Yaoyao Dong

Yaoyao Dong


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2026 in Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QZQi Zhang
Qi Zhang
ZLZhifei Li
Zhifei Li
YDYaoyao Dong
Yaoyao Dong
HWHongyan Wang
Hongyan Wang
YWYu Wang
Yu Wang
HHHuang Hefei
Huang Hefei
The Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) in China is one of the world’s largest hydropower projects. Interval inflow, originating from ungauged areas between the upstream gauging control stations (Zhutuo, Beibei, Wulong) and the TGR dam site, is a critical component of total reservoir inflow, but its hydrological characteristics have not been fully clarified. The accurate estimation and prediction of interval inflow are essential for reservoir safety and flood control operations. Using daily hydrological data from 2009 to 2017, we propose an integrated analytical framework combining (i) flow travel time estimation using cross-correlation analysis, (ii) multi-scale statistical characterization, and (iii) K-means clustering with bootstrap validation and algorithm comparison. This framework systematically identified hydrological regimes of interval inflow and their associated flood control risks. The key findings are as follows. (1) The optimal flow travel time from the upstream gauging stations to the dam site is 1 day (correlation coefficient ρ=0.9809,p<0.001), and it remains stable across different flow regimes. (2) The interval inflow exhibited a highly right-skewed distribution (mean 1279 m3/s, standard deviation 1651 m3/s) and contributed on average 10.1% to the total inflow. The contribution ratio exhibited an inverted U-shaped relationship with increasing total inflow, peaking at 11.4% when the total inflow (Q) was 13,014 m3/s. The quartile thresholds were 5788 m3/s, 9575 m3/s, and 16,869 m3/s (corresponding to Q1, Q2, and Q3, respectively), and the 10th and 90th percentiles (P10 and P90) were 4865 m3/s and 24,625 m3/s, respectively. (3) Five distinct hydrological patterns (C1–C5) were successfully identified, among which Cluster C4 (5.7% of days) was defined as the high-impact pattern based on reservoir operational criteria, with a mean I of 6425 m3/s, a mean R of 27.8% (up to 44% in extreme events), a mean flood duration of 5.8 days, a mean flood volume of 36.1 × 108 m3, and a flashiness index of 1.48. (4) C4 is predominantly triggered by localized heavy rainfall, and its flashy nature implies a substantially shorter forecast lead time compared with mainstream-dominated floods, posing major challenges to real-time reservoir operations. This study demonstrates that interval inflow risk is pattern-dependent and that the proposed framework provides a scientific basis for developing pattern-specific reservoir operation strategies. The proposed framework is transferable to other large river-type reservoirs facing similar ungauged interval inflow challenges.

31 January 2026 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QZQi Zhang
Qi Zhang
YDYaoyao Dong
Yaoyao Dong
CZChesheng Zhan
Chesheng Zhan
YWYueling Wang
Yueling Wang
HWHongyan Wang
Hongyan Wang
HZHongxia Zou
Hongxia Zou
To address the challenge of predicting runoff processes in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River under the influence of complex river–lake relationships and human disturbances, this paper proposes a coupled model based on the Sparrow Search Algorithm-optimized Long Short-Term Memory neural network (SSA-LSTM) for daily runoff forecasting at the Jiujiang Hydrological Station. The input data were preprocessed through feature selection and sequence decomposition. Subsequently, the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA) was utilized to perform automated of key hyperparameters of the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, thereby enhancing the model’s adaptability under complex hydrological conditions. Experimental results based on multi-station hydrological and meteorological data of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River from 2009 to 2016 show that the SSA-LSTM achieves a Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.98 during the testing period (2016). The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) are reduced by 49.3% and 51.3%, respectively, compared to the standard LSTM. A comprehensive evaluation across different flow levels, utilizing Taylor diagrams and error distribution analysis, further confirms the model’s robustness. The model demonstrates robust performance across different flow regimes: compared to the standard LSTM model, SSA-LSTM improves the NSE from 0.45 to 0.88 in high-flow scenarios, exhibiting excellent capabilities in peak flow prediction and flood process characterization. In low-flow scenarios, the NSE is improved from −0.77 to 0.72, indicating more reliable prediction of baseflow mechanisms. The study demonstrates that SSA-LSTM can effectively capture hydrological nonlinear characteristics under strong river–lake backwater and human disturbances, providing a high-precision and high-efficiency data-driven method for runoff prediction in complex basins.

19 July 2026 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QZQi Zhang
Qi Zhang
KQKechang Qian
Kechang Qian
HHHuang Hefei
Huang Hefei
ZLZhonghe Li
Zhonghe Li
HMHuimin Meng
Huimin Meng
YDYaoyao Dong
Yaoyao Dong
Quantifying the net hydrological impact of large dams amidst climatic and anthropogenic influences remains a major challenge. This study isolates the effect of Three Gorges Dam (TGD) regulation on discharge at Jiujiang Station in the middle Yangtze River (2009–2016) using a novel scenario-based framework. A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, optimized by the Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), simulated daily discharge with high accuracy (Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient > 0.97). By comparing a “with-TGD” simulation against a “without-TGD” scenario—generated by replacing the dam’s regulated outflow with its reconstructed natural inflow—we quantified the net impact (ΔQ). Results show that ΔQ is substantially modulated by river–lake interactions. For example, in December, the backwater effect from Poyang Lake amplified the direct flow reduction by an additional −82.5 m3/s. The “peak-shaving” effect was context dependent: TGD regulation increased high flows (>30,870 m3/s) by an average of +372 m3/s while slightly decreasing low flows (<12,711 m3/s) by −31 m3/s. The impact exhibits strong seasonality alongside considerable intra-seasonal variability, reflecting multi-objective operations (flood control, power generation, water supply). This framework provides a transferable approach for attributing hydrological change in large regulated rivers and supports integrated water resources management.