The number of homeless people has been constantly increasing in Europe over recent years, as well as the proportion of women among the homeless population. Pregnancy can increase the risk of becoming homeless and, on the other hand, homelessness has been widely connected to adverse perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to describe the overall perceived impact of homelessness on health during pregnancy and the postpartum period, using a qualitative research approach to prioritize women’s perspective. One-time semi structured interviews were conducted with 10 pregnant women and 10 women in the postpartum period experiencing homelessness in the metropolitan area of Nantes, as well as with six people from their social surroundings. A thematic analysis was performed to identify major themes and sub-themes. Homelessness was perceived as having an overall negative impact on all aspects of health (physical health, mental health, and social well-being) during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Stress and anxiety, food insecurity, social isolation, physical suffering, deterioration of chronic diseases, and pregnancy complications, were the main perceived consequences of homelessness on health. On the other hand, social support, and the “welcomeness” of healthcare professionals during pregnancy and the postpartum period were identified as capable of palliating those consequences. Finally, basic needs, such as having access to suitable housing, being independent, and being in good health, were identified by participants in the study as their main priorities. The results of this study, as well as those found by previous research, allowed us to identify possible axes in tackling homelessness and its complex consequences on health during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Housing and income assistance interventions, promoting social support and employment, outreach services enhancing collaborative networks among healthcare service providers, and integrating coordinated multidisciplinary approaches in primary care have shown to provide promising solutions to this issue.

Vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies provide real-world evidence to monitor vaccine performance and inform policy. The WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean supported a regional study to assess the VE of COVID-19 vaccines against different clinical outcomes in four countries between June 2021 and August 2023. Health worker cohort studies were conducted in 2707 health workers in Egypt and Pakistan, of whom 171 experienced symptomatic laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Test-negative design case–control studies were conducted in Iran and Jordan in 4017 severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) patients (2347 controls and 1670 cases) during the Omicron variant dominant period. VE estimates were calculated for each study and pooled by study design for several vaccine types (BBIBP-CorV, AZD1222, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273, among others). Among health workers, VE against symptomatic infection of a complete primary series could only be computed compared to partial vaccination, suggesting a benefit of providing an additional dose of mRNA vaccines (VE: 88.9%, 95%CI: 15.3–98.6%), while results were inconclusive for other vaccine products. Among SARI patients, VE against hospitalization of a complete primary series with any vaccine compared to non-vaccinated was 20.9% (95%CI: 4.5–34.5%). Effectiveness estimates for individual vaccines, booster doses, and secondary outcomes (intensive care unit admission and death) were inconclusive. Future VE studies will need to address challenges in both design and analysis when conducted late during a pandemic and will be able to utilize the strengthened capacities in countries.

Background/Objectives: Health Promotion Centres (HPCs) in Slovenia represent a European best practice for integrated prevention and health promotion. This study explores the feasibility of adapting the Slovenian HPC model to Bergamo Province, Lombardy, considering local population needs and health system characteristics. Methods: We conducted a qualitative feasibility and policy analysis based primarily on documentary review, complemented by a webinar, a study visit to Slovenia, and expert consultations (conducted in two group discussions) with professionals from ATS (Agenzia Tutela della Salute) Bergamo and local ASST (Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale) providers. Data were analysed using the PIET-T framework (Population–Intervention–Environment–Transfer). Results: Eight key elements define the Slovenian model: (1) governance and stewardship; (2) structural financing; (3) standardized service portfolio; (4) systematic preventive referrals; (5) integration with primary care and screening; (6) multidisciplinary teams with codified training; (7) community outreach and equity orientation; and (8) information systems and reporting. While Bergamo shares similar demographic and epidemiological profiles, differences in behavioral risk factors, project-based financing, fragmented initiatives, and limited digital integration necessitate adaptation. The comparative assessment highlighted key areas requiring contextual adaptation, including financing mechanisms, organisational coordination, workforce capacity, digital interoperability, and approaches to equity. Conclusions: The Slovenian HPC experience demonstrates the potential of integrated, community-based health promotion. Its adaptation to Lombardy appears feasible if core components are preserved and tailored to local governance, population, and health system conditions. These organisational features may be particularly relevant for time-dependent conditions, such as acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, by potentially supporting more timely risk-factor management and coordination across diagnostic and emergency pathways. Rather than a blueprint for reform, this experience offers useful insights to reinforce prevention and health promotion within the ongoing territorial care reform in Lombardy.

Objective: This study investigated the perspectives of companies in the Province of Bergamo regarding the use of an interactive tool designed to support the application of the STOP principle to prevent work-related cancerogenic exposure, with the aim to inform potential national adoption in Italy. Methods: A qualitative approach was used. Two online focus groups were conducted with five companies operating in high-risk sectors, involving 15 participants per session, including Health, Safety and Environment managers and workers' representatives. Results: Three overarching themes emerged from the analysis: i) ease of use and perceived utility, ii) operational challenges, and iii) proposals for improvement. Conclusions: Applying the STOP principle through digital tools offers companies a concrete opportunity to enhance occupational cancer prevention in Italy, representing both a technical advance and a broader political and cultural commitment to systematic prevention.