Objective. Date fruit has been reported to have benefits in type 2 diabetes (T2D), though there is a concern, given the high sugar content, about its effects on glycemic control. Design and Setting. Prospective, interventional, randomized, parallel study. Participants. In total, 79 patients with T2D (39 male and 40 female). Intervention. Participants were randomly allocated to either 60 g date fruit or 60 g raisins daily of the equivalent glycemic index (amount split, given as midmorning and midafternoon snack) for 12 weeks. Main Outcome Measures. The primary outcome was to investigate the effect of date fruit on HbA1c and fasting blood glucose, and their variability, in patients with T2D in comparison to the same glycemic load of raisins. The secondary outcomes were to determine whether date fruit affected cardiovascular risk by measuring fasting lipids, C-reactive protein (CRP), blood pressure, and insulin resistance (IR) as measured by Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA-IR). Results. In total, 61 (27 female and 34 male) of 79 patients completed the study. There was no difference between or within groups for HbA1c or HbA1c variability, fasting glucose or glucose variability, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S), beta cell function (HOMA-B), the disposition index, lipids, systolic (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP), or C-reactive protein (CRP) (p > 0.05). Conclusion. No improvement in glycemic indices was seen following supplementation of 60 g daily date fruit or raisins, though neither had a deleterious effect on glycemic control over a 12-week period, indicating their safety when consumed in T2D. Additionally, no beneficial therapeutic effects of date fruit on other cardiovascular indices in T2D were seen.

Introduction: Intermittent fasting (IF) is becoming increasingly popular as a method of weight management, but it is unknown whether it affects plasticiser intake with resultant changes in glycaemic control in diabetes and vitamin D (VitD) levels; therefore, this study was undertaken in a cohort of control and type-2 diabetic (T2D) subjects during Ramadan time-restricted feeding (TRF). Methods: In T2D subjects (n = 19) and controls (n = 31) undertaking TRF, 24 h urinary levels of phthalate metabolites, bisphenols and serum VitD were determined pre- and post-TRF by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Anthropometric data and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured. Results: T2D subjects were older (52 versus 36.73 years, p < 0.001), and had higher BMI (36.54 versus 27.67 kg/m², p < 0.001), body weight (101.77 versus 80.36 kg, p < 0.001), and HbA1c (8.38 versus 5.46%, p < 0.001) compared to controls, while VitD levels did not differ (60.43 versus 63.95 nmol/L, p > 0.05). Post-TRF, HbA1c was unchanged in T2D subjects and there was no difference in weight, BMI or VitD. Increased mono-iso-butyl phthalate (MiBP) in T2D subjects (10 versus 6.1 ng/mL, p = 0.001) and mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP) in T2D subjects (37 versus 13 ng/mL, p = 0.018) and controls (8.3 versus 5.4 ng/mL, p = 0.007) were observed post-TRF; however, significance was lost after adjusting for baseline differences in age, BMI, and HbA1c using a general linear model (GLM) repeated-measures ANOVA. Despite having no median differences in DEHP (di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate) metabolites pre- and post-TRF, analyses revealed a significant time × HbA1c interaction for [mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate, MECPP: F(1,42) = 4.79, p = 0.03, mono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate, MEHHP: F(1,42) = 8.56, p = 0.006, mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, MEHP: F(1,42) = 4.64, p = 0.03 and mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate, MEOHP: F(1,42) = 8.19, p = 0.007] and time × group interactions [MEHHP: F(1,42) = 14.27, p < 0.001, MEHP: F(1,42) = 6.35, p = 0.01 and MEOHP: F(1,42) = 10.30, p = 0.003]. Estimated marginal means (adjusted for age, BMI, HbA1c, and VitD) further confirmed higher concentrations of DEHP metabolites [MECPP, MEHHP, MEHP, and MEOHP] in T2D participants over time compared with controls. Additionally, monomethyl phthalate (MMP) trajectories were significantly influenced by the time × group interaction (F(1,42) = 4.28, p = 0.04), with post-TRF elevations observed in T2D subjects. Vitamin D status was observed to modify mono(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP) and MEP trajectories over time. Conclusion: Ramadan TRF is associated with changes in plasticiser metabolite levels, with estimated increased levels in T2D subjects versus healthy controls. Metabolite levels were influenced by HbA1c and vitamin D, though BMI was not observed to be a contributing factor.

Background: Plasticisers with endocrine-disrupting potential are ubiquitous and associate with obesity and type-2 diabetes (T2D), with higher levels reported in the Middle East. However, no data exist on plasticiser exposure in Bahrain where T2D affects 15% of the national population. Methods: An observational exploratory study in T2D (n = 60) and controls (n = 96), analysed for 24 h urinary plasticiser levels (liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)). Correlation and generalised linear model (GLM) analyses were employed to examine associations. Results: T2D were older (p < 0.001), had higher body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), body weight (p < 0.001) and glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (p < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed differences in inter-plasticiser, and plasticiser and biomarker relationships, with loss or reversal in T2D compared to controls. Mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP) levels were higher in T2D (p = 0.04); however, regression analysis revealed significant association with age. The GLM analyses demonstrated marked differences in the levels of mono(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (MCPP), mono(2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate (MECPP), monoethyl phthalate (MEP) and bisphenol S (BPS), with lower levels in T2D versus controls (B = −3.41, p = 0.01; B = −5.28, p < 0.001; B = −8.94, p < 0.001; B = −6.09, p = 0.006, respectively); however, these contrasts appeared to be substantially confounded by BMI and/or age. Positive influence of age and negative influence of BMI when observed across the full dataset were generally reversed in T2D. Levels were complementary to those previously reported for the Middle East. Conclusions: The study indicates the phthalate levels in Bahrain are elevated though complementary to studies of phthalates in the Middle East; within those levels, the study indicates differential exposure–response relationships with plasticisers, influenced by age and BMI, in those with T2D compared to healthy controls.