Derek Yellon

Prof. Derek Yellon

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

48Years (1979-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 September 2007 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DYDerek Yellon
Derek Yellon
DHDerek Hausenloy
Derek Hausenloy
Lethal reperfusion injury is a paradoxical type of myocardial injury caused by the restoration of coronary blood flow after an ischemic episode. This review focuses on the mechanisms of the injury, on attempts to protect the heart against it, and on promising new approaches to cardioprotection during percutaneous coronary intervention.

2 January 2013 in Journal of Clinical Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DHDerek Hausenloy
Derek Hausenloy
DYDerek Yellon
Derek Yellon
Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. In patients with MI, the treatment of choice for reducing acute myocardial ischemic injury and limiting MI size is timely and effective myocardial reperfusion using either thombolytic therapy or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, the process of reperfusion can itself induce cardiomyocyte death, known as myocardial reperfusion injury, for which there is still no effective therapy. A number of new therapeutic strategies currently under investigation for preventing myocardial reperfusion injury have the potential to improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute MI treated with PPCI.

11 May 2010 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SOSang Bing Ong
Sang Bing Ong
SSSapna Subrayan
Sapna Subrayan
SLShiang Yong Lim
Shiang Yong Lim
DYDerek Yellon
Derek Yellon
SDSean M. Davidson
Sean M. Davidson
DHDerek Hausenloy
Derek Hausenloy
Background— Whether alterations in mitochondrial morphology affect the susceptibility of the heart to ischemia/reperfusion injury is unknown. We hypothesized that modulating mitochondrial morphology protects the heart against ischemia/reperfusion injury. Methods and Results— In response to ischemia, mitochondria in HL-1 cells (a cardiac-derived cell line) undergo fragmentation, a process that is dependent on the mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1). Transfection of HL-1 cells with the mitochondrial fusion proteins mitofusin 1 or 2 or with Drp1 K38A , a dominant-negative mutant form of Drp1, increased the percentage of cells containing elongated mitochondria (65±4%, 69±5%, and 63±6%, respectively, versus 46±6% in control: n=80 cells per group; P <0.05), decreased mitochondrial permeability transition pore sensitivity (by 2.4±0.5-, 2.3±0.7-, and 2.4±0.3-fold, respectively; n=80 cells per group; P <0.05), and reduced cell death after simulated ischemia/reperfusion injury (11.6±3.9%, 16.2±3.9%, and 12.1±2.9%, respectively, versus 41.8±4.1% in control: n=320 cells per group; P <0.05). Treatment of HL-1 cells with mitochondrial division inhibitor-1, a pharmacological inhibitor of Drp1, replicated these beneficial effects. Interestingly, elongated interfibrillar mitochondria were identified in the adult rodent heart with confocal and electron microscopy, and in vivo treatment with mitochondrial division inhibitor-1 increased the percentage of elongated mitochondria from 3.6±0.5% to 14.5±2.8% ( P =0.023). Finally, treatment of adult murine cardiomyocytes with mitochondrial division inhibitor-1 reduced cell death and inhibited mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening after simulated ischemia/reperfusion injury, and in vivo treatment with mitochondrial division inhibitor-1 reduced myocardial infarct size in mice subject to coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion (21.0±2.2% with mitochondrial division inhibitor-1 versus 48.0±4.5% in control; n=6 animals per group; P <0.05). Conclusion— Inhibiting mitochondrial fission protects the heart against ischemia/reperfusion injury, suggesting a novel pharmacological strategy for cardioprotection.

1 July 1988 in Cardiovascular Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWM J A Walker
M J A Walker
MCM J Curtis
M J Curtis
DHD J Hearse
D J Hearse
RCR W F Campbell
R W F Campbell
MJM J Janse
M J Janse
BWB Woodward
B Woodward
The Lambeth Conventions are guidelines intended to be of practical value in the investigation of arrhythmias induced by ischaemia, infarction, and reperfusion. They cover the design and execution of experiments and the definition, classification, quantification, and analysis of arrhythmias. Investigators are encouraged to adopt the conventions in the hope that this will improve uniformity and interlaboratory comparisons.

9 February 2017 in Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJohn V McGowan
John V McGowan
RCRobin Chung
Robin Chung
AMAngshuman Maulik
Angshuman Maulik
IPIzabela Piotrowska
Izabela Piotrowska
JWJ Malcolm Walker
J Malcolm Walker
DYDerek Yellon
Derek Yellon
Anthracycline chemotherapy maintains a prominent role in treating many forms of cancer. Cardiotoxic side effects limit their dosing and improved cancer outcomes expose the cancer survivor to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The basic mechanisms of cardiotoxicity may involve direct pathways for reactive oxygen species generation and topoisomerase 2 as well as other indirect pathways. Cardioprotective treatments are few and those that have been examined include renin angiotensin system blockade, beta blockers, or the iron chelator dexrazoxane. New treatments exploiting the ErbB or other novel pro-survival pathways, such as conditioning, are on the cardioprotection horizon. Even in the forthcoming era of targeted cancer therapies, the substantial proportion of today’s anthracycline-treated cancer patients may become tomorrow’s cardiac patient.

1 October 2003 in Physiological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DYDerek Yellon
Derek Yellon
JDJames M. Downey
James M. Downey
Yellon, Derek M., and James M. Downey. Preconditioning the Myocardium: From Cellular Physiology to Clinical Cardiology. Physiol Rev 83: 1113-1151, 2003; 10.1152/physrev.00009.2003.—The phenomenon of ischemic preconditioning, in which a period of sublethal ischemia can profoundly protect the cell from infarction during a subsequent ischemic insult, has been responsible for an enormous amount of research over the last 15 years. Ischemic preconditioning is associated with two forms of protection: a classical form lasting ∼2 h after the preconditioning ischemia followed a day later by a second window of protection lasting ∼3 days. Both types of preconditioning share similarities in that the preconditioning ischemia provokes the release of several autacoids that trigger protection by occupying cell surface receptors. Receptor occupancy activates complex signaling cascades which during the lethal ischemia converge on one or more end-effectors to mediate the protection. The end-effectors so far have eluded identification, although a number have been proposed. A range of different pharmacological agents that activate the signaling cascades at the various levels can mimic ischemic preconditioning leading to the hope that specific therapeutic agents can be designed to exploit the profound protection seen with ischemic preconditioning. This review examines, in detail, the complex mechanisms associated with both forms of preconditioning as well as discusses the possibility to exploit this phenomenon in the clinical setting. As our understanding of the mechanisms associated with preconditioning are unravelled, we believe we can look forward to the development of new therapeutic agents with novel mechanisms of action that can supplement current treatment options for patients threatened with acute myocardial infarction.