Vascular lesions of the spinal cord are rare but potentially devastating conditions whose accurate recognition critically determines the clinical outcome. Several conditions lead to myelopathy due to either arterial ischemia, venous congestion or bleeding within the cord. The clinical presentation varies, according with the different aetiology and mechanism of damage. The aim is to provide a comprehensive review on the radiological features of the most common vascular myelopathies, passing through the knowledge of the vascular spinal anatomy and the clinical aspects of the different aetiologies, which is crucial to promptly address the diagnosis and the radiological assessment.

Background The management of ruptured posterior circulation perforator aneurysms (rPCPAs) remains unclear. We present our experience in treating rPCPAs with flow diverter stents (FDs) and evaluate their safety and efficacy at mid- to long-term follow-up. A diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for rPCPAs is also proposed. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from all consecutive patients with rPCPAs treated with FDs at our institutions between January 2013 and July 2019. Clinical presentations, time of treatments, intra- and perioperative complications, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were recorded, with a mid- to long-term follow-up. A systematic review of the literature on rPCPAs treated with FDs was also performed. Results Seven patients with seven rPCPAs were treated with FDs. All patients presented with an atypical subarachnoid hemorrhage distribution and a low to medium Hunt–Hess grade. In 29% of cases rPCPAs were identified on the initial angiogram. In 57% of cases, FDs were inserted within 2 days of the diagnosis. Immediate aneurysm occlusion was observed in 14% of the cases and in 71% at the first follow-up (mean 2.4 months). At mean follow-up of 33 months (range 3–72 months) one case of delayed ischemic complication occurred. Six patients had a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 and one patient had an mRS score of 4 at the latest follow-up. Conclusions The best management for rPCPAs remains unclear, but FDs seem to have lower complication rates than other treatment options. Further studies with larger series are needed to confirm the role of FDs in rPCPA.

In 2014, Chapot et al. introduced the pressure cooker technique (PCT), conceived to control undesired reflux of the embolic agent during the treatment of brain arterio-venous malformations (bAVMs). Since then, this technique increased in popularity and it has been extensively used. We present five consecutive cases in which the original PCT was simplified using nylon coils instead of platinum coils and acrylic glue, hence the name of ‘Simplified Pressure Cooker Technique’ (sPCT). The aim was to obtain a safer, precise and faster creation of the plug to control cohesive embolic agent reflux during the treatment of brain and facial vascular malformations.

Background: Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (b-AVM) carries a risk of iatrogenic injury to eloquent brain regions. Intraoperative neuro-monitoring (IONM) has increasingly been used to monitor spontaneous or evoked neural activity during neurosurgery, but its use is not as well characterized in the endovascular treatment (EVT) of b-AVMs. We aimed to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting any neurological deficit after b-AVM embolization with IONM, with or without provocative test (PT), and no-IONM. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from conception until March 1, 2022 for studies evaluating EVT with IONM and PT. Primary outcome was the rate of postoperative neurological deficits in EVT with IONM versus no-IONM, while secondary outcome was the subanalysis of IONM with or without PT. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel–Haenszel method and random effects modeling. Results: Six studies reached synthesis. Out of a total of 192 EVT, 14 events occurred. Results demonstrated a nonsignificant trend favoring IONM compared to no-IONM to prevent neurological deficits (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0–4.68). Among the EVT with IONM, PT was done in 411 branches with 10 events (0.2%) despite a negative PT. There was a nonsignificant trend favoring IONM plus PT compared to IONM without PT (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.02–1.07). Conclusions: Our study suggests that b-AVM EVT with IONM plus PT might reduce rates of postprocedural neurological deficits compared with EVT without IONM. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Recurrent brain tumors—including high-grade gliomas, brain metastases, and aggressive meningiomas—continue to carry a poor prognosis, with high mortality despite therapeutic advances. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize and critically discuss the current evidence on the role of intra-arterial radioligand therapy (RLT) in the treatment of recurrent brain tumors. RLT, a targeted form of radionuclide therapy, has gained increasing attention for its potential theranostic applications in neuro-oncology. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, including clinical studies evaluating intra-arterial radioligand delivery in central nervous system tumors. Recent research has explored intra-arterial administration of radioligands targeting somatostatin receptors and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). Somatostatin receptors are overexpressed in meningiomas, while PSMA is highly expressed in the neovasculature of glioblastomas and brain metastases; both targets can be addressed using lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu)- or actinium-225 (²²⁵Ac)-labeled radiopharmaceuticals, traditionally delivered intravenously. Available evidence indicates that the intra-arterial route achieves markedly higher radionuclide uptake on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET, as well as increased absorbed doses in dosimetric models. Dosimetric analyses consistently show greater tracer accumulation compared with intravenous administration, without evidence of significant peri-procedural toxicity. Uptake in healthy brain tissue is minimal, and no relevant differences have been reported in liver or salivary gland accumulation between intra-arterial and intravenous RLT. Although based on heterogeneous and limited data, intra-arterial RLT appears to be a promising therapeutic strategy for recurrent brain tumors. Future research should focus on improving radioligand delivery beyond the blood–brain barrier and enhancing effective tumor targeting.