Impairment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is common amongst those with left heart disease and is associated with significant morbidity. Given that, in simple terms, the ventricle can only eject the volume with which it fills and that approximately one half of hospitalisations for heart failure (HF) are in those with normal/’preserved’ left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) (Bianco et al. in JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 13:258–271, 2020. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.035), where abnormalities of ventricular filling are the cause of symptoms, it is clear that the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function (LVDF) is crucial for understanding global cardiac function and for identifying the wider effects of disease processes. Invasive methods of measuring LV relaxation and filling pressures are considered the gold-standard for investigating diastolic function. However, the high temporal resolution of trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) with widely validated and reproducible measures available at the patient’s bedside and without the need for invasive procedures involving ionising radiation have established echocardiography as the primary imaging modality. The comprehensive assessment of LVDF is therefore a fundamental element of the standard TTE (Robinson et al. in Echo Res Pract7:G59–G93, 2020. 10.1530/ERP-20-0026). However, the echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is complex. In the broadest and most basic terms, ventricular diastole comprises an early filling phase when blood is drawn, by suction, into the ventricle as it rapidly recoils and lengthens following the preceding systolic contraction and shortening. This is followed in late diastole by distension of the compliant LV when atrial contraction actively contributes to ventricular filling. When LVDF is normal, ventricular filling is achieved at low pressure both at rest and during exertion. However, this basic description merely summarises the complex physiology that enables the diastolic process and defines it according to the mechanical method by which the ventricles fill, overlooking the myocardial function, properties of chamber compliance and pressure differentials that determine the capacity for LV filling. Unlike ventricular systolic function where single parameters are utilised to define myocardial performance (LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS)), the assessment of diastolic function relies on the interpretation of multiple myocardial and blood-flow velocity parameters, along with left atrial (LA) size and function, in order to diagnose the presence and degree of impairment. The echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function is therefore multifaceted and complex, requiring an algorithmic approach that incorporates parameters of myocardial relaxation/recoil, chamber compliance and function under variable loading conditions and the intra-cavity pressures under which these processes occur. This guideline outlines a structured approach to the assessment of diastolic function and includes recommendations for the assessment of LV relaxation and filling pressures. Non-routine echocardiographic measures are described alongside guidance for application in specific circumstances. Provocative methods for revealing increased filling pressure on exertion are described and novel and emerging modalities considered. For rapid access to the core recommendations of the diastolic guideline, a quick-reference guide (additional file 1) accompanies the main guideline document. This describes in very brief detail the diastolic investigation in each patient group and includes all algorithms and core reference tables.

Since cardiac ultrasound was introduced into medical practice around the middle twentieth century, transthoracic echocardiography has developed to become a highly sophisticated and widely performed cardiac imaging modality in the diagnosis of heart disease. This evolution from an emerging technique with limited application, into a complex modality capable of detailed cardiac assessment has been driven by technological innovations that have both refined ‘standard’ 2D and Doppler imaging and led to the development of new diagnostic techniques. Accordingly, the adult transthoracic echocardiogram has evolved to become a comprehensive assessment of complex cardiac anatomy, function and haemodynamics. This guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography aims to outline the minimum dataset required to confirm normal cardiac structure and function when performing a comprehensive standard adult echocardiogram and is structured according to the recommended sequence of acquisition. It is recommended that this structured approach to image acquisition and measurement protocol forms the basis of every standard adult transthoracic echocardiogram. However, when pathology is detected and further analysis becomes necessary, views and measurements in addition to the minimum dataset are required and should be taken with reference to the appropriate British Society of Echocardiography imaging protocol. It is anticipated that the recommendations made within this guideline will help standardise the local, regional and national practice of echocardiography, in addition to minimising the inter and intra-observer variation associated with echocardiographic measurement and interpretation.

Mitral valve disease is common. Mitral regurgitation is the second most frequent indication for valve surgery in Europe and despite the decline of rheumatic fever in western societies, mitral stenosis of any aetiology is a regular finding in all echo departments. Mitral valve disease is therefore one of the most common pathologies encountered by echocardiographers, as both a primary indication for echocardiography and a secondary finding when investigating other cardiovascular disease processes. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) play a crucial role in the assessment of mitral valve disease and are essential to identifying the aetiology, mechanism and severity of disease and for helping determine the appropriate timing and method of intervention. This guideline, from the British Society of Echocardiography (BSE), describes the assessment of mitral regurgitation and mitral stenosis and replaces previous BSE guidelines describing the echocardiographic assessment of mitral anatomy prior to mitral valve repair surgery and percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. It provides a comprehensive description of the imaging techniques (and their limitations) employed in the assessment of mitral valve disease. It describes a step-wise approach to identifying: aetiology and mechanism, disease severity, reparability and secondary effects on chamber geometry, function and pressures. Advanced echocardiographic techniques are described for both transthoracic and transoesophageal modalities, including TOE and exercise testing.

Background: Elite cycling can be dichotomised into road (endurance cycling) and track (sprint cycling) events that are associated with different training components and athlete physiology. Evidence of disproportionate right ventricular (RV) remodelling in endurance athletes places importance on defining physiological and athletic phenotypes. Therefore, the elite cyclist serves as an ideal model to study training-specific adaptations in the right heart. Methods: One hundred and eighty-six (110 males and 76 females) elite international-level cyclists (mean age 23 ± 5 years) were grouped by discipline (endurance cycling and sprint cycling) and sex (male cyclists and female cyclists). RV and right atrial (RA) structure and function was assessed with 2D, tissue Doppler, and strain echocardiography. Structural data were scaled allometrically to body size. Group comparisons were made with a two-way ANOVA. Results: Significantly larger absolute and scaled RV and RA structural values were seen in male and endurance cyclists (RV end diastolic area index: male endurance 14 ± 2 cm²/m², male sprint 13 ± 2 cm²/m²) than female and sprint cyclists (female endurance 13 ± 2 cm²/m², female sprint 11 ± 2 cm²/m²), respectively. Endurance training exposure was significantly correlated to structural parameters (RA area index: r = 0.53; p < 0.001). Sex and discipline showed significant impact on resting RV function with reduced RV strain values in male and endurance cyclists (RV basal strain: male endurance −17.5 ± 4.0%, male sprint −19.4 ± 4.6%) compared to female and sprint cyclists (female endurance −19.9 ± 3.9%, female sprint −22.1 ± 5.1%), respectively. There were no significant correlations between training exposure and resting RV function. Conclusions: Athlete sex and cycling discipline exert significant effects on RV and RA structure and function in elite cyclists. The strong correlations observed between endurance training exposure and right heart structure emphasise the importance of consideration of sporting discipline in elite athletes.

Background: Elite athletes frequently exceed conventional left ventricular (LV) and left atrial thresholds when guideline‐recommended linear scaling for body size is applied, prompting unnecessary investigation. Few athlete‐specific allometric equations yield percentage predicted values or Z scores. We aimed to develop allometric equations for LV and left atrial structure and function in elite cyclists, accounting for body size, sex, discipline, and heart rate, and to compare these with body surface area (BSA) indexing. Methods: We evaluated 181 elite cyclists (105 male, 76 female; age 22.7±5.5 years; 128 endurance, 53 sprint) with normal preparticipation cardiac screening. Weighted least squares allometric regression determined optimal scaling exponents for height, weight, and BSA, with models advancing in complexity only when prediction accuracy significantly improved. Equations were externally validated in 62 independent elite male endurance cyclists. Results: Men had larger BSA‐scaled LV and left atrial size than women (both P <0.001). Many cyclists exceeded conventional thresholds (American Society of Echocardiography 2015: LV end‐diastolic volume indexed to BSA 69.6%, LV end‐systolic volume indexed to BSA 62.9%; British Society of Echocardiography 2020: LV end‐diastolic volume indexed to BSA 50.8%, left atrial volume indexed to BSA 28.7%). Height provided superior allometric fit versus weight or BSA. Height, sex, discipline, and RR interval were key determinants. On external validation, only 6.5% exceeded the Z score threshold for LV end‐diastolic volume indexed to BSA, compared with 90.3% classified abnormal by ASE guidelines. Conclusions: Height‐based allometric scaling outperformed weight or BSA for cardiac dimensions and function in elite cyclists. These sport‐specific equations, validated in an independent cohort, provide clinically usable percentage predicted values and Z scores that permit quantitative assessment rather than binary thresholds and may reduce misclassification of physiological adaptation as disease in preparticipation cardiac screening programs.

Background: Structural and functional adaptation of the heart to chronic exercise is dependent on multiple factors, including the volume and type of training, and has direct implications for pre-participation cardiac screening (PPCS). Sailing is a unique multi-training modality sport with limited prior description of cardiac adaptation to training. The aims of this study are (1) to describe electrocardiogram (ECG) changes in sailors, informing PPCS guidelines; (2) to assess structural and functional cardiac changes in sailors; and (3) to examine sex- or discipline-specific cardiac adaptations in sailors. Methods: Seventy elite sailors (33 females) underwent standard ECG and echocardiography. Echocardiographic data were compared to population norms and analysed by sex and sailing discipline based on training type: isometric (IG), pumping (PG), and movement (MG). Results: One sailor presented with abnormal ECG findings (T wave inversion) which warranted further investigation. Primary training-related ECG changes noted were early repolarisation (24%) and sinus bradycardia (30%). The left ventricular volume index was dilated in 18% of all sailors compared to reference values, with similar findings noted on right ventricular parameters for 22% of the study population, although in males only. The impact of predominant training stimulus (IG, PG, MG) did not mediate differences in the structure of any cardiac chambers (p > 0.05). Ejection fraction was lower in the PG (Δ4%, p ≤ 0.001), whereas global longitudinal strain was higher (Δ2%, p = 0.02) compared to MG and IG. Conclusions: Elite-level sailors present with electrical and structural cardiac phenotypes associated with exercise adaptation, with dilation of both left- and right-sided chambers. These data should be considered when interpreting results of PPCS in male and female sailors from different, specific disciplines.