The exercise treadmill test is widely used in the evaluation of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. The typical ischemic response used to be ST-segment depression.

(1) Background: Hyperkalemia is a common finding in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), though its prognostic significance is controversial. There is no consensus on optimal potassium levels in these patients. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the 5-year incidence of hyperkalemia in a cohort of patients with HFrEF. Secondary endpoints were to determine predictors of hyperkalemia and its impact on overall 5-year mortality; (2) Methods: retrospective, longitudinal, single-center observational study of patients with HFrEF followed-up in a specialized unit between 2011 and 2019. Hyperkalemia was considered as potassium concentration > 5.5 mEq/L; (3) Results: Hyperkalemia was observed in 170 (16.8%) of the 1013 patients. The 5-year hyperkalemia-free survival rate was 82.1%. Hyperkalemia was more frequent at the beginning of follow-up. Factors associated with hyperkalemia in the multivariate analysis were baseline potassium (HR 3.13, 95%CI 2.15–4.60; p < 0.001), creatinine clearance (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.98–0.99; p = 0.013), right ventricular function (HR 0.95, 95%CI 0.91–0.99; p = 0.016) and diabetes mellitus (HR 1.40, 95%CI 1.01–1.96; p = 0.047). The overall survival rate at 5 years was 76.4%. Normal–high potassium levels (5–5.5 mEq/L) were inversely associated with mortality (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.38–0.94; p = 0.025); (4) Conclusions: Hyperkalemia is a common finding in patients with HFrEF with an impact on the optimization of neurohormonal treatment. In our retrospective study, potassium levels in the normal–high range seem to be safe and are not associated with increased mortality.

Background/Objectives: Reduced-ejection-fraction heart failure (HFrEF) constitutes a challenge due to its high morbidity and mortality. The use of sacubitril/valsartan (angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitors [ARNI]) and SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) represents a change in management approach with a demonstrated association with positive ventricular remodeling and a reduction in cardiovascular events. We describe the clinical and therapeutic course of patients with HFrEF in a specialized unit, comparing two consecutive periods (2011–2016 vs. 2017–2021), with emphasis on the impact of ARNI and SGLT2i upon clinical parameters and the use of devices. Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal observational study was carried out in 1363 outpatients with HFrEF, with at least two years of follow-up. Clinical characteristics, treatments, the evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mortality, and the use of devices (implantable cardioverter–defibrillator [ICD], cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT]) were evaluated. Results: A total of 1363 patients were analyzed, showing a significant therapeutic change in the 2017–2021 group with the incorporation of ARNI (40%) and SGLT2i (25%). This cohort achieved better ventricular recovery, with a significantly higher mean LVEF at one year compared to the 2011–2016 group (44.3% vs. 42.1%; p = 0.004). Regarding devices, ICD implantation rate decreased in the recent period (7.2% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.016), while CRT indication increased. Most importantly, all-cause mortality after two years fell from 9.4% to 5.9% (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis confirmed that this survival improvement was independently associated with the study period (HR 1.57 for the earlier group) and was linked to the protective effect of contemporary pharmacological treatments. Conclusions: The systematic introduction of ARNI and SGLT2i in the treatment of HFrEF was associated with improved ventricular function, reduced need for device implantation, and lower mortality over the middle term in a real-life clinical setting.

Background/Objectives: Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disorder in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) have been shown to improve survival and decrease hospitalization rates, although they may increase the serum potassium levels. Hyperkalemia has significant clinical and economic implications, and is associated with increased healthcare resource utilization. The objective of the study was to analyze the management of hyperkalemia and the associated medical costs in a cohort of patients with HFrEF. Methods: An observational, longitudinal, retrospective, single-center retrospective study was conducted in patients with HFrEF who started follow-up in a heart failure unit between 2010 and 2021. Results: The study population consisted of 1181 patients followed-up on for 64.6 ± 38.8 months. During follow-up, 11,059 control visits were conducted, documenting 438 episodes of hyperkalemia in 262 patients (22.2%). Of the hyperkalemia episodes, 3.0% required assistance in the Emergency Department, 1.4% required hospitalization, and only 0.2% required admission to the Intensive Care Unit. No episode required renal replacement therapy. Reduction or withdrawal of RAASi was necessary in 69.9% of the hyperkalemia episodes. The total cost of the 438 hyperkalemia episodes was €89,178.82; the expense during the first year accounted for 48.8% of the total cost. Conclusions: Hyperkalemia is frequent in patients with HFrEF. It is often accompanied by a modification of treatment with RAASi. Hyperkalemia generates substantial costs in terms of healthcare resources and medical care, especially during the first year.

Background/Objectives: Traditionally, risk stratification in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients has been a static process. This study aims to identify clinical predictors and causes of mortality at different stages of the disease, distinguishing between early mortality (≤1 year) and late mortality (>1 year), as well as cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. Methods: This is an observational, longitudinal study of a cohort of 1510 patients with HFrEF followed up in a specialist heart failure unit between 2011 and 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups: alive (n = 1093), early mortality (n = 55) and late mortality (n = 362). Multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify mortality independent predictors in each period. Results: During the first year, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality showed a relatively balanced distribution, with a slight predominance of non-cardiovascular causes (52.8%). Progression of heart failure remained the leading individual cause of early death (38.2%). Independent predictors of early cardiovascular death included ischemic etiology (HR 2.78; 95% CI: 1.20–6.40; p = 0.01), NYHA functional class (HR 4.38; 95% CI: 2.18–8.81; p < 0.001) and renal function (HR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44–0.84; p = 0.002). In contrast, late mortality (>1 year) was predominantly due to non-cardiovascular causes (59.7%), notably cancer (24.3%) and infections (7.5%). Late all-cause mortality was independently associated with age (HR 1.35; 95% CI: 1.17–1.56; p < 0.001), hypertension (HR 1.38; 95% CI: 1.06–1.81; p = 0.015) and ischemic etiology (HR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.16–1.80; p < 0.001). In the follow-up, the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) emerged as a protective factor against long-term all-cause mortality (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63–0.94; p = 0.01) and, even more markedly, against late cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.33–0.66; p < 0.001), whereas baseline LVEF at diagnosis lacked significant predictive value in either model. Conclusions: Mortality in HFrEF is a dynamic process. Early survival is determined by hemodynamic stability, renal function and functional severity, whilst late survival is predominantly driven by non-cardiovascular comorbidities, biological aging, and ventricular remodeling trajectory. The improvement of LVEF during follow-up is a more reliable prognostic marker than the baseline measurement, suggesting that clinical management should shift from early pharmacological optimization towards a multidisciplinary approach focused on long-term non-cardiovascular risk.

Background/Objectives: Sex-related differences in prognosis among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have been described, but their association with long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality remains incompletely characterised. This study investigated these associations in a real-world HFrEF cohort, accounting for non-cardiovascular death as a competing event. Methods: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, longitudinal observational study of 1510 consecutive patients with HFrEF followed between 2011 and 2023; 1158 (76.7%) were men and 352 (23.3%) were women. All-cause mortality was assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox regression. Multivariable models used a complete-case approach. Cardiovascular mortality was analysed using cause-specific Cox regression and the Fine–Gray model, with non-cardiovascular death and death of unknown cause treated as competing events. Interaction terms between sex and year of inclusion were used to assess potential changes in the association across the study period. Results: No statistically significant between-sex difference in cumulative all-cause mortality was detected at one year (3.7% in men vs. 3.8% in women; p = 0.95). Exploratory pointwise comparisons showed higher cumulative mortality in men at five years (24.8% vs. 16.0%; p = 0.002) and ten years (49.3% vs. 39.8%; p = 0.046). After multivariable adjustment, male sex was associated with higher all-cause mortality (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.47–2.59; p < 0.001). Male sex was also associated with cardiovascular mortality in the cause-specific analysis (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.54–3.92; p < 0.001) and after accounting for non-cardiovascular death as a competing event (subdistribution HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.32–3.39; p = 0.002). No significant interaction was observed between sex and year of inclusion. Conclusions: In this real-world HFrEF cohort, male sex remained associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for measured baseline covariates. The association with cardiovascular mortality persisted in competing-risk analysis. These observational findings do not establish a causal or time-varying effect of sex.