diameters of the trunk were 12.2±1.7, 7.5±1.4, and 8.0±0.8 mm, respectively. Mean longitudinal center to center lengths were 15.9±2.5 mm between the LSA and LCCA and 12.1±3.0 mm between the LCCA and IA. Mean clock positions using the LSA as reference were 12:50 for the IA and 12:05 for the LCCA. In 32 patients (97%) all the supra-aortic branch vessels fit perfectly inside two delimited areas defined by a proximal common square area of 30×30 mm for the IA and LCCA and a second distal 8-mm-diameter circle for the LSA. Conclusion: Variations of the aortic arch anatomy are numerous and common. A general morphological pattern is described that delimits the aortic area where these variations occur. This information can be utilized for the design of an off-the-shelf double-fenestrated stent-graft for zone 0 TEVAR.

: OBJECTIVES: The critical step in total endovascular aortic arch repair is to ensure alignment of fenestrations with, and thus maintenance of flow to, supra-aortic trunks. This experimental study evaluates the feasibility and accuracy of a double-fenestrated physician-modified endovascular graft [single common large fenestration for the brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery and a distal small fenestration for left subclavian artery (LSA) with a preloaded guidewire for the LSA] for total endovascular aortic arch repair. METHODS: Eight fresh human cadaveric thoracic aortas were harvested. Thoracic endografts with a physician-modified double fenestration were deployed for total endovascular aortic arch repair in a bench test model. A guidewire was preloaded through the distal fenestration for the LSA. All experiments were undertaken in a hybrid room under fluoroscopic guidance with subsequent angioscopy and open evaluation for assessment. RESULTS: Mean aortic diameter in zone 0 was 31.3 ± 3.33 mm. Mean duration for stent graft modification was 20.1 ± 5.8 min. Mean duration of the procedure was 24 ± 8.6 min. The Medtronic Valiant Captivia stent graft was used in 6 and the Cook Alpha Zenith thoracic stent graft in 2 cases. LSA catheterization was technically successful with supra-aortic trunk patency in 100% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a double-fenestrated stent graft with a preloaded guidewire appears to be a useful technical addition to facilitate easy and correct alignment of stent graft fenestrations with supra-aortic trunk origins.

• In the presence of extensive groin, the trans-iliac approach is feasible. • The trans-iliac approach is feasible and easy to perform with good outcomes. • The trans-iliac bypass increase the distance from the graft to the site of infection.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a well-established treatment for severe aortic stenosis across all levels of surgical risk. While transfemoral access remains the default approach, complications arising from vascular access—especially in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD)—pose significant challenges. Hostile vascular access, characterized by narrow vessel diameters, severe calcification, and tortuosity, complicates the procedure and necessitates alternative strategies. Recent advancements, such as intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), have shown promise in managing severely calcified arteries, improving the feasibility of transfemoral TAVR in patients previously considered ineligible. IVL uses pulsatile sonic waves to fragment arterial calcifications, enhancing vessel compliance and facilitating safe device delivery. Studies have demonstrated that IVL-assisted TAVR improves procedural success and reduces complications in patients with PAD. Additionally, orbital atherectomy, an adjunctive therapy targeting both concentric and eccentric calcifications, may complement the management of complex arterial calcification. The Hostile and passage–puncture scores offer valuable risk stratification tools for predicting vascular complications, aiding in better access site selection. Post-procedural echocardiography, particularly femoral artery sonography, may also play a role in detecting vascular complications early, enabling timely intervention. Finally, alternative access sites are increasingly being explored, with emerging data helping to guide the final access site decision. As TAVR continues to expand into lower risk populations, optimizing vascular access strategies remains essential to improving procedural outcomes. This review highlights the importance of preoperative imaging, endovascular techniques, and post-procedural monitoring in overcoming vascular challenges and ensuring successful TAVR outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Access-site complications (ASCs) remain clinically relevant after peripheral endovascular procedures, particularly with large femoral sheaths and complex anatomy. While randomized coronary trials show non-inferiority of vascular closure devices (VCDs) versus manual compression (MC), real-world data in peripheral interventions performed under systematic ultrasound-guided access are limited. Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort included consecutive peripheral arterial revascularizations (2010–2023) performed via common femoral access under real-time ultrasound guidance. Hemostasis was achieved using MC or VCDs, categorized as collagen plug-based, suture-mediated, or clip-based systems. The primary endpoint was 30-day ASCs, defined as hematoma requiring management, pseudoaneurysm, bleeding requiring transfusion, access-site thrombosis/occlusion, arteriovenous fistula, or infection. The secondary endpoint was VCD failure, defined as unsuccessful hemostasis requiring adjunctive measures. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for prespecified anatomical and procedural covariates, including sheath size > 6 Fr and puncture-site calcification. Results: Among 231 procedures, VCDs were used in 139 (60.2%) and MC in 92 (39.8%). ASC occurred in 28 cases (12.1%), with higher rates in the MC group compared with VCDs (18.5% vs. 9–14% across device types; p = 0.044). In adjusted analyses, MC (vs any VCD) (odds ratio [OR] 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–5.47; p = 0.035), sheath size > 6 Fr, and puncture-site calcification were independently associated with ASCs. VCD failure occurred in 5 cases (3.6%) and was not observed with collagen plug-based devices. Conclusions: In this ultrasound-guided real-world peripheral cohort, VCD use was associated with lower 30-day ASC rates and low device failure rates compared with MC. Given the retrospective and non-randomized design, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and support individualized, imaging-guided strategies for femoral closure in peripheral interventions.