Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS), the official journal of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation, is an international, peer-reviewed, immediate open access journal. All published articles in JDRS has been free for everyone, without embargo, since 1990.

Whether the lateral ankle ligaments contribute to syndesmotic stability is still controversial and has been the subject of frequent research recently. In our study, we tried to elucidate this situation using the finite element analysis method. Intact model and thirteen different injury models were created to simulate injuries of the lateral ankle ligaments (ATFL, CFL, PTFL), injuries of the syndesmotic ligaments (AITFL, IOL, PITFL) and their combined injuries. The models were compared in terms of LFT, PFT and EFR. It was observed that 0.537 mm LFT, 0.626 mm PFT and 1.25° EFR occurred in the intact model (M#1), 0.539 mm LFT, 0.761 mm PFT and 2.31° EFR occurred in the isolated ATFL injury (M#2), 0.547 mm LFT, 0.791 mm PFT and 2.50° EFR occurred in the isolated AITFL injury (M#8). The LFT, PFT and EFR amounts were higher in the both M#2 and M#8 compared to the M#1. LFT, PFT and EFR amounts in M#2 and M#8 were found to be extremely close. In terms of LFT and PFT, when we compare models with (LFT: 0.650 mm, PFT: 1.104) and without (LFT: 0.457 mm, PFT: 1.150) IOL injury, it is seen that the amount of LFT increases and the amount of PFT decreases with IOL injury. We also observed that injuries to the CFL, PTFL and PITFL did not cause significant changes in fibular translations and PFT and EFR values show an almost linear correlation. Our results suggest that ATFL injury plays a crucial role in syndesmotic stability.

Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS), the official journal of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation, is an international, peer-reviewed, immediate open access journal. All published articles in JDRS has been free for everyone, without embargo, since 1990.

Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of patient positioning on intraoperative outcomes, specifically intraoperative time, fracture reduction, and implant location, in individuals with trochanteric femur fractures undergoing intramedullary nailing. The study compares two patient positions: the lateral decubitus position (LDP group) and the utilization of a traction table (TT group). Materials and Methods: A total of 82 patients with trochanteric femur fractures, who underwent surgery were included. The patients were divided into LDP and TT groups. Various parameters, including age, gender, fracture details, setup time, operation time, anesthesia time, fluoroscopy time, tip-apex distance (TAD), collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), reduction quality, and implant position, were analyzed. Result: Surgical time in the LD group was 33.90 ± 6.05 minutes, whereas in the TT group, it was 33.00 ± 6.64 minutes. Anesthesia time was 50.55 ± 7.46 minutes in the LD group and 55.26 ± 12.49 minutes in the TT group. Fluoroscopy time in the LD group was 45.20 ± 7.18 seconds, while in the TT group, it was 46.23 ± 4.50 seconds. Lateral decubitus position resulted in shorter setup and anesthesia times compared to the traction table. Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing in the lateral decubitus position is a viable and practical choice for fracture reduction, with the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality rates especially in elderly patients.

The treatments for hallux rigidus (HR) encompass a wide spectrum, including conservative methods and surgical approaches such as arthroplasty and arthrodesis. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of revision with arthrodesis following the failure of the first metatarsophalangeal joint total arthroplasty (MTPJ1TA). Patients who had surgery at two advanced orthopedic centers between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2024, were reviewed. Those with at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up were assessed for demographics (gender, age, side), reoperation rates, complications, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) scores, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal and Interphalangeal Scale (AOFAS-HMI) scores. Radiological evaluations included hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), dorsiflexion angle (DFA), and first ray length (FRL) in anteroposterior and lateral views. Of 27 patients, 4 were male (15%) and 23 female (85%), with an average age of 56.18 ± 7.49 years (range 41–72). Arthrodesis was performed in 26 patients, with one requiring reoperation due to implant failure. Average VAS scores were 7.14 preoperatively and 3.55 postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average FADI scores were 50.51 preoperatively and 71.51 postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average AOFAS-HMI scores were 51.22 preoperatively and 70.59 postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average HVA was 19.7° preoperatively and 6.29° postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average IMA was 10.66° preoperatively and 11.37° postoperatively (p = 0.406). Average DFA was 34.14° preoperatively and 22.33° postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average anteroposterior FRL was 10.17 cm preoperatively and 10.77 cm postoperatively (p < 0.05). Average lateral FRL was 10.12 cm preoperatively and 10.42 cm postoperatively (p < 0.05). None of the patients in the study exhibited postoperative donor site complications or transfer metatarsalgia, while a 100% rate of bone union was observed. We think that revision of MTPJ1TA with arthrodesis is a safe treatment option. Additionally, the use of an iliac crest autograft can be a viable option to restore bone stock and create a biological environment conducive to fusion. This study evaluates revision surgery with arthrodesis in the largest patient group with failed MTPJ1TA, highlighting its significance in the field. However, further studies are needed to determine the ideal surgical procedure.