Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR-mutant advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893 ) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Cancer immunotherapy has been extensively investigated in lymphoma over the last three decades. This new treatment modality is now established as a way to manage and maintain several stages and subtypes of lymphoma. The establishment of this novel therapy has necessitated the development of new imaging response criteria to evaluate and follow up with cancer patients. Several FDG PET/CT-based response criteria have emerged to address and encompass the various most commonly observed response patterns. Many of the proposed response criteria are currently being used to evaluate and predict responses. The purpose of this review is to address the efficacy and side effects of cancer immunotherapy and to correlate this with the proposed criteria and relevant patterns of FDG PET/CT in lymphoma immunotherapy as applicable. The latest updates and future prospects in lymphoma immunotherapy, as well as PET/CT potentials, will be discussed.

DTC accounts for the majority of endocrine tumors. While the incidence of thyroid cancer has been increasing globally over the past few decades, papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) generally shows an excellent prognosis, except in cases with aggressive clinicopathological features. This study aimed to assess the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 528 Arabic patients diagnosed with primary DTC from 1998 to 2021. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the impact of various factors on both OS and PFS. An univariable survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier curves. The 5- and 10-year OS for patients with DTC have exceeded 95%. Additionally, PFS showed very good rates (ranging between 96.5 and 85% at 5 and 10 years, respectively). Age, male gender, risk of recurrence, and distant metastasis were identified as the main negative prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, while RAI treatment was found to be a significant factor in improving OS. Moreover, adherence to the King Hussein Cancer Center’s (KHCC) CPG demonstrated significant improvement in PFS. These findings highlight common prognostic factors and favorable outcomes in Arabic patients with DTC treated at a tertiary cancer center using standard of care approaches.

Jordan, a lower- to middle-income country, is relatively small, but with rapidly growing population and a challenged economy. Cancer is a growing health care problem and currently ranked second, after cardiovascular diseases, as a cause of death. Jordan's national cancer registry continues to suffer from problems mostly related to long lag time in reporting, absence of outcome data, and accurate staging. The number of new patients with cancer diagnosed in Jordan is increasing at an expected, none disturbing rate, fueled by population growth, improving life expectancy, changing population structure that hosts more older population, high rate of obesity, smoking, and lack of adequate exercise. However, age-standardized rate for cancer incidence is significantly lower than Western societies, yet, mortality rate is higher. Despite efforts, cancer is still diagnosed at more advanced stages and at younger age. The Jordan breast cancer program represents a great example of opportunistic screening that led to significant downstaging of breast cancer. Efforts to evaluate the feasibility of screening programs for colorectal and lung cancers are underway. Tremendous efforts resulted in the execution of the largest clinical cancer genetics program in the region that helps identify patients and at-risk relatives for hereditary cancers. Low-resourced countries, including Jordan, will not be able to keep up with the rapidly increasing cost of cancer care. A better access to clinical trials and moving cancer care to ambulatory settings should offset some of this cost. A cancer control program that addresses all issues of cancer care from screening and early detection, through active cost-effective treatment that assures wider access to palliative care, hospice, and survivorship programs under an expanded universal health coverage, is an urgent national health priority.

The utilization of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy to target cluster of differentiation (CD)19 in cancer immunotherapy has been a recent and significant advancement. Although this approach is highly specific and selective, it is not without complications. Therefore, a systematic review was conducted to assess the current state of positron emission tomography (PET) in evaluating the adverse effects induced by CAR T-cell therapy. A thorough search of relevant articles was performed in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up until March 2024. Two reviewers independently selected articles and extracted data, which was then organized and categorized using Microsoft Excel. The risk of bias and methodological quality was assessed. In total, 18 articles were examined, involving a total of 753 patients, in this study. A wide range of utilities were analyzed, including predictive, correlative, and diagnostic utilities. While positive outcomes were observed in all the mentioned areas, quantitative analysis of the included studies was hindered by their heterogeneity and use of varying PET-derived parameters. This study offers a pioneering exploration of this promising field, with the goal of encouraging further and more focused research in upcoming clinical trials.

Background/Objectives: This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) using bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and clinical follow-up as reference standards. It further identifies predictive factors for bone marrow involvement (BMI) in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. Methods: NHL patients who underwent [¹⁸F]FDG PET and BMB at diagnosis in a tertiary cancer center were included in this study. Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed, and logistic regression was performed to identify BMI predictors using Stata software version 17. A retrospective analysis of 262 NHL patients was conducted. Results: Concordance rates between [¹⁸F]FDG PET and BMB and between [¹⁸F]FDG PET and clinical follow-up were 75.6% and 88.1%, respectively. The primary cause of discordance between [¹⁸F]FDG PET and BMB was the detection of extra-iliac focal hypermetabolic bone marrow lesions by [¹⁸F]FDG PET, which were negative on BMB. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [¹⁸F]FDG PET were 62.9%, 80%, and 75.6%, respectively, with BMB as a reference, and 74.1%, 97.5%, and 88.2%, respectively, with clinical follow-up as a reference. The focal bone marrow [¹⁸F]FDG pattern was the most reliable indicator of BMI. Univariate logistic regression showed that advanced NHL stage, elevated alkaline phosphatase, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase were significant predictors of BMI. Multivariate analysis revealed advanced NHL stage and thrombocytopenia as clinical predictors. Conclusions: [¹⁸F]FDG PET is a reliable tool for assessing BMI, providing comprehensive total-body evaluation and identifying extra-iliac involvement beyond the scope of BMB. The collective interpretation of molecular imaging, clinical, and biochemical factors is crucial for predicting BMI.