ANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE

Dr. ANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 January 2020 in International Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AGANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
ANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
AOAlejandro Orrico-Sánchez
Alejandro Orrico-Sánchez
CMCintia Muñoz-Quiles
Cintia Muñoz-Quiles
IHIsabel Hurtado
Isabel Hurtado
SPSalvador Peiró
Salvador Peiró
JDJAVIER DIEZ DOMINGO
JAVIER DIEZ DOMINGO

6 August 2024 in Diabetologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IHIsabel Hurtado
Isabel Hurtado
CRCelia Robles
Celia Robles
SPSalvador Peiró
Salvador Peiró
AGANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
ANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
GSGabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno
Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno
Aims/hypothesis: Regulators worldwide are reviewing safety data on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), following reports by the Icelandic Medicines Agency in July 2023 of suicidal ideation and self-injury (SIS) in individuals taking liraglutide and semaglutide. We aimed to assess the risk of SIS in new users of GLP-1RA when compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) users, prescribed to treat type 2 diabetes in individuals with obesity. Methods: This is a cohort study combining several population-wide databases and covering a Spanish population of five million inhabitants, including all adults with obesity who initiated treatment with either GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i for type 2 diabetes from 2015 to 2021. To estimate the comparative effect of GLP-1RA on the risk of SIS, we employed a new user, active comparator design and we carried out multivariable Cox regression modelling with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores. We performed several stratified and sensitivity analyses. Results: We included 3040 patients initiating treatment with GLP-1RA and 11,627 with SGLT-2i. When compared with patients treated with SGLT-2i, those in the GLP-1RA group were younger (55 vs 60 years old, p<0.001), had more anxiety (49.4% vs 41.5%, p<0.001), sleep disorders (43.2% vs 34.1%, p<0.001) and depression (24.4% vs 19.0%, p<0.001), and were more obese (35.1% of individuals with BMI ≥40 vs 15.1%, p<0.001). After propensity score weighting, standardised mean differences between groups were <0.1 for all covariates, showing adequate balance between groups at baseline after adjustment. In the main per-protocol analyses we found no evidence that GLP-1RA increased the incidence of SIS (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.35, 3.14). Intention-to-treat analyses resulted in an HR of 1.36 (95% CI 0.51, 3.61). In analyses excluding individuals with no BMI information and using imputation for BMI missing values, respective HRs were 0.89 (95% CI 0.26, 3.14) and 1.29 (95% CI 0.42, 3.92). Stratified analyses showed no differences between subgroups. Conclusions/interpretation: Our findings do not support an increased risk of SIS when taking GLP-1RA in individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity; however, the rarity of SIS events and the wide uncertainty of effect size (although null, effect may be compatible with a risk as high as threefold) calls for a cautious interpretation of our results. Further studies, including final evaluations from regulatory bodies, are called for to discard a causal link between GLP-1RA and suicidality. Graphical

1 March 2017 in Heart
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BLBeatriz G López-Valcárcel
Beatriz G López-Valcárcel
JLJulián Librero López
Julián Librero López
AGANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
ANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
LPLuz María Peña
Luz María Peña
SBSofía Bauer
Sofía Bauer
GSGABRIEL SANFELIX
GABRIEL SANFELIX
Objectives Cost-sharing scheme for pharmaceuticals in Spain changed in July 2012. Our aim was to assess the impact of this change on adherence to essential medication in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the region of Valencia. Methods Population-based retrospective cohort of 10 563 patients discharged alive after an ACS in 2009–2011. We examined a control group (low-income working population) that did not change their coinsurance status, and two intervention groups: pensioners who moved from full coverage to 10% coinsurance and middle-income to high-income working population, for whom coinsurance rose from 40% to 50% or 60%. Weekly adherence rates measured from the date of the first prescription. Days with available medication were estimated by linking prescribed and filled medications during the follow-up period. Results Cost-sharing change made no significant differences in adherence between intervention and control groups for essential medications with low price and low patient maximum coinsurance, such as antiplatelet and beta-blockers. For costlier ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) and statins, it had an immediate effect in the proportion of adherence in the pensioner group as compared with the control group (6.8% and 8.3% decrease of adherence, respectively, p<0.01 for both). Adherence to statins decreased for the middle-income to high-income group as compared with the control group (7.8% increase of non-adherence, p<0.01). These effects seemed temporary. Conclusions Coinsurance changes may lead to decreased adherence to proven, effective therapies, especially for higher priced agents with higher patient cost share. Consideration should be given to fully exempt high-risk patients from drug cost sharing.

11 December 2020 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IHIsabel Hurtado
Isabel Hurtado
AGANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
ANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
SPSalvador Peiró
Salvador Peiró
GSGabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno
Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno
Background: The opioid epidemic has been extensively documented in the United States and Canada, but fewer data are available for Europe.Aim: To describe the trends in opioid use—volume of prescriptions, dosage and number of patients treated—in a Spanish population with more than 4.2 million inhabitants aged 18 years and older.Patients and Methods: Population-based cross-sectional analysis of opioid prescription in adults (≥18 years) from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018 in the region of Valencia, Spain. Outcomes were estimated on an annual basis: number of prescriptions, prescription rate per 100 inhabitants, dosage per capita (morphine mg equivalents, MME/c) and volume of patients treated (overall and by drug).Results: Over the study period, 2,107,756 unique patients were prescribed more than 35 million total treatments. The yearly number of treatments doubled, and total MME/c showed almost a threefold increase. Fentanyl MME/c more than tripled, accounting for 34.4% of the total MME/c in 2018. Oxycodone MME/c showed a 10-fold increase, while tapentadol, launched in 2011, showed the highest growth rates. The annual number of patients receiving at least one opioid prescription more than doubled, from 335,379 in 2010 to 722,838 in 2018.Conclusions: Even if proportions still seem far from epidemic, urgent research is warranted on the observed patterns of use, their appropriateness and their association with health and safety outcomes, especially for high-use and high-strength drugs.

12 February 2019 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
ANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
IHIsabel Hurtado
Isabel Hurtado
DBDaniel Bejarano-Quisoboni
Daniel Bejarano-Quisoboni
CRClara Rodríguez-Bernal
Clara Rodríguez-Bernal
YSYared Santa-Ana
Yared Santa-Ana
GSGABRIEL SANFELIX
GABRIEL SANFELIX
Worldwide, there is growing evidence that quality of international normalized ratio (INR) control in atrial fibrillation patients treated with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) is suboptimal. However, sex disparities in population-based real-world settings have been scarcely studied, as well as patterns of switching to second-line Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC). We aimed to assess the quality of INR control in atrial fibrillation patients treated with VKA in the region of Valencia, Spain, for the whole population and differencing by sex, and to identify factors associated with poor control. We also quantified switching to Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOAC) and we identified factors associated to switching. This is a cross-sectional, population-based study. Information was obtained through linking different regional electronic databases. Outcome measures were Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) and percentage of INR determinations in range (PINRR) in 2015, and percentage of switching to NOAC in 2016, for the whole population and stratified by sex. We included 22,629 patients, 50.4% were women. Mean TTR was 62.3% for women and 63.7% for men, and PINNR was 58.3% for women and 60.1% for men (p<0.001). Considering the TTR<65% threshold, 53% of women and 49.3% of men had poor anticoagulation control (p<0.001). Women, long-term users antiplatelet users, and patients with comorbidities, visits to Emergency Department and use of alcohol were more likely to present poor INR control. 5.4% of poorly controlled patients during 2015 switched to a NOAC throughout 2016, with no sex differences. The quality of INR control of all AF patients treated with VKA in 2015 in our Southern European region was suboptimal, and women were at a higher risk of poor INR control. This reflects sex disparities in care, and programs for improving the quality of oral anticoagulation should incorporate the gender perspective. Clinical inertia may be lying behind the observed low rates of switching in patient with poor INR control.

1 October 2018 in Medicina Clinica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BVBernardo Valdivieso
Bernardo Valdivieso
AGANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
ANIBAL GARCIA-SEMPERE
GSGABRIEL SANFELIX
GABRIEL SANFELIX
RFRaquel Faubel
Raquel Faubel
JLJulián Librero López
Julián Librero López
SPSalvador Peiró
Salvador Peiró