He Jin

Dr. He Jin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2024 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMengyu Huang
Mengyu Huang
SZShaobo Zhong
Shaobo Zhong
XMXin Mei
Xin Mei
HJHe Jin
He Jin
Various cities in China have been identified as “stove cities” either in contemporary or historical times, exposing residents to extremely high temperatures. Existing studies on the heat island effect in stove cities are not representative nationwide. The outdated nature of these studies also significantly diminishes the relevance of their findings. Thus, reassessing the urban heat island (UHI) effect of stove cities is necessary in the context of global climate change and urbanization. This study focuses on seven symbolic and geographically distributed stove cities in China, including Nanjing, Chongqing, Wuhan, Fuzhou, Beijing, Xi’an, and Turpan. Using land surface temperature (LST) data, this study investigates the summer heat island effect from 2013 to 2023 and analyzes changes in the spatial distribution of the heat island effect. This paper utilizes impervious surface data and urban clustering algorithms to define urban and suburban areas. It then examines the evolution and spatial distribution of surface urban heat island intensity (SUHII) over time. Incorporating urbanization variables like population density and urban area, the study analyzes the main factors affecting the heat island effect from 2013 to 2018. We find that all cities continuously expand, with the annual average heat island effect intensifying over the years. With the exception of Beijing, the summer heat island or cool island effects in the remaining six cities show an overall intensification trend. From 2013 to 2018, SUHII has been primarily related to urban expansion and planning layout, with minimal impact from factors such as population density.

16 December 2025 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CQChang Qin
Chang Qin
PZPeiqin Zhao
Peiqin Zhao
YQYing Qian
Ying Qian
GYGuijun Yang
Guijun Yang
XHXingyao Hao
Xingyao Hao
HJHe Jin
He Jin
Big data and artificial intelligence technologies are driving a paradigm shift in smart farming, yet intelligent decision-making faces critical bottlenecks. At the data level, challenges include fragmentation, high acquisition costs, and inadequate secure sharing; at the model level, issues involve regional heterogeneity, weak adaptability, and insufficient explainability. To address these, this paper systematically reviews global research to establish a theoretical framework spanning the entire production cycle. Regarding data governance, trends favor federated systems with unified metadata and layered storage, utilizing technologies like federated learning for secure lifecycle management. For decision-making, approaches are evolving from experience-based to data-driven intelligence. Pre-harvest planning now integrates mechanistic models and transfer learning for suitability and variety optimization. In-season management leverages deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and model predictive control (MPC) for precise regulation of seedlings, water, fertilizer, and pests. Post-harvest evaluation strategies utilize spatio-temporal deep learning architectures (e.g., Transformers or LSTMs) and intelligent optimization algorithms for yield prediction and machinery scheduling. Finally, a staged development pathway is proposed: prioritizing standardized data governance and foundation models in the short term; advancing federated learning and human–machine collaboration in the mid-term; and achieving real-time, ethical edge AI in the long term. This framework supports the transition toward precise, transparent, and sustainable smart agriculture.