INTRODUCTION: Although the 9-minute mean withdrawal time (m-WT) is often reported to be associated with the optimal adenoma detection rate (ADR), no randomized trials of screening colonoscopy have confirmed the impact of a 9-minute m-WT on adenoma miss rate (AMR) and ADR. METHODS: A multicenter tandem trial was conducted in 11 centers. Seven hundred thirty-three asymptomatic participants were randomized to receive segmental tandem screening colonoscopy with a 9-minute withdrawal, followed by a 6-minute withdrawal (9-minute-first group, 9MF, n = 366) or vice versa (6-minute-first group, 6MF, n = 367). The primary outcome was the lesion-level AMR. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that 9MF significantly reduced the lesion-level (14.5% vs 36.6%, P < 0.001) and participant-level AMR (10.9% vs 25.9%, P < 0.001), advanced adenoma miss rate (AAMR, 5.3% vs 46.9%, P = 0.002), multiple adenomas miss rate (20.7% vs 56.5%, P = 0.01), and high-risk adenomas miss rate (14.6% vs 39.5%, P = 0.01) of 6MF without compromising detection efficiency ( P = 0.79). In addition, a lower false-negative rate for adenomas ( P = 0.002) and high-risk adenomas ( P < 0.05), and a lower rate of shortening surveillance schedule ( P < 0.001) were also found in 9MF, accompanying with an improved ADR in the 9-minute vs 6-minute m-WT (42.3% vs 33.5%, P = 0.02). The independent inverse association between m-WT and AMR remained significant even after adjusting ADR, and meanwhile, 9-minute m-WT was identified as an independent protector for AMR and AAMR. DISCUSSION: In addition to increasing ADR, 9-minute m-WT also significantly reduces the AMR and AAMR of screening colonoscopy without compromising detection efficiency.
12 April 2021 in Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic value of gastrin-17 (G-17) and pepsinogen (PG) in gastric cancer (GC) screening in China, especially eastern China, and to determine the best diagnostic combination and threshold (cutoff values) to screen out patients who need gastroscopy. Methods. The serum concentrations of G-17 and pepsinogen I and II (PGI and PGII) in 834 patients were analyzed, and the PGI/PGII ratio (PGR) was calculated. According to pathological results, patients can be divided into chronic nonatrophic gastritis (NAG)/chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG)/intraepithelial neoplasia (IN)/GC groups. The differences in G-17, PG, and PGR in each group were analyzed, and their values in GC diagnosis were evaluated separately and in combination. Results. There were differences in serum G-17, PGII, and PGR among the four groups (NAG/CAG/IN/GC) ( ). In total, 54 GC cases were diagnosed, of which 50% were early GC. There was no significant difference in the PGI levels among the four groups ( ). NAG and CAG composed the chronic gastritis (CG) group. The G-17 and PGII levels in the IN and GC groups were higher than those in the CG group (both ), while the PGR levels were lower ( ). When distinguishing NAG from CAG, the best cutoff value for G-17 was 9.25 pmol/L, PGII was 7.06 μg/L, and PGR was 12.07. When distinguishing CG from IN, the best cutoff value for G-17 was 3.86 pmol/L, PGII was 11.92 μg/L, and PGR was 8.26. When distinguishing CG from GC, the best cutoff value for G-17 was 3.89 pmol/L, PGII was 9.16 μg/L, and PGR was 14.14. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of G-17/PGII/PGR for GC diagnosis were 83.3%/70.4%/79.6%, 51.8%/56.3%/47.8%, 53.8%/57.2%/49.9%, 10.7%/10.9%/9.6%, and 97.8%/96.5%/97.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive and negative predictive values of PGII/G-17 vs. PGR/G-17 vs. PGR/PGII in the diagnosis of GC were 63.0% vs. 70.4% vs. 64.8%, 70.5% vs. 70.1% vs. 60.4%, 70.0% vs. 70.1% vs. 60.7%, 12.9% vs. 14.0% vs. 10.2%, and 96.5% vs. 97.2% vs. 96.1%, respectively. Conclusion. The PGII and G-17 levels in patients with gastric IN and GC were significantly increased, while the serum PGR level was significantly decreased. Serological detection is effective for screening GC. The combination of different markers can improve the diagnostic efficiency. The highest diagnostic accuracy was G-17 combined with PGR, and the best cutoff values were and .
14 December 2022 in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease with very poor outcomes. However, the order of induction and coordinated interactions of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS) and the potential mechanisms in AP are still unclear.Methods: An integrative analysis was performed based on transcripts of blood from patients with different severity levels of AP (GSE194331), as well as impaired lung (GSE151572), liver (GSE151927) and pancreas (GSE65146) samples from an AP experimental model to identify inflammatory signals and immune response-associated susceptibility genes. An AP animal model was established in wild-type (WT) mice and Tlr2-deficient mice by repeated intraperitoneal injection of cerulein. Serum lipase and amylase, pancreas impairment and neutrophil infiltration were evaluated to assess the effects of Tlr2 in vivo.Results: The numbers of anti-inflammatory response-related cells, such as M2 macrophages (P = 3.2 × 10–3), were increased with worsening AP progression, while the numbers of pro-inflammatory response-related cells, such as neutrophils (P = 3.0 × 10–8), also increased. Then, 10 immune-related AP susceptibility genes (SOSC3, ITGAM, CAMP, FPR1, IL1R1, TLR2, S100A8/9, HK3 and MMP9) were identified. Finally, compared with WT mice, Tlr2-deficient mice exhibited not only significantly reduced serum lipase and amylase levels after cerulein induction but also alleviated pancreatic inflammation and neutrophil accumulation.Discussion: In summary, we discovered SIRS and CARS were stimulated in parallel, not activated consecutively. In addition, among the novel susceptibility genes, TLR2might be a novel therapeutic target that mediates dysregulation of inflammatory responses during AP progression.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is an uncommon type of malignant hematological neoplasm which, besides primarily involving the bone marrow, has a potent tendency to involve other organs and to present with various clinical manifestations. Involvement of the gastrointestinal (GI) system, particularly presenting with GI hemorrhage, in the course of MM is extremely rare. In the present study, we report a case of a middle‑aged male who initially demonstrated GI bleeding and was finally diagnosed with MM. Further laboratory examinations, including analysis of globulin in the blood, bone marrow aspiration and radiogram, supported this diagnosis. This case may promote the possible involvement of plasma cell myeloma in the differential diagnosis of patients with unexplained and refractory GI bleeding. In this study we also present a thorough review of the literature with regard to the association between MM and GI hemorrhage.
1 November 2024 in International Immunopharmacology